Back to Federal guidance
Fiscal year 2008 state unemployment administration funding guidance
Summary ETA gave state unemployment agencies final fiscal year 2008 base funding allocations, explained reduced funding for workloads above base levels, and described supplemental budget request rules. ETA now lists this year-specific letter as Canceled.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
UIPL No. 7-08
Date issued
January 17, 2008
Status
Withdrawn
ETA lists this letter Canceled as of 2026-10-24; its PDF prints an expiration date of January 17, 2009.
Status last verified October 24, 2026
Is this still the rule?
This document has been withdrawn. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
UIPL7-08acc.pdf (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/UIPL/2008/UIPL7-08acc.pdf)
CLASSIFICATION
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION Unemployment Insurance
ADVISORY SYSTEM CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OWS/DFAS
Washington, D.C. 20210 DATE
January 17, 2008
ADVISORY: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM LETTER NO. 7-08
TO: STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES
FROM: DOUGLAS F. SMALL /s/
Deputy Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT: Guidelines for Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 State Agency Unemployment Insurance
(UI) Resource Allocations, Supplemental Budget Requests (SBRs), and
Above-Base Funding
1. Purpose. To provide the following information for FY 2008: UI State Administration base
resource allocations, general guidelines for resource planning, above-base funding, and
SBRs.
2. References. ET Handbook No. 336, 18th Edition, Unemployment Insurance State Quality
Service Plan (SQSP), Planning and Reporting Guidelines; Unemployment Insurance
Program Letter (UIPL) No. 24-07, Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 State Agency Unemployment
Insurance Resource Planning Targets and Guidelines; and UIPL No. 20-07, Call Memo for
the Fiscal Year 2008 Unemployment Insurance State Quality Service Plan.
3. Appropriation. The FY 2008 Omnibus spending bill that included the appropriation for State
UI operations (Public Law 110-161) was enacted on December 26, 2007. The table below
shows the amounts of the President’s Budget request, the appropriation, and the difference.
Budget Request Appropriation Difference
State Administration $2,550,723,000 $2,454,134,000 -$96,589,000
National Activities 10,500,000 9,727,000 -773,000
Total $2,561,223,000 $2,463,861,000 -$97,362,000
4. Final Base Allocations. The final FY 2008 base allocations are identical to the planning
targets. In order to provide as much stability as possible for state operations, the reductions
will be applied entirely to above-base funding.
RESCISSIONS EXPIRATION DATE
None January 17, 2009
5. Above-Base Workloads. The National Office currently projects a funding shortfall in above-
base funds in the amount of $79,727,000 due to the following:
a. Average Weekly Insured Unemployment (AWIU). As initially constructed, the
appropriation supported an AWIU of 2.525 million. With current economic assumptions
projecting an AWIU of 2.697 million, the resulting shortfall would have been
$49,334,000.
b. Across-the-Board Reduction. The enacted appropriation added an across-the-board cut
of 1.747 percent, resulting in a further reduction of $43,636,000.
c. Above-Base Reimbursement Rate. In order to mitigate the shortfall, $13,243,000 from
base reserves, which had been intended for targeted initiatives, will be diverted to above
base workload; however, available funding will necessitate reducing above-base
entitlements by 68 percent, reimbursing 32 cents on the dollar. Should actual workloads
change substantially from the current estimates, the above-base reimbursement rate will
be adjusted, up or down, to reflect more recent actual workloads experienced.
6. Other Above-Base Funding Information.
a. Contingency Reserve. The appropriation provides for an apportionment of contingency
reserve funds should the AWIU level exceed 2.786 million. A total of $28.6 million will
be made available for each increment of 100,000 (including a pro rata amount for any
increment less than 100,000) in the AWIU above the 2.786 million level. However, any
AWIU falling between the 2.697 million that is currently projected and the 2.786 million
AWIU contingency reserve trigger will require the Department to reduce the above-base
reimbursement rate even further.
b. Support. The above-base overhead percentage remains at 19 percent. Although Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) administration is not an above-base function, its overhead
percentage is also 19 percent.
c. Trade Redeterminations. Currently, there are no court decisions regarding the TAA
program that would require the states to make monetary redeterminations. If one occurs,
states should follow the UI-3 reporting instructions in ET Handbook No. 336, 18th
Edition.
d. Postage. Above-base funding for postage will be issued to states on a quarterly basis
using the above base weeks claimed reported on the UI-3 reports. For any quarter,
above-base weeks claimed will be those in excess of 25 percent of the FY 2008 base
weeks claimed issued in the planning targets. The payment rate will be 21.5 cents per
week claimed.
7. Supplemental Budget Requests (SBRs). The SQSP Handbook contains SBR instructions and
procedures that remain in place each year unless states are instructed otherwise. States may
submit a Standard Form (SF) 424 for additional funds for certain types of administrative
costs (listed below) that are not funded within the states' base and above-base grants.
a. Special Projects. States that received Reemployment and Eligibility Assessments (REA)
grants in FY 2007 may receive funds to continue those initiatives at the lesser of the
amount requested in their FY 2008 proposal or the funding level provided in FY 2007.
Proposals to expand REA initiatives to additional states were solicited; however, funding
for these initiatives was not included in the appropriation and, therefore, cannot be
awarded. In addition, no funds are available for information technology security
improvements this year.
b. UI Performs Travel. Travel dollars are available for Benefit Accuracy Measurement Peer
Reviews, Benefits Timeliness and Quality Nonmonetary Determinations Tripartite
Reviews, Appeals Reviews, and Tax Performance System Integrity Reviews. States
should provide travel estimates and reimbursement requests to the regional office rather
than submitting an SF 424 for these travel dollars.
8. State Flexibility. States have full authority to shift UI resources among program categories,
as deemed appropriate and necessary, to manage and operate their UI programs to meet
established goals and requirements. The only caveat is that states must use the annual
allocated staff year level for claims activities for above-base reporting purposes. This
ensures that states do not earn more above-base resources than they otherwise would have
been entitled to earn.
9. Action Required. State Administrators are requested to provide copies of this information to
the appropriate staff.
10. Inquiries. Questions should be addressed to the appropriate regional office.
What does federal law require today?
This guidance has been withdrawn. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace