Program year 2005 Indian and Native American program allotments and performance levels
Is this still the rule?
This document has been withdrawn. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.
Signed letter (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2005/TEGL35-04.pdf):
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ADVISORY SYSTEM
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Washington, D.C. 20210
CLASSIFICATION: WIA Section 166 Indian and Native American Program
CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL: ONP/DINAP
DATE: June 2, 2005
TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO. 35-04
TO: ALL INDIAN AND NATIVE AMERICAN GRANTEES
FROM: EMILY STOVER DeROCCO
Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT: Program Year (PY) 2005 Comprehensive Services Program and Supplemental Youth Services Program Funding Allotment and Recommended Performance Levels
1. Purpose. To transmit planning guidance on the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Section
166 two-year plan for the PY 2004-2005 Comprehensive Services Program (CSP) and the
Supplemental Youth Services Program (SYSP) funding allotments and recommended
performance levels for PY 2005.
2. References.
a. WIA, Public Law 105-220;
b. Division of Indian and Native American Program (DINAP) Bulletin No. 00-04 - Final
WIA Regulations - 20 CFR Parts 652 et al. and 668;
c. DINAP Bulletin No. 03-03 - WIA Section 166 Designation Procedures for PY 2004 and
2005; and
d. DINAP Bulletin No. 03-06 - Planning Instructions for PY 2004-2005 WIA CSP.
3. Background. WIA Section 166(e) requires Indian and Native American (INA) grantees to
submit a two-year program plan that describes the grantee’s strategy for meeting the
employment and training needs of American Indians, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians.
Accordingly, INA grantees submitted a two-year plan at the beginning of PY 2004 that
covers both PY 2004 and 2005. This Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL)
provides guidance on submitting modifications (if needed) to the two-year program plan and
establishes recommended performance levels for PY 2005. This TEGL also provides
information on PY 2005 allotments for the CSP and SYSP.
4. Information. A unilateral modification from the Grant Office which automatically adds PY
2005 funds in the SYSP and CSP grant will be processed for those plans that do not have
any major changes to service strategy (see items (b) and (c)). Two-year plans that require a
modification must be reviewed by the DINAP office and approved by the Grant Officer.
RESCISSIONS: EXPIRATION DATE: Continuing
None
a. Allotments: The PY 2005 CSP appropriation is $54,237,600. The appropriation for the
SYSP is $14,794,321. A 0.8 percent reduction, applied to all domestic programs
government-wide, is incorporated in the amounts appropriated.
PY 2005 will be the first year that 2000 Census data will be used in the allotment
formula. The 2000 Census gave respondents the choice of recording their race based on
a single racial identity, or alternatively, on a multi-racial identity. This option made
available two data sets from which to derive PY 2005 allotments. The allotments
indicated in Attachments 1 and 2 are derived from 2000 Census single racial identity
data for American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian adults and youth.
Additionally, 2000 Census data for youth in poverty are used to derive allotments for the
SYSP.
To prevent allotments based on the 2000 Census data from causing program disruptions,
a 90 percent hold-harmless concept is used in determining the PY 2005 allotments. The
hold-harmless concept compares each grantee’s relative share (or percentage) of the
2000 Census data’s total relevant population to the grantee’s relative share (percentage,
not dollars) of the prior year’s (PY 2004) funding. Therefore, when the hold-harmless is
applied, a grantee will receive funding for PY 2005 based on no less than 90 percent of
their prior year relative share (percentage, not dollars).
Additionally, a hold-harmless concept will be in effect over a five year period, PY 2005
through PY 2009, applied against the prior year relative share (percentage, not dollars).
The hold-harmless levels for the Comprehensive Program will be 90 percent through PY
2008 and 85 percent for PY 2009, and, for the Youth Supplemental Services Program,
90, 80, 70, 60 and 50 percent, for PY 2005 through PY 2009, respectively. In PY 2010,
all grantees will receive funding that reflects their actual relative share based on the 2000
Census data for both programs.
Attachments 1 and 2 provide the PY 2005 allotments for grantees for the SYSP and
CSP, respectively, to be used for program planning purposes.
b. Modification(s) ARE NOT NEEDED if: Grantees can meet the projected service
levels and adult and youth performance measures as currently approved in the
Comprehensive Services Plan (based on the PY 2005 allotments). Contact your Federal
Project Officer (FPO) for assistance when analyzing PY 2005 service levels and
performance measures.
c. Modification(s) ARE NEEDED if: Grantees plan to make major changes in service
strategy for PY 2005 (i.e., adding, expanding, deleting, or diminishing any allowable
service specified in your current two-year plan); if there is a decrease in participants that
exceeds 25 percent of participants previously proposed to be served, or 25 participants,
whichever is larger, or performance measures are proposed to be changed to reflect a
change in service strategy. Grantees that are uncertain whether a change to their service
strategy will require a modification should contact their FPO.
d. Performance Measures:
Menu of Measures: Grantees will continue to use the current “menu of measures”
system for PY 2005.
Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA): While a grantee’s individual
performance is rated against the three “menu of measures” they select, the Section 166
program, as a whole, is rated against GPRA goals that have been established for the
program. DINAP has been successful in achieving the SYSP goals and the CSP’s PTR;
however, the 54 percent EER goal has not been achieved. The GPRA goals for the
INA program are:
Comprehensive Services Plan
- Entered Employment Rate (EER) 54 percent
- Positive Termination Rate (PTR) 84 percent
Supplemental Youth Services Plan
- Attainment of at least two goals under established program activities--61 percent
- Attainment of a high school diploma, GED, or improving basic skills--66 percent
A Performance Standard Worksheet is included in this TEGL which establishes a
“recommended” and “minimally acceptable” EER goal for each grantee.
DINAP’s GPRA service goal for PY 2005 is 20,000 participants. In PY 2004 the
Section 166 service level achieved was 18,278 participants. Grantees are encouraged to
increase the number of participants served for PY 2005 in order for DINAP to meet the
GPRA level of 20,000 participants.
Average Cost Per Participant: ETA has decided not to include an “efficiency
measure” as one of the Common Measures (see TEGL 28-04); however, the
recommended national average that DINAP seeks is $4,000 per participant. This
average is calculated by dividing the total amount of funding for the PY 2005 CSP
program by the total number of participants planned to be served. In preparing the PY
2005 CSP plan, we recommend that grantees use this average cost level.
Common Measures: ETA has developed a set of common measures to evaluate
program performance for all ETA employment and training programs. The common
measures will not be implemented by DINAP until PY 2006. In PY 2005, DINAP will
begin training grantees on the common measures and will seek volunteers to serve as
“pilot” grantees. A TEGL providing further guidance on the common measures will be
forthcoming.
e. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): The Workforce Investment Act (WIA) calls
for a seamless, integrated One-Stop Career Center delivery system. The goal of
integration is to ensure that the full spectrum of community assets is available through
the local service delivery system to support human capital solutions for businesses,
industry and individual customers. States are required to describe their systems and
processes for implementing the One-Stop System. Section 166 grantees, as stated in
Section 662.200 of the final WIA regulations, are to negotiate in “good-faith” an MOU
with their Local Workforce Investment Boards.
One of DINAP’s objectives is to identify grantees that have been unable to negotiate
MOUs and document the reasons for reaching an impasse. This will help the
Department of Labor to identify and remove barriers and to address challenges to
supporting a fully-integrated system. As a requirement for submission of the CSP plan
following grantee designation for PY 2006-07, grantees will be required to submit
documentation of their negotiated MOU(s). In preparation for complying with this
requirement, grantees are to review their current MOU to determine whether it will need
to be renegotiated for the next grant cycle. Grantees that are unable to enter into an
MOU after good-faith negotiations will be required to fully document negotiation efforts
that have taken place and reasons for their inability to successfully negotiate an MOU.
Grantees will be required to submit such documentation with their PY 2006-07 CSP.
f. Waivers: Grantees may submit a request for a waiver of any statutory or regulatory
requirement except for those cited in section 668.920. Waiver requests can be submitted
at any time.
g. Public Law (P.L.) 102-477 Grantees: PY 2005 funds will be transferred to the
Department of Interior’s Office of Self Governance for all P.L. 102-477 grantees with
currently approved plans.
5. Action. Grantees planning to make the following changes to their current two-year plan
must submit the following:
a. A major change in service strategy: Grantees requesting a major change in service
strategy must submit a narrative explaining the change along with a grant signature sheet
(Attachment 3). If the change in service strategy also increases or decreases the planned
number of participants served in any of the allowable planned activities by more than
25%, a Participant and Cost Projection Worksheet (Attachments 4 and 5) and the
performance calculation worksheets (attachments 6 & 7) must also be submitted.
b. An average cost per participant in excess of $4,000: Grantees that plan to have an
average “cost per participant” of more than $4,000 must submit a narrative explaining
the training services and estimated costs. A Participant and Cost projection worksheet
(Attachments 4 and 5) along with a grant signature sheet (Attachment 3) must also be
submitted. The average cost per participant is calculated by dividing the total amount of
funding for the PY 2005 CSP program divided by the total estimated number of
participants the grantee plans to serve.
c. A change in performance measures selected in the original plan: Grantees
requesting to change measures from the three measures selected in their original two-
year plan must submit a revised Performance Measures Calculation Worksheet
(attachments 6 & 7); a Participant and Cost projection worksheet (Attachments 4 and 5)
and a grant signature sheet.
d. An increase in the negotiated administrative cost limit: Grantees requesting to
increase their negotiated administrative cost limit must submit justification for such
increases. Administrative cost limits are only negotiable up to 20 percent.
No further action is required by grantees that are not requesting a modification.
Grantees may use the optional forms provided (CSP and SYSP Participant and Cost
Projections Worksheet and Performance Calculation Worksheets) to determine if
modifications are needed to their two-year plans. A signed/approved Grant Signature
Sheet must accompany any requests for modification.
Please send the appropriate documentation to the following address:
U.S. Department of Labor
ETA/Room C-4312
Division of Indian and Native
American Programs
200 Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210
ATTN: MIS-CSP DESK
6. Inquiries. If you have questions about the information in this TEGL, contact your DINAP
Federal Project Officer: East Team, Craig Lewis (202-693-3384) or Andrea Brown (202-
693-3736); Midwest Team, Duane Hall (214-767-2154) or Dawn Anderson (202-693-
3745); and West Team, Guy Suetopka (415-975-4383) or Sibert Seciwa (415-975-4621).
Attachments
1) PY 2005 Supplemental Youth Services Allotments
2) PY 2005 Comprehensive Services Allotments
3) Grant Signature Sheet
4) Participant and Cost Projections Worksheet-Adult
5) Participant and Cost Projections Worksheet- Youth
6) Comprehensive Services Performance Measures Calculation Worksheet
7) Supplemental Youth Services Calculation Worksheet
Attachment 1 (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2005/TEGL35-04_Attach1.pdf):
ATTACHMENT 1
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Supplemental Youth Services for Native Americans
PY 2005 Allotments
State Grantee Total
Total $14,794,321
1 1 AL Inter-Tribal Council of Alabama 1,315
2 1 AL Poarch Band of Creek Indians 4,295
3 2 AK Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Association 25,054
4 2 AK Association of Village Council Presidents 198,587
5 2 AK Bristol Bay Native Association 52,663
6 2 AK Central Council of Tlingit and Haida 152,981
7 2 AK Chugachmiut 16,668
8 2 AK Cook Inlet Tribal Council 258,307
9 2 AK Copper River Native Association 7,637
10 2 AK Ilisagvik College 48,062
11 2 AK Kawerak Incorporated 81,603
12 2 AK Kenaitze Indian Tribe 24,295
13 2 AK Kodiak Area Native Association 29,758
14 2 AK Maniilaq Association Inc. 69,638
15 2 AK Metlakatla Indian Community 14,316
16 2 AK Orutsararmuit Native Council 37,529
17 2 AK Tanana Chiefs Conference, Inc. 152,367
18 4 AZ Affiliation of Arizona Ind. Cntrs. Inc. 0
19 4 AZ American Indian Association of Tucson 0
20 4 AZ Colorado River Indian Tribes 34,299
21 4 AZ Gila River Indian Community 181,041
22 4 AZ Hopi Tribal Council 116,874
23 4 AZ Hualapai Tribe 13,587
24 4 AZ Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. 39,476
25 4 AZ Native Americans for Community Action 0
26 4 AZ Navajo Nation 2,706,072
27 4 AZ Pasqua Yaqui Tribe 46,567
28 4 AZ Phoenix Indian Center, Inc. 0
29 4 AZ Quechan Indian Tribe 18,578
30 4 AZ Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Council 55,735
31 4 AZ San Carlos Apache Tribe 149,343
32 4 AZ Tohono O'Odham Nation 175,457
33 4 AZ White Mountain Apache Tribe 189,646
34 5 AR American Indian Center of Arkansas, Inc. 0
35 6 CA California Indian Manpower Consortium, Inc. 160,767
36 6 CA Candelaria American Indian Council 0
37 6 CA Indian Human Resources Center, Inc. 0
38 6 CA Northern CA Indian Development Council, Inc. 12,942
39 6 CA Southern CA Indian Center, Inc. 0
40 6 CA Tule River Tribal Council 12,169
41 6 CA United Indian Nations, Inc. 0
42 6 CA Ya-Ka-Ama Indian Education & Development 0
43 8 CO Denver Indian Center 0
44 8 CO Southern Ute Indian Tribe 16,975
45 8 CO Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe 23,364
ATTACHMENT 1
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Supplemental Youth Services for Native Americans
PY 2005 Allotments
State Grantee Total
Total $14,794,321
46 10 DE Nanticoke Indian Association, Inc. 0
47 12 FL Florida Governor's Council on Indian Affairs 0
48 12 FL Miccosukee Corporation 5,150
49 12 FL Seminole Tribe of Florida 21,986
50 15 HI Alu Like, Inc. 1,997,900
51 16 ID Nez Perce Tribe 29,962
52 16 ID Shoshone-Bannock Tribes 49,335
53 18 IN American Indian Center of Indiana, Inc. 0
54 20 KS Mid American All Indian Center, Inc. 0
55 20 KS United Tribes of Kansas and S.E. Nebraska 12,987
56 22 LA Inter-Tribal Council of Louisiana, Inc. 3,678
57 23 ME Penobscot Nation 24,311
58 25 MA Mashpee-Wampahoag Indian Tribal Council, Inc. 0
59 25 MA North American Indian Center of Boston, Inc. 0
60 26 MI Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians 3,579
61 26 MI Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan, Inc. 40,700
62 26 MI MI Indian Employment and Training Services, I 0
63 26 MI North American Indian Association of Detroit 0
64 26 MI Potawatomi Indian Nation 0
65 26 MI Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians 54,504
66 26 MI Southeastern Michigan Indians. Inc. 0
67 27 MN American Indian OIC 0
68 27 MN Bois Forte R.B.C. 7,155
69 27 MN Fond Du Lac R.B.C. 21,372
70 27 MN Leech Lake R.B.C. 51,712
71 27 MN Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians 11,821
72 27 MN Minneapolis American Indian Center 0
73 27 MN Red Lake Tribal Council 69,052
74 27 MN White Earth R.B.C. 45,071
75 28 MS Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians 67,247
76 29 MO American Indian Council 9,842
77 30 MT Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes 104,470
78 30 MT B.C. of the Chippewa Cree Tribe 35,241
79 30 MT Blackfeet Tribal Business Council 109,074
80 30 MT Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes 109,005
81 30 MT Crow Indian Tribe 83,906
82 30 MT Fort Belknap Indian Community 40,133
83 30 MT Montana United Indian Association 0
84 30 MT Northern Cheyenne Tribe 78,916
85 31 NE Indian Center, Inc. 0
86 31 NE Omaha Tribe of Nebraska 34,643
87 31 NE Winnebago Tribe 18,830
ATTACHMENT 1
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Supplemental Youth Services for Native Americans
PY 2005 Allotments
State Grantee Total
Total $14,794,321
88 32 NV Inter-Tribal Council of Nevada 66,264
89 32 NV Las Vegas Indian Center, Inc. 0
90 32 NV Reno Sparks Indian Colony 9,134
91 32 NV Shoshone-Paiute Tribes 14,117
92 34 NJ Powhatan Renape Nation 0
93 35 NM Alamo Navajo School Board 34,654
94 35 NM Eight Northern Indian Pueblo Council 29,655
95 35 NM Five Sandoval Indian Pueblos, Inc. 98,261
96 35 NM Jicarilla Apache Tribe 38,347
97 35 NM Mescalero Apache Tribe 47,106
98 35 NM National Indian Youth Council 0
99 35 NM Pueblo of Acoma 37,632
100 35 NM Pueblo of Isleta 34,359
101 35 NM Pueblo of Laguna 45,097
102 35 NM Pueblo of Taos 17,480
103 35 NM Pueblo of Zuni 126,964
104 35 NM Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. 32,870
105 35 NM Santa Clara Indian Pueblo 16,975
106 35 NM Santo Domingo Tribe 48,590
107 36 NY American Indian Community House, Inc. 8,731
108 36 NY Native Am. Comm. Services of Erie & Niagara Co 0
109 36 NY Native American Cultural Center, Inc. 11,658
110 36 NY Seneca Nation of Indians 45,608
111 36 NY St. Regis Mohawk Tribe 25,155
112 37 NC Cumberland County Association for Indian People 0
113 37 NC Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians 84,262
114 37 NC Guilford Native American Association 0
115 37 NC Haliwa-Saponi Tribe, Inc. 0
116 37 NC Lumbee Regional Development Association 0
117 37 NC Metrolina Native American Association 0
118 37 NC North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs 0
119 38 ND Spirit Lake Sioux Tribe 56,532
120 38 ND Standing Rock Sioux Tribe 104,890
121 38 ND Three Affiliated Tribes - Ft. Berthold Reservation 52,913
122 38 ND Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians 119,515
123 38 ND United Tribes Technical College 0
124 39 OH North America Indian Cultural Centers 0
125 40 OK Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 17,179
126 40 OK Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma 971,363
127 40 OK Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes 111,150
128 40 OK Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma 335,820
129 40 OK Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma 446,669
130 40 OK Citizen Band Potawatomi Indians of Oklahoma 340,728
131 40 OK Comanche Tribe of Oklahoma 91,829
132 40 OK Creek Nation of Oklahoma 435,625
ATTACHMENT 1
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Supplemental Youth Services for Native Americans
PY 2005 Allotments
State Grantee Total
Total $14,794,321
133 40 OK Four Tribes Consortium of Oklahoma 55,985
134 40 OK Inter-Tribal Council of N.E. Oklahoma 52,561
135 40 OK Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma 95,983
136 40 OK Native American Resource Center 237,037
137 40 OK Osage Tribal Council 69,127
138 40 OK OTOE-Missouria Tribe of Oklahoma 21,270
139 40 OK Pawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 26,383
140 40 OK Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma 55,696
141 40 OK Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 73,060
142 40 OK Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma 37,529
143 40 OK United Urban Indian Council, Inc. 324,163
144 40 OK Wyandotte Tribe of Oklahoma 0
145 41 OR Confed. Tribes of Siletz Indians of Orego 19,532
146 41 OR Confed. Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Res 15,720
147 41 OR Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs 44,994
148 41 OR Organization of Forgotten Americans 3,829
149 42 PA Council of Three Rivers 0
150 44 RI Rhode Island Indian Council 0
151 45 SC South Carolina Indian Development Council, Inc. 2,058
152 46 SD Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe 105,706
153 46 SD Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 18,628
154 46 SD Oglala Sioux Tribe 265,299
155 46 SD Rosebud Sioux Tribe 208,148
156 46 SD Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe 51,979
157 46 SD United Sioux Tribe Development Corp. 13,364
158 46 SD Yankton Sioux Tribe 45,657
159 48 TX Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribal Council 8,487
160 48 TX Dallas Inter-Tribal Center 0
161 48 TX Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 9,166
162 49 UT Indian Training & Education Center 4,922
163 49 UT Ute Indian Tribe 47,455
164 50 VT Abenaki Self-Help Association/ NH Ind. Counc. 0
165 51 VA Mattaponi Pamunkey Monacan Consortium 0
166 53 WA American Indian Community Center 40,241
167 53 WA Colville Confederated Tribes 53,482
168 53 WA Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Nation 109,823
169 53 WA Lummi Indian Business Council 28,302
170 53 WA Makah Tribal Council 13,364
171 53 WA Puyallup Tribe of Indians 14,738
172 53 WA Seattle Indian Center 0
173 53 WA The Tulalip Tribes 17,018
174 53 WA Western WA Indian Empl. and Trng Pgm. 93,567
175 55 WI Ho-Chunk Nation 10,328
176 55 WI Lac Courte Oreilles Tribal Governing Board 35,728
ATTACHMENT 1
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Supplemental Youth Services for Native Americans
PY 2005 Allotments
State Grantee Total
Total $14,794,321
177 55 WI Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 20,964
178 55 WI Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin 49,934
179 55 WI Oneida Tribe of Indians of WI, Inc. 32,723
180 55 WI Spotted Eagle, Inc. 0
181 55 WI Stockbridge-Munsee Community 5,419
182 55 WI Wisconsin Indian Consortium 28,296
183 56 WY Eastern Shoshone Tribe 29,813
184 56 WY Northern Arapaho Business Council 70,162
Attachment 2 (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2005/TEGL35-04_Attach2.pdf):
ATTACHMENT 2
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Comprehensive Services for Native Americans
PY 2005 Allotments
State Grantee Total
Appropriation Total $54,237,600
TAT 540,000
Grantee Total 53,697,600
1 1 AL Inter-Tribal Council of Alabama 258,267
2 1 AL Poarch Band of Creek Indians 90,928
3 2 AK Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Association 26,435
4 2 AK Association of Village Council Presidents 395,964
5 2 AK Bristol Bay Native Association 109,391
6 2 AK Central Council of Tlingit and Haida 186,444
7 2 AK Chugachmiut 22,566
8 2 AK Cook Inlet Tribal Council 406,807
9 2 AK Copper River Native Association 18,711
10 2 AK Ilisagvik College 76,066
11 2 AK Kawerak Incorporated 148,513
12 2 AK Kenaitze Indian Tribe 31,402
13 2 AK Kodiak Area Native Association 27,685
14 2 AK Maniilaq Association Inc. 111,234
15 2 AK Metlakatla Indian Community 17,989
16 2 AK Orutsararmuit Native Council 48,280
17 2 AK Tanana Chiefs Conference, Inc. 279,586
18 4 AZ Affiliation of Arizona Ind. Cntrs. Inc. 275,410
19 4 AZ American Indian Association of Tucson 299,892
20 4 AZ Colorado River Indian Tribes 61,059
21 4 AZ Gila River Indian Community 529,583
22 4 AZ Hopi Tribal Council 251,376
23 4 AZ Hualapai Tribe 34,225
24 4 AZ Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. 87,392
25 4 AZ Native Americans for Community Action 186,570
26 4 AZ Navajo Nation 6,011,664
27 4 AZ Pasqua Yaqui Tribe 99,103
28 4 AZ Phoenix Indian Center, Inc. 861,161
29 4 AZ Quechan Indian Tribe 38,206
30 4 AZ Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Council 123,266
31 4 AZ San Carlos Apache Tribe 360,037
32 4 AZ Tohono O'Odham Nation 413,804
33 4 AZ White Mountain Apache Tribe 446,042
34 5 AR American Indian Center of Arkansas, Inc. 541,835
35 6 CA California Indian Manpower Consortium, Inc. 3,042,421
36 6 CA Candelaria American Indian Council 279,547
37 6 CA Indian Human Resources Center, Inc. 320,306
38 6 CA Northern CA Indian Development Council, Inc. 223,310
39 6 CA Southern CA Indian Center, Inc. 1,299,194
40 6 CA Tule River Tribal Council 107,575
41 6 CA United Indian Nations, Inc. 447,987
42 6 CA Ya-Ka-Ama Indian Education & Development 73,300
43 8 CO Denver Indian Center 594,404
44 8 CO Southern Ute Indian Tribe 41,215
45 8 CO Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe 85,115
ATTACHMENT 2
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Comprehensive Services for Native Americans
PY 2005 Allotments
State Grantee Total
Appropriation Total $54,237,600
TAT 540,000
Grantee Total 53,697,600
46 10 DE Nanticoke Indian Association, Inc. 34,747
47 12 FL Florida Governor's Council on Indian Affairs 1,000,841
48 12 FL Miccosukee Corporation 94,564
49 12 FL Seminole Tribe of Florida 85,053
50 15 HI Alu Like, Inc. 1,499,971
51 16 ID Nez Perce Tribe 67,630
52 16 ID Shoshone-Bannock Tribes 200,542
53 18 IN American Indian Center of Indiana, Inc. 231,906
54 20 KS Mid American All Indian Center, Inc. 135,211
55 20 KS United Tribes of Kansas and S.E. Nebraska 208,554
56 22 LA Inter-Tribal Council of Louisiana, Inc. 540,612
57 23 ME Penobscot Nation 160,612
58 25 MA Mashpee-Wampahoag Indian Tribal Council, Inc. 56,874
59 25 MA North American Indian Center of Boston, Inc. 205,903
60 26 MI Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians 42,799
61 26 MI Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan, Inc. 63,384
62 26 MI MI Indian Employment and Training Services, I 592,894
63 26 MI North American Indian Association of Detroit 220,943
64 26 MI Potawatomi Indian Nation 87,533
65 26 MI Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians 187,551
66 26 MI Southeastern Michigan Indians. Inc. 109,463
67 27 MN American Indian OIC 483,430
68 27 MN Bois Forte R.B.C. 21,450
69 27 MN Fond Du Lac R.B.C. 189,359
70 27 MN Leech Lake R.B.C. 172,488
71 27 MN Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians 47,815
72 27 MN Minneapolis American Indian Center 356,776
73 27 MN Red Lake Tribal Council 207,372
74 27 MN White Earth R.B.C. 128,908
75 28 MS Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians 271,671
76 29 MO American Indian Council 580,886
77 30 MT Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes 249,812
78 30 MT B.C. of the Chippewa Cree Tribe 129,689
79 30 MT Blackfeet Tribal Business Council 284,413
80 30 MT Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes 259,194
81 30 MT Crow Indian Tribe 198,508
82 30 MT Fort Belknap Indian Community 115,680
83 30 MT Montana United Indian Association 331,255
84 30 MT Northern Cheyenne Tribe 200,630
85 31 NE Indian Center, Inc. 270,388
86 31 NE Omaha Tribe of Nebraska 81,846
87 31 NE Winnebago Tribe 41,463
ATTACHMENT 2
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Comprehensive Services for Native Americans
PY 2005 Allotments
State Grantee Total
Appropriation Total $54,237,600
TAT 540,000
Grantee Total 53,697,600
88 32 NV Inter-Tribal Council of Nevada 278,061
89 32 NV Las Vegas Indian Center, Inc. 153,272
90 32 NV Reno Sparks Indian Colony 13,898
91 32 NV Shoshone-Paiute Tribes 113,558
92 34 NJ Powhatan Renape Nation 275,085
93 35 NM Alamo Navajo School Board 71,711
94 35 NM Eight Northern Indian Pueblo Council 61,675
95 35 NM Five Sandoval Indian Pueblos, Inc. 145,217
96 35 NM Jicarilla Apache Tribe 58,546
97 35 NM Mescalero Apache Tribe 100,367
98 35 NM National Indian Youth Council 1,350,940
99 35 NM Pueblo of Acoma 132,069
100 35 NM Pueblo of Isleta 55,613
101 35 NM Pueblo of Laguna 89,468
102 35 NM Pueblo of Taos 42,994
103 35 NM Pueblo of Zuni 270,241
104 35 NM Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. 101,067
105 35 NM Santa Clara Indian Pueblo 30,754
106 35 NM Santo Domingo Tribe 83,121
107 36 NY American Indian Community House, Inc. 842,810
108 36 NY Native Am. Comm. Services of Erie & Niagara Co 150,958
109 36 NY Native American Cultural Center, Inc. 192,402
110 36 NY Seneca Nation of Indians 213,043
111 36 NY St. Regis Mohawk Tribe 131,846
112 37 NC Cumberland County Association for Indian People 78,654
113 37 NC Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians 200,709
114 37 NC Guilford Native American Association 64,199
115 37 NC Haliwa-Saponi Tribe, Inc. 63,302
116 37 NC Lumbee Regional Development Association 949,828
117 37 NC Metrolina Native American Association 85,176
118 37 NC North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs 248,698
119 38 ND Spirit Lake Sioux Tribe 142,073
120 38 ND Standing Rock Sioux Tribe 214,331
121 38 ND Three Affiliated Tribes - Ft. Berthold Reservation 178,335
122 38 ND Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians 329,245
123 38 ND United Tribes Technical College 204,621
124 39 OH North America Indian Cultural Centers 490,893
125 40 OK Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 23,523
126 40 OK Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma 1,257,379
127 40 OK Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes 199,433
128 40 OK Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma 448,939
129 40 OK Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma 651,089
130 40 OK Citizen Band Potawatomi Indians of Oklahoma 355,507
131 40 OK Comanche Tribe of Oklahoma 150,390
132 40 OK Creek Nation of Oklahoma 587,882
ATTACHMENT 2
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Comprehensive Services for Native Americans
PY 2005 Allotments
State Grantee Total
Appropriation Total $54,237,600
TAT 540,000
Grantee Total 53,697,600
133 40 OK Four Tribes Consortium of Oklahoma 117,653
134 40 OK Inter-Tribal Council of N.E. Oklahoma 74,197
135 40 OK Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma 185,237
136 40 OK Native American Resource Center 303,643
137 40 OK Osage Tribal Council 109,384
138 40 OK OTOE-Missouria Tribe of Oklahoma 37,188
139 40 OK Pawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 39,389
140 40 OK Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma 90,705
141 40 OK Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 114,994
142 40 OK Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma 65,941
143 40 OK United Urban Indian Council, Inc. 466,031
144 40 OK Wyandotte Tribe of Oklahoma 104,689
145 41 OR Confed. Tribes of Siletz Indians of Orego 463,989
146 41 OR Confed. Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Res 33,366
147 41 OR Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs 113,759
148 41 OR Organization of Forgotten Americans 321,208
149 42 PA Council of Three Rivers 885,572
150 44 RI Rhode Island Indian Council 255,151
151 45 SC South Carolina Indian Development Council, Inc. 200,425
152 46 SD Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe 220,981
153 46 SD Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 50,366
154 46 SD Oglala Sioux Tribe 629,778
155 46 SD Rosebud Sioux Tribe 474,584
156 46 SD Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe 139,654
157 46 SD United Sioux Tribe Development Corp. 511,258
158 46 SD Yankton Sioux Tribe 102,113
159 48 TX Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribal Council 737,412
160 48 TX Dallas Inter-Tribal Center 345,622
161 48 TX Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 509,582
162 49 UT Indian Training & Education Center 397,133
163 49 UT Ute Indian Tribe 113,678
164 50 VT Abenaki Self-Help Association/ NH Ind. Counc. 97,455
165 51 VA Mattaponi Pamunkey Monacan Consortium 229,833
166 53 WA American Indian Community Center 429,385
167 53 WA Colville Confederated Tribes 171,735
168 53 WA Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Nation 201,525
169 53 WA Lummi Indian Business Council 103,327
170 53 WA Makah Tribal Council 31,002
171 53 WA Puyallup Tribe of Indians 129,365
172 53 WA Seattle Indian Center 304,991
173 53 WA The Tulalip Tribes 35,732
174 53 WA Western WA Indian Empl. and Trng Pgm. 638,481
175 55 WI Ho-Chunk Nation 173,683
176 55 WI Lac Courte Oreilles Tribal Governing Board 121,836
ATTACHMENT 2
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Comprehensive Services for Native Americans
PY 2005 Allotments
State Grantee Total
Appropriation Total $54,237,600
TAT 540,000
Grantee Total 53,697,600
177 55 WI Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 66,074
178 55 WI Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin 126,623
179 55 WI Oneida Tribe of Indians of WI, Inc. 164,371
180 55 WI Spotted Eagle, Inc. 211,331
181 55 WI Stockbridge-Munsee Community 59,619
182 55 WI Wisconsin Indian Consortium 115,918
183 56 WY Eastern Shoshone Tribe 128,047
184 56 WY Northern Arapaho Business Council 217,776
Attachment 3 (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2005/TEGL35-04_Attach3.pdf):
ATTACHMENT 3
GRANT SIGNATURE SHEET
WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT SECTION 166
INDIAN AND NATIVE AMERICAN PROGRAMS
GRANT MODIFICATION
NUMBER NUMBER
Grantee Name and Address:
Contact Phone No.:
This document: (check only one appropriate action)
A. Submits a new Two Year Plan for the period to ________
B. X Modifies the Two Year Plan for the period /01/05 to 06/30/06
Briefly describe the purpose of the action and attach supporting documents and/or narrative as needed.
Approved for the Grantee by:
Name:
Title:
Signature Date
Attachment 4 (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2005/TEGL35-04_Attach4.pdf):
ATTACHMENT-4
WIA PARTICIPANT AND COST PROJECTIONS WORKSHEET
Section 166
Indian and Native American Program
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration I
a. Grantee Name, Address, Phone Number: b. Date Submitted (Mo/Day/Yr) c. Grant Number
d. Grant Period e. Program Type
From: 07/01/2004 Adult
To: 06/30/2006
I. Projected Enrollment and Terminations (Cumulative Semi-annually)
Semi-Annual Semi-Annual
Year 1 Year 1 Year 2 Year 2
A. Total Participants
1. New Participants
2. Participants Carried Over from Previous Year
B. Total Terminations
1. Entered Employment with Enhancement
2. Entered Employment
3. Attained Employability Enhancement Only
4. All Other Terminations
C. Total Current Participants
II. Cost Projections (Cumulative Semi-annually)
Semi-annual Year 1 Year 1 Semi-annual Year 2 Year 2
A. Employment
B. Training
C. Other
D. Administration
E. Total Projected Costs
Comments:
Attachment 5 (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2005/TEGL35-04_Attach5.pdf):
ATTACHMENT-5
WIA PARTICIPANT AND COST PROJECTIONS WORKSHEET
Section 166
Indian and Native American Program
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration I
a. Grantee Name, Address, Phone Number: b. Date Submitted (Mo/Day/Yr) c. Grant Number
d. Grant Period e. Program Type
From: 07/01/2004 Youth
To: 06/30/2006
I. Projected Enrollment and Terminations (Cumulative Semi-annually)
Semi-Annual Semi-Annual
Year 1 Year 1 Year 2 Year 2
A. Total Participants
1. New Participants
2. Participants Carried Over from Previous Year
B. Total Terminations
1. Entered Employment with Enhancement
2. Entered Employment
3. Attained Employability Enhancement Only
4. All Other Terminations
C. Total Current Participants
II. Cost Projections (Cumulative Semi-annually)
Semi-annual Year 1 Year 1 Semi-annual Year 2 Year 2
A. Employment
B. Training
C. Other
D. Administration
E. Total Projected Costs
Comments:
Attachment 6 (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2005/TEGL35-04_Attach6.pdf):
ATTACHMENT-6
Note: This check list and worksheets are to be filled out and returned to DINAP with the CSP.
Performance Measures Checklist
PY: ______ Grantee: _____________________________
Menu of Measures
check three measures
At Least one measure must be selected from
the Employment or Training Category
TRAINING EMPLOYMENT COMMUNITY
1. Employability Enhancement 5. Entered Employment 10. Positive Termination
2. Basic Skills/GED Attainment 6. Wage Growth for Job at 11. Terminee Satisfaction
Placement
3. Youth Progress 7. Welfare-to-Work 12. Leverage Non-166
Resources
4. Occupational Skills Training 8. Job Placement for Long-Term 13. Job Creation
& Post Secondary Education Jobless
9. Job Retention
- OR -
Grantee-determined Measure(s)
Check box if you select this system
ATTACHMENT-6
Note: Calculation Worksheet is to be filled out and returned to DINAP as part of your CSP
Performance Measures Calculation Worksheet
Section I
Complete columns 1, 3 & 4 for the three measures chosen. Leave all other boxes blank.
1 2 3 4
Training Measures
If you select the Employability Enhancement measure, please check the box at the left and report the planned
number of terminees in the base and the planned number who will achieve success:
Success Factor: Number in the base (below) who complete at least one Planned Planned
of the five following enhancements: (1) enter non-Section 166 training Nos. Success
1. or training provided by another grantee, (2) return to full-time school,
(3) complete a major level of education, (4) complete worksite training __________ __________
objectives, (5) attain basic or occupational skills proficiency (Success/Base)
A minimum of
28% is required
Base Number: All terminees
_______
If you select the Basic Skills/GED Attainment measure, please check the box at the left and report the planned
number of terminees in the base and the planned number who will achieve success:
Success Factor: Number in the base (below) who either: (1) increase
their reading or math skills by at least two grade levels or the __________ __________
2. equivalent, (2) attain their GED, high school equivalency degree or
high school diploma, (3) are out-of-school youth who return to school (Success/Base)
A minimum of
60% is required
Base Number: Number of terminees who participated in basic skills
(ABE) or GED training ________
If you select the Youth Progress measure, please check the box at the left and report the planned number of
terminees in the base and the planned number who will achieve success:
Success Factor: Number in the base (below) who show progress and
improved skills by attaining at least two of: (1) complete job readiness
3. or VEP, (2) complete career assessment, (3) secure unsubsidized
employment or enlist, (4) participate in youth services that result in (a)
__________ __________
returning to school, (b) remaining in school, or (c) enrolling in Job
(Success/Base)
A minimum of
Corps, (5) improve basic skills by advancing at least two grade levels 60% is required
in reading or math or attaining a GED or high school diploma, (6)
complete occupational skills training
Base Number: Number of terminees ages 14-21 at the time of
__________
enrollment
ATTACHMENT-6
If you select the Occupational Skills Classroom Training or Post-secondary Education measure from the menu,
please check the box at the left and report the planned number of terminees in the base and the planned number
who will achieve success:
Planned Planned
Success Factor: Number in the base (below) with documented
Success
completion of occupational skills classroom training or post-secondary Nos.
4. education, resulting in a degree, certificate, or apprenticeship.
__________
__________
(Success/Base)
A minimum of
60% is required
Base Number: Number of terminees who were enrolled in occupational
skills classroom training or post-secondary education. ________
Employment Measures
If you select the Entered Employment measure, please check the box at the left and report the planned number of
terminees in the base and the planned number who will achieve success:
5. Success Factor: Number in the base (below) who enter unsubsidized
employment at termination ________ __________
(Success/Base)
See Attachment
2A for the
required minimum
Base Number: All terminees
________
If you select the Wage Growth for Job at Placement measure, please check the box at the left and report the
planned number of terminees in the base and the planned number who will achieve success:
Success Factor: Number in the base (below) whose wage at termination
exceeds their pre-program wage by at least 10%. Pre-program wage is __________ __________
6. the wage of the last job held in the 12 months before enrollment
(Success/Base)
A minimum of
25% is required
Base Number: Number of terminees who entered employment at
termination and who had a job in the 12 months before enrollment __________
If you select the Welfare to Work measure, please check the box at the left and report the planned number of
terminees in the base and the planned number who will achieve success:
Success Factor: Number in the base (below) who enter unsubsidized
7. employment at termination ________ __________
(Success/Base)
A minimum of
25% is required
Base Number: Number of terminees who were public assistance
recipients at enrollment, including those receiving assistance under __________
TANF, General Assistance, or Food Stamps/commodities
ATTACHMENT-6
If you select the Job Placement for Long-Term Jobless measure, please check the box at the left and report the
planned number of terminees in the base and the planned number who will achieve success:
Success Factor: Number in the base (below) who enter unsubsidized Planned Planned
8. employment at termination Nos. Success
________ ___________
(Success/Base)
A minimum of 25%
is required
Base Number: Number of terminees who have been unemployed or out
of the labor force for 15 out of the 26 weeks prior to enrollment __________
If you select the Job Retention measure, please check the box at the left and report the planned number of
terminees in the base and the planned number who will achieve success:
Success Factor: Number in the base (below) who are employed for at
least 20 hours per week for 12 out of the 13 weeks following ___________
9. termination _________ (Success/Base)
A minimum of 25%
is required
Base Number: Number of terminees who enter unsubsidized
employment at termination and had been enrolled in occupational skills _________
classroom training or on-the-job training while a program participant
Community Measures
If you select the Positive Termination measure, please check the box at the left and report the planned number of
terminees in the base and the planned number who will achieve success:
10. Success Factor: Number in the base (below) who either enter
unsubsidized employment at termination or attain an employability __________ ___________
enhancement (Success/Base)
See Attachment 2B
included for the
required minimum
Base Number: All terminees
__________
ATTACHMENT-6
If you select the Terminee Satisfaction measure, please check the box at the left and report the planned number of
terminees in the base and the planned number who will achieve success: [See Attached Example]
Success Factor: Number in the base (below) who rate their satisfaction
Planned Planned
with services as “satisfactory” or “very satisfactory” (See Nos. Success
11. recommended survey instrument included in the instructions)
________ __________
(Success/Base)
A minimum of 66%
is required
______________
(Row 2/Row 3)
A minimum of 75%
is required
Base for the Measure: Number of terminees who responded to the
survey (Note: at least 75% of all terminees must respond to the survey).
________
Base for Calculating Response Rate: All terminees _________
If you select the Leverage Non-166 Resources measure, please check the box at the left and report the planned amount
of leveraged resources and anticipated amount of the Section 166 annual allocation:
Success Factor: The dollar value of 166 financial or in-kind
contributions to the Section 166 program and/or non-166 funded
services provided to participants, including the following: (1) non-166
12. contracts or grants that are not formula funded, (2) donated services or
services provided by other agencies not paid for from the Section 166
$_________ $_________
(Success/Base)
grant, (3) donated equipment, (4) slots provided by WIA Title I, (5) A minimum of 20%
tuition waivers, (6) support services not paid for through the Section 166 is required
grant. (Note: in-kind contributions must be converted to their
approximate dollar equivalent)
Base Amount: Anticipated amount of the grantee’s Section 166 annual
allocation, in dollars $_________
If you select the Job Creation measure, please check the box at the left and report the planned number of
terminees in the base and the planned number of new jobs created
Success Factor: Number of new jobs created in Native-American owned
13. businesses as a result of the grantee’s services, including micro-
enterprises and self-employment
__________ __________
(Success/Base)
A minimum of 5%
is required
Base Number: All terminees
________
ATTACHMENT-6
GRANTEE DETERMINED MEASURES WORKSHEET
SECTION II
Grantees may be as creative as possible in developing their own performance based system as long as
the plan meets the following ETA guidelines. Each grantee must give a detailed description of the
following:
1. The rationale for the proposed measure(s) [i.e. benchmarks, goals, etc.]
2. How successful performance will be measured [in quantifiable terms].
3. How many participants will be served each program year
4. How the community will be enhanced
5. How the grantee proposes to track and report on its performance against the measures in
its system.
Attachment 7 (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2005/TEGL35-04_Attach7.pdf):
ATTACHMENT-7
Supplemental Youth Services
Menu of Goals
Minimum Performance Requirement - at least 60% of Indian and Native American (INA) youth
enrolled in the Supplemental Youth Services program for the program year must attain a minimum of
(2) two of the (13) thirteen goals listed.
1. Completed Job/Readiness/Orientation to the World 7. Enrolled in Job Corps
of Work Training
8 . Improved Basic Skills Level by At Least Two Grades
2. Completed Internship or Vocational Exploration
Exploration Program 9. Attained High School Diploma
3. Completed Career Assessment 10. Attained GED
4. Entered Unsubsidized Employment (including 11. Completed Occupational Skills Training
entering the military)
12. Completed Leadership and/or Soft Skills Training
5. Remained in School
13. Entered Other (Non-Supplemental Youth) Training
6. Returned to School Full Time Program
At the end of the program year, DINAP will determine whether a grantee successfully attained their
performance goals for the program year.
ATTACHMENT-7
Supplemental Youth Services Calculation Worksheet
Grantee:
Performance Goals Planned
Success
1. Completed Job/Readiness/Orientation to Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
the World of Work Training will complete, during the course of their program participation, a course of
instruction relating to job readiness or world of work skills, including
training to develop positive work habits, attitudes and behavior, such as
punctuality, regular attendance, presenting a neat appearance, getting along
and working well with others, exhibiting good conduct, following
instructions and completing tasks, accepting constructive criticism from
supervisors and co-workers, showing initiative and reliability, and assuming
the responsibilities involved in maintaining a job. This category also entails
developing an awareness of the labor market and occupational information,
and job search techniques, including preparing resumes and applications and
improving interviewing techniques.
2. Completed Internship or Vocational Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
Exploration Program will complete, during the course of their program participation, a work
internship or a vocational exploration program designed to provide exposure
to alternative career areas.
3. Completed Career Assessment Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
will complete, during the course of their program participation, a formal
career assessment of occupational interests, values, skills, or aptitudes,
leading to an identification of careers for which the participant may be
suited.
4. Entered Unsubsidized Employment Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
(including entering the military) upon termination, will enter non-WIA funded employment, including entry
into the Armed Forces or self-employment.
5. Remained in School Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
are at-risk of dropping out of school but, will be retained in school as a
result of continuing active participation in the Supplemental Youth program.
6. Returned to School Full Time Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
at intake, were not attending school (exclusive of summer), and had not
obtained a high school diploma or equivalent and will return to full-time
secondary school (e.g., junior high school, middle school, and high school)
including alternative school as a result of participating in the Supplemental
Youth program.
7. Enrolled in Job Corps Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
will enroll in Job Corps upon terminating from the Supplemental Youth
Services Program.
8. Improved Basic Skills Level by At Least Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
Two Grades will advance at least two grade levels in either reading or math skills.
[Note: Skill gain must be achieved through active program participation and
must be documented through standardized testing].
9. Attained High School Diploma Enter the number of at-risk youth participants, enrolled for the program
year, who will attain a State-recognized high school diploma while enrolled
in the Supplemental Youth Program as a result of program participation.
10. Attained GED Enter the number of at-risk youth participants, enrolled for the program
year, who will attain a State-recognized GED while enrolled in the
Supplemental Youth Program as a result of program participation.
11. Completed Occupational Skills Training Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
will complete occupational skills training while enrolled in the
Supplemental Youth Program as a result of program participation. [Note:
occupational skills training includes (1) vocational education and (2) on-the-
job training].
ATTACHMENT-7
Performance Goals Planned
Success
12. Completed Leadership and/or Soft Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
Skills Training will complete during the course of their program participation a course of
instruction that is intended to impart skills in leadership or personal skills,
such as developing motivation and adaptability, obtaining effective coping
and problem-solving skills, acquiring an improved self image, clarifying
values and developing personal understanding. [Note: This category also
includes providing exposure to post-secondary educational opportunities;
community and service learning projects; peer-centered activities, including
peer mentoring and tutoring; organizational and team work training,
including team leadership training; training in decision-making, including
determining priorities; citizenship training, including life skills training such
as parenting and budgeting of resources; and positive social behaviors].
13. Entered Other (Non-Supplemental Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
Youth) Training Program will enter other training, including occupational skills training or
postsecondary education, using funds other than those from the INA
Supplemental Youth Services Program which builds upon and does not
duplicate training received under Section 166.
14. Attain at Least Two Goals Enter the number of participants, enrolled for the program year, who will
attain at least two goals.
15. Total
servedNumber of Participants to be Enter the total number of participants to be served for the program year,
including terminees, and youth carried over to the next program year.
Note: Calculation Worksheet is to be filled out and returned to DINAP as part of your CSP.
What does federal law require today?
This guidance has been withdrawn. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace