Back to Federal guidance
Using state unemployment funds for costs of nonfederal benefit loans
Summary ETA clarified when states may use particular unemployment fund transfers to pay interest and administrative costs on nonfederal loans taken to pay benefits. It says Reed Act money and modernization incentive payments may be used under statutory conditions and state appropriation, while the 2009 special administrative transfer may not; interest on federal Title XII advances has a separate prohibition. ETA lists this change as Active.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
UIPL No. 7-04, Change 1
Date issued
May 11, 2010
Status
Active
ETA lists this change Active as of 2026-10-24, and its PDF prints “Continuing” with no rescissions.
Status last verified October 24, 2026
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
UIPL07-04c1acc.pdf (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/UIPL/2010/UIPL07-04c1acc.pdf)
CLASSIFICATION
Employment and Training Administration Withdrawal Standard
Advisory System CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
U.S. Department of Labor OUI/DL
Washington, D.C. 20210 DATE
May 11, 2010
ADVISORY: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM LETTER No. 7-04,
Change 1
TO: STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES
FROM: JANE OATES /s/
Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT: Payment of Interest and Other Administrative Costs on Loans Used to Pay
Unemployment Compensation
1. Purpose. To clarify the Department of Labor’s position about the use of unemployment fund
moneys to pay interest and other administrative costs on non-federal loans used to pay
unemployment compensation (UC) under state law.
2. References. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA); Titles III, IX and XII of the Social
Security Act (SSA); Unemployment Insurance Program Letter (UIPL) Nos. 39-97, 7-04, and
14-09; and Training and Employment Guidance Letters Nos. 18-01 and 18-01, Change 1.
3. Background. UIPL No. 7-04 addressed situations where, instead of obtaining advances from
the Federal Unemployment Account as provided under Title XII of the SSA, states obtained
loans from other, non-federal sources to pay UC. These non-federal loans may, for example,
come from state revenues or from selling bonds. UIPL No. 7-04 provided the Department’s
position on the use of unemployment fund moneys to repay these non-federal loans (including
bonds) or to pay associated costs such as interest, fees, or other administrative costs.
UIPL No. 7-04 stated that, with an exception, unemployment fund moneys may not be used to
pay interest, loan/bond fees, or other administrative costs on these non-federal loans. The
exception, the UIPL explained, was that a certain type of unemployment fund moneys,
commonly called Reed Act moneys, may be used for these purposes. In light of the
prohibition in Federal law on the use of unemployment fund moneys to pay interest on Title
XII loans, questions have arisen as to why the use of Reed Act moneys for this purpose is
permissible.
RESCISSIONS EXPIRATION DATE
None Continuing
This UIPL explains the Department’s position on this use of Reed Act moneys and other
unemployment fund moneys, such as the recent UC Modernization Incentive Payments, which
are available for administrative purposes.
4. Use of Reed Act and Other Unemployment Fund Moneys. The term “Reed Act” describes
moneys transferred to state accounts in the Unemployment Trust Fund (UTF) under Sections
903(a) and (d), SSA. These moneys may, under statutorily-prescribed conditions, be used for
certain administrative expenses, including the administration of the state’s UC law. Similarly,
UC Modernization Incentive Payments are transferred to state accounts under Section 903(f),
SSA, and are available, under statutorily-prescribed conditions, for the payment of costs of
administration of the state’s UC law. Finally, the $500 million Special Administrative
Transfers made to state accounts under Section 903(g), SSA, in 2009 is also available for the
payment of certain UC administrative costs. Since the funds described in Sections 903(a), (d),
(f), and (g) are transferred to the states’ accounts in the UTF from which UC is paid, these
funds are “unemployment funds” subject to Federal law restrictions.
Section 3304(a)(17), FUTA, requires, as a condition of employers in a state receiving credit
against the Federal unemployment tax, that—
any interest required to be paid on advances under title XII of the Social
Security Act . . . shall not be paid, directly or indirectly (by an equivalent
reduction in State unemployment taxes or otherwise) by such State from
amounts in such State’s unemployment fund; . . . . [Emphasis added.]
(Similar prohibitions are found at Sections 303(c)(3) and 1202(b)(5), SSA.)
As a result of this restriction, states may not use Reed Act moneys, UC Modernization
Incentive Payments, or the 2009 Special Administrative Transfer to pay interest on a state’s
Title XII loan.
This limitation is, however, expressly limited to interest due on Title XII advances. It does not
apply to non-federal loans. Also, although Federal law restricts the use of Reed Act and UC
Modernization Incentive Payments, it does not prohibit payment of interest, loan/bond fees, or
other administrative costs associated with non-federal loans. Thus, a state may, if the moneys
are appropriated by the state legislature consistent with Section 903, SSA, use Reed Act or UC
Modernization Incentive Payments to pay these costs.
The 2009 Special Administrative Transfer may not, however, be used for these costs. Unlike
the Reed Act and UC Modernization Incentive Fund provisions, which broadly allow use for
any purpose related to administration of a state’s UC law, the 2009 Special Administrative
Transfer is limited to specific administrative provisions related to UC Modernization,
improving state operations, and providing staff-assisted reemployment services. Since the
payment of costs associated with loans for the payment of UC is not one of these permissible
uses, the 2009 Transfer may not be used for the payment of these costs.
The following table summarizes the permissible uses of unemployment fund moneys as they
relate to interest and administration of Title XII advances and non-Title XII loans.
UC Advances and Loans
Permissible Uses
Funding Source Federal (Title XII) Non-federal Loans
Advances
Description SSA Reference Interest Administrative Interest Administrative
Costs Costs Costs Costs
1. UC Administrative Grant Section 302 No Yes No Yes
2. Reed Act Sections 903(a) and (d) No Yes Yes Yes
3. UC Modernization Incentive Section 903(f) No Yes Yes Yes
Payments
4. Special Administrative Transfers Section 903(g) No No No No
2009
5. All unemployment fund moneys not listed in lines 2-4 above No No No No
5. Action. State administrators should distribute this advisory to appropriate staff.
6. Inquiries. Questions should be addressed to your Regional Office.
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace