Back to Federal guidance
Fiscal 2022 sequestration for mandatory unemployment programs
Summary ETA instructed state unemployment agencies how to apply a 5.7 percent sequestration reduction in fiscal 2022. It explained which benefit programs were exempt, how the federal share of Extended Benefits was affected, and when state law could permit benefit reductions. The letter’s printed expiration date was September 30, 2022, and ETA now lists it as Canceled.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
UIPL No. 5-22
Date issued
December 20, 2021
Status
Unknown
ETA’s listing labels this letter Canceled, while its PDF prints “Rescissions: None” and an expiration date of September 30, 2022. The sources do not identify a cancellation instrument or explain whether the listed status reflects that expiration.
Status last verified October 24, 2026
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
CLASSIFICATION
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION Unemployment Insurance
ADVISORY SYSTEM CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OUI/DFAS
Washington, D.C. 20210 DATE
December 20, 2021
ADVISORY: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM LETTER NO. 5-22
TO: STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES
FROM: ANGELA HANKS
Acting Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT: Implementation of Sequestration under the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA)
for Mandatory Unemployment Insurance Programs for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022
1. Purpose. To ensure State Workforce Agencies (SWAs) apply the sequestration rules for
FY 2022 to mandatory Unemployment Insurance (UI) programs. These rules include the
application of sequestration on delayed benefit payments for prior FYs and the resulting
administrative costs.
2. Action Requested. The Employment and Training Administration (ETA) advises State
Administrators to provide this guidance to appropriate staff.
3. Summary and Background.
a. Summary – As required by the sequestration order and set out in the May 28, 2021, Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Report to the Congress on the Balanced Budget and
Emergency Deficit Control Act (BBEDCA) 251A Sequestration for FY 2022, a
5.7 percent reduction in non-exempt mandatory programs is effective as of
October 1, 2021, for FY 2022. Benefits attributable to Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security (CARES) programs remain exempted from sequestration; however,
the Department of Labor (Department) must apply sequestration to the administrative
costs associated with these programs.
b. Background – The BCA amended the BBEDCA of 1985 to require reductions in
budgetary authority, known as sequestration, beginning on January 2, 2013, unless
Congress passed, and the President signed, a bill that reduced the deficit by at least
$1.2 trillion over 10 years. Such action did not occur and sequestration rules have been in
effect since FY 2013.
4. Sequestration in FY 2022.
a. Impact on the Mandatory UI Programs. Below is a list of programs, projects, and
activities (PPAs) related to the mandatory UI programs and the applicability of
sequestration to each PPA.
RESCISSIONS EXPIRATION DATE
None September 30, 2022
The following PPAs are exempted from sequestration:
1) Unemployment compensation paid by a state from its account in the Unemployment
Trust Fund;
2) Title XII, Social Security Act (SSA), advances to states;
3) Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) and Unemployment
Compensation for Ex-Servicemembers (UCX);
4) Benefit expenses attributable to PPAs enacted through Pub. L. 116-136, the
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. (see explanation in
paragraph b. below)
Note: The Federal Emergency Management Agency advises that there is no impact
on Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA) administrative funding or benefits.
Sequestration applies to the following PPAs:
1) The permanent Federal share of Extended Benefits (EB);
2) Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) funds appropriated under the Federal
Unemployment Benefits and Allowances Account (FUBA);
3) Administrative expenses attributable to PPAs enacted through Pub. L. 116-136, the
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.
b. Impact of Sequestration on Benefit Costs for CARES Act PPAs. As stated above, the
sequestration order set out in OMB’s Report to Congress requires a 5.7 percent reduction
to budget authority approved for FY 2022. The PPAs established through enactment of
the CARES Act, as amended, expired September 6, 2021. Although residual benefit
payments will continue to be issued to claimants beyond the expiration of these programs,
the Department, in consultation with OMB, has determined these residual benefit
payments to be obligations incurred when the week of unemployment was experienced.
Therefore, residual benefit payments will continue to be charged to the FY 2021 budget
authority and will not be subject to the 5.7 percent sequestration reduction.
c. Impact of Sequestration on Administrative Costs for CARES Act PPAs. The
administrative expenses to be paid in FY 2022 for CARES Act programs are treated
differently than CARES Act benefit costs paid in FY 2022. Administrative costs for
CARES Act programs will require new budget authority for FY 2022 and will be subject
to a 5.7 percent reduction. The National Office will apply the sequestration reduction to
amounts prior to issuing the administrative funding to state grants.
d. Impact of Sequestration on EB. The permanent 50 percent Federal share of EB benefits
authorized in the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act (EUCA) of
1970 remains subject to sequestration. The applicable percentage of sequestration
reduction to the permanent 50 percent Federal share of EB costs for FY 2022 is
5.7 percent starting with weeks of unemployment ending on October 2, 2021, and
concluding with weeks of unemployment ending on September 24, 2022. Unless a state
amends its law to reduce EB, as explained below, a reduction in the Federal share of EB
due to sequestration means the state becomes responsible for paying the remaining EB
share from its own funds, i.e., the amount represented by the 5.7 percent reduction to the
50 percent Federal share provided under EUCA. For any EB payments related to the
permanent EB program as authorized by EUCA made in FY 2022, the FY 2022
sequestration reduction of 5.7 percent must be applied.
Authority for States to Reduce EB Weekly Benefit Amounts due to Sequestration
Under EUCA, the EB weekly benefit amount (WBA) is “the amount of regular
compensation (including dependents’ allowances) under the State law payable to such
individual for such week for total unemployment.” (Section 202(b)(2), EUCA.) However,
section 256(h)(2) of BBEDCA (2 U.S.C. 906(i)(2)) permits states to reduce EB WBAs if
the Federal share of EB costs is reduced under a sequestration order. That section
provides:
(A) A State may reduce each weekly benefit payment made under the Federal-
State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970 for any week of
unemployment occurring during any period with respect to which payments are
reduced under an order issued under section 904 of this title by a percentage not
to exceed the percentage by which the Federal payment to the State under section
204 of such Act is to be reduced for such week as a result of such order.
(B) A reduction by a State in accordance with subparagraph (A) shall not be
considered as a failure to fulfill the requirements of section 3304(a)(11) of
Title 26.
As a condition of reducing EB WBAs, state law must authorize the reduction in EB
WBAs as specified in the BBEDCA. Note that actual reductions in Federal spending
could not be achieved if WBAs are reduced without also reducing individuals’ remaining
entitlement or maximum benefit amount (MBA) for EB. For this reason, state law must
also provide for reductions in EB remaining entitlement and MBA if it provides for
reducing EB WBAs.
Any state amending its law to provide for EB reductions due to sequestration must provide
notice to claimants and an opportunity to appeal the calculation of the amounts. The
notice should also inform claimants that appeal of the sequestration reduction itself will
not succeed as sequestration is mandated by Federal law.
Any state considering a change in state law to reduce the WBA is encouraged to work
closely with ETA to ensure conformity with Federal UC law.
e. Impact of Sequestration on TAA. The applicable percentage of reduction to TAA is
5.7 percent in FY 2022. As in previous fiscal years, using the flexibility under BBEDCA,
the Department will apply the full TAA Program sequestration to the funding for Training
and Other Activities, which are the funds available for training, employment and case
management services, out-of-area job search, relocation allowances, and related
administrative expenses. The reductions will not be applied to Trade Readjustment
Allowances (TRA), Reemployment Trade Adjustment Assistance (RTAA) benefits, or
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) available under the TAA Program.
5. Inquiries. Please direct inquiries to the appropriate ETA Regional Office.
6. References.
Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970 (Federal-State
EUCA) (Pub. L. 91-373);
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (BBEDCA)
(Pub. L. 99-177), as amended by the Budget Control Act of 2011;
Budget Control Act of 2011(BCA) (Pub. L. 112-25);
Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-96);
American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA) (Pub. L. 112-240);
Families First Coronavirus Response Act of 2020 (Pub. L. 116-127);
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act of 2020
(Pub. L. 116-136);
Unemployment Insurance Program Letter (UIPL) No. 23-08, issued July 7, 2008,
Supplemental Appropriation Act, 2008, Title IV – Emergency Unemployment
Compensation, and its changes 1 through 6;
UIPL No. 04-10, Change 3, Emergency Unemployment Compensation Program
Extension and Modification, Extended Benefits Temporary Provisions Extension, and
Expiration of Federal Additional Compensation, issued July 23, 2010;
UIPL No. 04-10, Change 9, Extension and Modification of Emergency Unemployment
Compensation, 2008 (EUC08) and Extension of Temporary Extended Benefits (EB)
Provisions, issued March 5, 2012;
UIPL No. 22-12, Short-Time Compensation Provisions in the Middle Class Tax Relief
and Job Creation Act of 2012, issued June 18, 2012;
UIPL 18-19, Implementation of Sequestration under the Budget Control Act of 2011
(BCA) for Mandatory Unemployment Insurance Programs for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020,
issued September 16, 2019;
UIPL 12-21, Implementation of Sequestration under the Budget Control Act of 2011
(BCA) for Mandatory Unemployment Insurance Programs for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021,
issued January 19, 2021;
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Report to the Congress on the Joint
Committee Reductions for Fiscal Year 2020, dated March 18, 2019;
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Report to the Congress on the Joint
Committee Reductions for Fiscal Year 2021, dated February 10, 2020; and
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Report to the Congress on the BBEDCA
251A Sequestration for Fiscal Year 2022, dated May 28, 2021.
7. Attachments. Not applicable.
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace