Back to Federal guidance

Unemployment benefits require a loss of work

Summary ETA told state unemployment agencies that a person must actually lose work for a period before receiving unemployment compensation for it. A drop in earnings alone is insufficient if the person's hours or days of work have not fallen; state law must test for actual unemployment before paying partial benefits. The letter does not address other eligibility conditions, such as availability for work.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
UIPL No. 08-98
Date issued
January 12, 1998
Status
Active
ETA's advisory listing labels this letter Active, and the signed letter prints Expiration Date: Continuing and Rescissions: None.
Status last verified October 25, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

Official letter (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/UIPL/1998/UIPL%2008-98/UC%20-%20Payment%20Only%20for%20Periods%20of%20Unemployment%20%28Accessible%20PDF%29%209.29.23.pdf):

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Washington, D.C. 20210
CLASSIFICATION: UI
CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL: TEUL
ISSUE DATE: 1/12/98
RESCISSIONS: None
EXPIRATION DATE: Continuing

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM LETTER NO. 08-98
TO: ALL STATE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY AGENCIES
FROM: GRACE A. KILBANE, Director, Unemployment Insurance Service SUBJECT: Unemployment Compensation (UC) - Payment Only for Periods of Unemployment

  1. Purpose. To remind States that Federal law limits the payment of UC to periods when an individual has
    experienced unemployment.

    1. References. Section 303(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (SSA) and Sections 3304(a)(4) and 3306(h) of
      the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA); Employment and Training Administration Glossary of
      Program Terms and Definitions, ET Handbook No. 373 (Glossary).

    2. Background. Since the inception of the UC program, Federal law has authorized withdrawals from a
      State's unemployment fund only with respect to an individual's unemployment. Put another way, Federal
      law limits the payment of UC to periods in which an individual has experienced unemployment, that is, an
      actual reduction in hours worked. As the result of questions arising from a review of a State's law, this
      UIPL is being issued to remind all States that their laws must contain this limitation.

    This UIPL addresses only whether an individual has experienced unemployment. It does not address
    other eligibility conditions related to the term "unemployment" such as able and available requirements.

    1. Discussion. Section 3304(a)(4), FUTA, requires, as a condition for employers in a State to receive credit
      against the Federal tax, that State law provide that:
       all money withdrawn from the unemployment fund of the State shall be used solely in the
       payment of unemployment compensation, exclusive of expenses of administration, and for
       refunds of sums erroneously paid into such fund. . .
      

    Section 303(a)(5), SSA, contains the same requirement as a condition for receiving administrative
    grants. Section 3306(h), FUTA, defines compensation as "cash benefits payable to individuals with
    respect to their unemployment." Thus, Federal law permits withdrawals from a State's unemployment
    fund only with respect to an individual's "unemployment."
    The 1935 Senate Report on the original Social Security Act also emphasized that UC may be paid only with respect to an individual's unemployment:

    Unemployment compensation differs from relief in that payments are made as a matter of
    right not on a needs basis, but only while the worker is involuntarily unemployed. . . .
    Payment of compensation is conditioned upon continued involuntary unemployment. [S. Rep.
    No. 628, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 11 (1935).]
    

On January 31, 1939, the Social Security Board, which at that time had Federal jurisdiction for the UC program, also concluded that unemployment must exist for UC to be payable:

    [S]ince . . . any benefits paid under a State law must be paid with respect to unemployment,
    a State's plan for the payment of partial benefits must safeguard against the payment for
    reduced earnings without accompanying unemployment.

Thus, whether an individual is unemployed within the meaning of Federal law depends on whether the individual has suffered a loss of work. It is not sufficient that the individual merely have reduced earnings.

The Department uses the phrase "partial benefits" to describe "UC of less than the full weekly benefit amount payable to a claimant." 1 Partial benefits may be paid for a period of "part-total unemployment" when an individual has odd jobs or subsidiary work with other than the individual's regular employer, or "partial unemployment" in which an individual works less than regular full-time hours for his/her regular employer. (Short-time compensation is a form of "partial unemployment.")

  1. Effect on State laws. State laws must be fashioned so as to prevent payment of UC to individuals who
    have experienced no unemployment for the period being compensated. Whether a payment of partial benefits may be made is determined by whether the individual has actually experienced unemployment. If wages are used as the only surrogate for unemployment, it may be possible that an individual, who moves from a high-paying job to a low-paying job, could experience no unemployment, or even see hours worked increased, and still be eligible for benefits. To avoid this, State law must contain a test which ensures that the individual has, in fact, experienced unemployment.

Generally, States provide for partial UC benefits through provisions of State law which specify the individual must be "unemployed." Usually States determine if the individual has worked less than a full- time week where "full-time week" means the number of hours or days per week currently established by schedule, custom, or otherwise, as constituting a week of full-time work for the kind of service an individual performs for an employing unit.

  1. Action Required. Each State should take appropriate action to ensure that its law is consistent with the
    above requirements.

  2. Inquiries. Inquiries should be directed to the appropriate Regional Office.

  3. This and the definitions of "partial" and "part-total" unemployment and "full-time week" are
    taken from the Glossary.

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace