Native American workforce plan extension
Is this still the rule?
This document has been withdrawn. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.
Accessible letter PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2010/TEGL29-09acc.pdf
CLASSIFICATION
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING WIA/Planning/Section 166
ADMINISTRATION ADVISORY SYSTEM CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OWI/DAS/INAP
Washington, D.C. 20210 DATE
June 8, 2010
ADVISORY: TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO. 29-09
TO: ALL SECTION 166 INDIAN AND NATIVE AMERICAN GRANTEES
FROM: JANE OATES /s/
Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT: One-Year Extension of the Program Year (PY) 2008-2009 Two-Year
Strategic Plan for the Workforce Investment Act (WIA), Indian and
Native American Program for PY 2010.
1. Purpose. The purpose of this Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) is to
notify Indian and Native American grantees of the Employment and Training
Administration’s (ETA) decision to provide designated grantees with the option to extend
the two-year Comprehensive Services Program (CSP) plan and Supplemental Youth
Services Program (SYSP) plan through PY 2010. The reason for extending the current
two-year plan is to align the Native American Program’s planning cycle with the State
Workforce System’s planning cycle (State Workforce strategic plans have been extended
for one additional PY). This will allow better coordination between the States and the
Native American Program when developing partnerships and negotiating Memorandums of
Understanding. In addition, the Department of Labor (DOL) is anticipating the
reauthorization of WIA within the next year which may require the two-year strategic plans
to be modified again.
NOTE: An extension to the two-year strategic plan is contingent upon your organization
being designated as a WIA, Section 166 grantee for PY 2010-2011, pursuant to Solicitation
for Grant Application (SGA) No. SGA-DFA-PY-09-04, which was published in the
Federal Register on March 12, 2010. Incumbent grantees that are not selected as WIA
Section 166 grantees for PY 2010-2011 will not receive PY 2010 funds and, therefore, do
not need a 2010 plan. Such entities must discontinue services on June 30, 2010, unless the
entity receives a “no cost” grant extension from the Grant Officer. The Grant Officer will
notify each entity, in writing, of its designation status no later than June 30, 2010.
RESCISSIONS: EXPIRATION DATE:
None Continuing
2
New entities designated through the SGA process will be required to submit a one-year
plan for PY 2010. Upon notification of designation, new grantees will receive planning
instructions along with required planning documents.
2. References.
a. Section 166 of WIA located at:
http://www.doleta.gov/dinap/cfml/wiapage.cfm;
b. Regulations implementing the WIA Section 166 Indian and Native American Program
located at: http://www.doleta.gov/dinap/cfml/wiapage.cfm;
c. TEGL 17-05, Common Measures Policy for the ETA’s Performance
Accountability System and Related Performance Issues located at:
http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=2195;
d. DINAP Bulletin 99-05, Administrative Costs Limitations under the WIA located at:
http://www.doleta.gov/dinap/bulletins/99-05.cfm;
e. TEGL 16-08, Guidance for Implementation of WIA Funding in the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 as required by Subtitle D, Section 166, Native
American Program located at:
http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=2731;
f. TEGL 5-09, Reporting Guidance and Instructions for the WIA, Section 166, Indian and
Native American (INA) Program Supplemental Youth Services Program, including
Performance Accountability Reporting for the ARRA at:
http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=2803; and
g. TEGL 21-09, Instructions for Submitting WIA and Wagner-Peyser Act State Plans and
Waiver Requests for Program Year 2010 located at:
http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=2885.
3. Background. All Section 166 two-year plans currently in effect will expire on June 30,
2010. WIA and the implementing regulations require Section 166 grantees to submit a
two-year CSP, including, if applicable, an SYSP that is approved by ETA in order to
receive PY 2010 funds. Because the State Workforce System’s planning cycle has been
extended for one additional PY, a similar extension is being provided to existing Section
166 plans in order to improve coordination between the State Workforce Systems and
Section 166 grantees. Therefore, ETA is providing two options to extend or modify current
plans in order to enable Section 166 grantees to have an approved plan in place for PY
2010, without submitting a “full” two-year plan. If WIA is reauthorized and requires
changes to the INA grantee plans, ETA will issue subsequent guidance on implementing
any new requirements. ETA will also issue subsequent guidance on planning requirements
for PY 2011.
Accordingly, upon an organization’s “designation” as a Section 166 grantee for PY 2010-
2011, the Grant Officer will automatically process and issue unilateral grant modifications
to add PY 2010 funds to Section 166 CSP and SYSP grants, unless a grantee initiates a
3
request to modify their current two-year strategic plan. Any modifications to the current
two-year strategic plan will require prior ETA approval before PY 2010 funds can be added
to the existing WIA grant. The two options -- extension and modification -- are discussed
in item No. 4 below.
4. Section 166 Designated Grantee Options for PY 2010. There are two options for current
grantees to secure approval of their CSP and SYSP plan for PY 2010, the first year of the
new PY 2010-2011 two-year planning cycle -- July 1, 2010-June 30, 2011.
A. Option I: ETA Approves an Extension of the Current Section 166 Grantee CSP
and SYSP Plans for an Additional Year, Through PY 2010 (July 1, 2010- June 30,
2011).
As noted above, WIA and the implementing regulations require Section 166 grantees
to have an approved plan in place in order to receive Section 166 allotments. ETA
will consider this legislative requirement met by approving an extension of the
current plan for an additional PY for current Section 166 grantees who do not wish to
change their current plan.
Procedure for Option 1: In order to avoid placing unnecessary burden on Section
166 grantees, Section 166 grantees do not need to submit anything in order to have
their plan approved for an extension of one additional PY. Unless a Section 166
grantee elects to modify its plan, ETA will approve an extension of the existing plan
for an additional PY. By June 30, 2010, ETA will send Section 166 grantees who do
not request modification a letter approving an extension of the existing CSP and
SYSP plans for the period, July 1, 2010 - June 30, 2011.
B. Option II: ETA Reviews and Approves the Plan Modification Submitted by
Section 166 Grantee for PY 2010 (July 1, 2010 – June 30, 2011).
1. Pursuant to 20 C.F.R. 668.750, Section 166 grantees may request approval from
ETA to modify a plan to add, expand, delete, or diminish any service allowable under
the regulations. Any Section 166 grantee that wishes to modify its current plan
instead of receiving approval for an extension of its current plan, must submit a plan
modification for the period of PY 2010, i.e., from July 1, 2010 - June 30, 2011, by
June 30, 2010. As noted above, ETA will issue subsequent guidance on planning
requirements for PY 2011.
2. Grantees must request a modification to their current two-year plan if significant
changes are planned or circumstances require significant changes to the scope,
purpose, or design of the grant, such as:
a. An expectation that the total number of participants to be served
annually will be reduced by a number which exceeds 25 percent of
the participants previously proposed to be served, or by 25
participants, whichever is larger;
b. A change in the grantee’s service area resulting from the designation
process described in the SGA;
4
c. A significantly different approach in providing services to
participants than what is currently described in the two-year plan;
d. A determination that the strategy provided in the current two-year
plan is not meeting the workforce needs of the community;
e. Shifts in the local labor market and/or employer demands (such as
job skill training) which require a strategy that is significantly
different from the current approved plan;
f. A change in the efficiency level provided in the PY 2008-2009
strategic plan;
g. A change in the way ARRA funds will be used; or
h. A change in the administrative cost limit that was approved in the
PY 2008-2009 plan.
Grantees that are uncertain whether a change to their two-year strategic plan will require
a modification should contact their Federal Project Officer.
Procedure for Option II: To modify the existing two-year strategic plan,
grantees must submit the following items by June 30, 2010:
1. A signed cover letter that identifies the items in the existing plan that
the grantee is requesting to change;
2. Three copies of the Grant Signature Sheet with original signatures
(See Attachment A);
3. A revised planning narrative or administrative cost limit justification;
and
4. A revised Attachment C included in this TEGL.
5. Period of Performance. The PY 2008–2009 two-year strategic plan will be unilaterally
extended for an additional PY which will cover the period July 1, 2010 - June 30, 2011.
Grantees should be aware that SYSP funds were not available in their grantee subaccount
on April 1st, however, grantees may use “carryover” funds from previous PYs (if available)
to implement the SYSP. Grantees that do not have carryover funds from previous PYs may
use other (nonrestricted) resources to begin operating a SYSP and reimburse the resource
for allowable costs (retroactive to April 1st) when funds become available in grantee
subaccounts.
However, grantees should be aware that issuance of a formal commitment or obligation of
DOL funds will only occur when a Notice of Obligation has been issued by the Grant
Officer and after grantee designation. Grantees that do not receive an official
“designation” letter from the Grant Office or that have been “conditionally” designated
5
have a greater risk of not being reimbursed for funds that have been used for their WIA
Program.
6. PY 2010 Funding Allocations. The PY 2010 appropriation levels for the Section 166 CSP
are $52,758,000 and $13,861,035 for the SYSP. The allotments on Attachments D and E
of this TEGL are for planning purposes only and are not an official commitment/obligation
by DOL and do not reflect any changes that may occur as a result of the recent SGA.
Tribes and Tribal organizations that have been designated as a Section 166 grantee will
receive an official Notice of Obligation from the Grant Officer.
7. Unspent Funds from Prior Program Years. The INA Program continues to emphasize
full utilization of WIA funds by grantees. While some improvement has been made, some
grantees continue to have large amounts of unspent funds remaining at the end of the PY.
Considering the high unemployment rate and the skills gap that exists among many Native
Americans, it is in the best interest of the WIA Section 166 community to reallocate
excessive carryover funds.
During PY 2010, ETA and the Employment and Training Council will develop policy to
implement the WIA regulations at 20 C.F.R., Section 668.296(d) that allow the reallocation
of carry-in that is in excess of 20 percent of the total funds available. A TEGL will be
released later in the year that will explain the recapture and redistribution process in further
detail.
8. Adult Common Measures - Levels of Performance. TEGL 17-05 established the
following three performance outcomes for the INA Program: 1) Entered Employment Rate
(EER); 2) Retention Rate and; 3) Average Earnings. Grantees are expected to meet the
minimum level of performance for each of these three goals. The minimum standards of
performance on the EER are established using a regression model developed by Social
Policy Research Associates (SPRA) which takes into consideration the economic
conditions in the grantee’s geographic service area and the socioeconomic characteristics of
the participants served in the previous PY. Currently, the EER is the only measure for
which minimum levels of performance have been established. Attachment B provides an
example of a Performance Standard Worksheet for the EER. Since levels of performance
are specific to each grantee, SPRA will post the actual Performance Standard Worksheet
for the EER for all grantees on the INA Program’s new Community of Practice website
located at: http://ina.workforce3one.org/page/performance_measures.
The INA Program has not established minimum levels of performance for Retention Rate
or Average Earnings. Until minimum levels of performance can be established for these
two measures, grantees should strive to meet the PY 2010 national targets which are:
1) Retention Rate - 74.9 percent; and
2) Average Earnings - $9,245.
Since the national targets for the retention rate and average earnings are not adjusted for
each grantee’s local economic conditions, grantees that do not meet the national targeted
level will not be considered as having “failed” these two measures.
6
In addition to the common measures, OMB has placed an emphasis on efficiency for all
Federal programs. Grantees were required to provide an efficiency level in the PY 2008 -
2009 strategic plan using Attachment C. Unless a modification is submitted to request a
change in the efficiency level, the level established in the PY 2008–2009 two-year strategic
plan will remain in effect for PY 2010.
9. Youth Measures - Levels of Performance.
On September 4, 2009, ETA released TEGL 5-09 which revised the SYSP report
(ETA form 9085). The revised report established the following two measures for the
SYSP Program:
1) Attainment of Two or More Goals; and
2) Educational Attainment for Dropouts.
The Attainment of Two or More Goals measure existed under the previous youth reporting
form with a level of performance of 60 percent. The Educational Attainment for Dropouts
measure has been calculated at the national level; however, levels of performance for
individual grantees have never been established. In order to establish individual levels of
performance, a regression model must be developed which takes into consideration the
participant characteristics that each grantee serves.
Until a regression model can be developed for the Educational Attainment for Dropouts
measure, grantees are encouraged to strive for a 60 percent level of performance.
However, grantees that do not meet the 60 percent level of performance will not be
considered as having “failed” this measure.
In addition, TEGL 5-09 revised the SYSP report (ETA form 9085) to include
data elements relevant to ARRA - including the following performance indicators:
1) Work Readiness Attainment Rate; and
2) Summer Employment Completion Rate.
ARRA only required a “Work Readiness” indicator for the INA youth funding; therefore,
a goal of 63 percent was established for this measure. The “Summer Employment
Completion Rate” is an additional performance indicator that was not required by ARRA
and, therefore, a goal was not established for this measure.
10. ARRA Youth Funding (as applicable). As indicated in TEGL 16-08, the purpose of
ARRA is to stimulate the Nation’s economy and provide quick assistance to those impacted
by the economic downturn. To meet this purpose, INA grantees were instructed to quickly
use ARRA funding - consistent with prudent management - to provide youth with
educational opportunities and increased summer employment. In addition, TEGL 16-08
strongly encouraged grantees to use as much of the ARRA funding as possible during the
summer of 2009.
As of December 31, 2009, a substantial amount of INA’s ARRA youth funding remained
unspent. These unspent ARRA funds will soon be supplemented by the PY 2010 SYSP
allocation. NOTE: It is important for grantees that have unspent ARRA funds at the
7
beginning of the summer to substantially increase the number of youth served and
expand summer employment or training services. The INA Program is requesting
that all grantees fully expend their ARRA funds by September 30, 2010. ARRA
funding is to be spent concurrently with - and not in lieu of - any prior year/carryover funds
or the new PY 2010 funding.
TEGL 16-08 required grantees to modify their PY 2008-2009 plan to incorporate ARRA
funds. Therefore, grantees wishing to modify the way in which ARRA funds are used must
modify their two-year strategic plan using the procedures identified in item No. 4B above.
11. Administrative Cost Limit. The administrative cost limit approved in the PY 2008–2009
plan will remain in effect for PY 2010. However, grantees may submit a modification to
their PY 2008–2009 plan and request to change their administrative cost limit. Grantees
that request to increase the administrative cost limit above the 15 percent limit must
provide justification per DINAP Bulletin 99-05.
12. Waivers. WIA Section 166(h)(3) permits waivers of any statutory or regulatory
requirement except for those areas cited in 20 C.F.R. 668.920. A waiver can be requested
at any time. When submitting a waiver, grantees must follow the WIA regulations at
20 C.F.R. 661.420(c). Waiver approvals require a separate process and, therefore, should
not be included in a plan modification.
13. Acquisition of Equipment. Grant Officer approval is required prior to the acquisition of
equipment that has a useful life of more than one-year and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or
more per unit pursuant to OMB Circulars A-102 [29 C.F.R. 97.33] and A-110 [29 C.F.R.
95.2 (n)]. Approval of equipment is a separate process; therefore, grantees must submit
requests for the purchase of equipment separately. These requests cannot be included in a
modification.
14. Tools and Resources. The INA Program, in partnership with the Native American
Advisory Council’s Information Technology Workgroup, created a Native American
“Community of Practice” website to provide Native American Workforce Professionals
with useful information on administering a Native American WIA grant. We encourage
INA grantees to visit this website to obtain helpful information on managing an INA WIA
grant -including guidance on the two-year planning process. The Web site is:
http://ina.workforce3one.org/.
15. Action Requested. Action is required only if a grantee requests a modification to the
PY 2008-2009 plan in accordance with item No. 4B above. If a grantee is designated as a
Section 166 grantee for PY 2010 through the recent competitive process, and does not
submit a request for modification to the existing grant by June 30, 2010, the Grant Officer
will automatically issue a unilateral modification to add PY 2010 funds to the current grant,
which must be spent in accordance with the terms of the extended plan. Grantees that plan
to make significant changes to their service delivery must submit a request for a
modification using the guidance provided in item No. 4B above. Modifications must be
submitted to the INA Program office by close of business June 30, 2010. Modifications
must be approved by the Grant Officer before PY 2010 funds can be obligated. Please
submit modifications to the following address:
8
U.S. Department of Labor
Indian and Native American Program
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Room S-4209
Washington, D.C. 20210
ATTN: MIS-CSP DESK
16. Inquiries. Please direct questions to your designated Federal Project Officer provided
below.
Andrea Brown (East) (202) 693-3736 Duane Hall (Midwest) (972) 850-4637
Craig Lewis (Midwest) (202) 693-3384 Guy Suetopka (West) (415) 625-7988
Dawn Anderson (Midwest) (202) 693-3745 Si Seciwa (West) (415) 625-7987
17. Attachments. Attachments A and C must be included when requesting a modification to
the PY 2008-2009 plan. NOTE: The attachments below are only required if a
modification is being requested. Do not submit the documents below if a modification is
not being requested (See item No. 4 and item No.15 above).
Attachment A: Grant Signature Sheet
Attachment C: Participant Planning, Efficiency and Outcomes Worksheet
The Following Attachments are for Information Only:
Attachment B: Example of EER Performance Standard Worksheet
Attachment D: Draft SYSP Allotments
Attachment E: Draft CSP Allotments
Attachment 1 (official PDF): https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2010/TEGL29-09a1.pdf
Attachment A
GRANT SIGNATURE SHEET
WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT SECTION 166
INDIAN AND NATIVE AMERICAN PROGRAMS
GRANT MODIFICATION
NUMBER _________________________________ NUMBER _________________
Grantee Name and Address:
Contact Phone No.:
This document: (check only one appropriate action)
A. Submits a new Two Year Plan for the period _________ to _________ _
B. X Modifies the current Two Year Plan to incorporate Program Year 2010 funds
Briefly describe the purpose of the action and attach supporting documents and/or narrative as needed.
Modifies the PY 2008 – 2009 Two-Year plan to incorporate PY 2010 funds.____________
___________________________________________________________
Approved for the Grantee by:
Name:
Title:
Signature Date
Attachment 2 (official PDF): https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2010/TEGL29-09a2.pdf
ATTACHMENT B
Example of EER Performance Standard Worksheet
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| | | |
| PY 10 WIA Performance Standards Worksheet | A. Grantee's Name: | B. Grantee's Number: |
| for Indian and Native American Grantees | (grantee name here) | State -- Grantee ID |
|____________________________________________________|________________________________|___________________________|
| | | |
| C. Type of Standard: | D. Date Calculated: |E. Performance Measure: |
| [X] Initial [ ] Final | 01/25/10 | ENTERED EMPLOYMENT RATE |
|______________________________________|_______________________________________|__________________________________|
| | | | | |
| F. Local Factors |G. Factor|H. Average |I. Differ- |J. Weights |K. Effect of |
| | Values| Service | ence | | Local Factors |
| | | Levels |(G Minus H)| | on Performance |
| | | or Local | | | Expectations, |
| | | Conditions| | | (I Times J) |
|_______________________________________________________________________________________________________|
| | | | | | |
| 1. % Aged 14 to 21 | 14.5 | 23.2 | -8.7 | -0.135 | 1.2 |
| | | | | | |
| 2. % School Dropouts | 12.1 | 23.0 | -10.9 | -0.074 | 0.8 |
| | | | | | |
| 3. % Public Assistance Recipients | 53.9 | 40.8 | 13.1 | -0.075 | -1.0 |
| | | | | | |
| 5. % Employed in Manufacturing | 4.6 | 10.8 | -6.2 | 0.672 | -4.1 |
| | | | | | |
| 6. Native American Joblessness Rate | 67.7 | 47.3 | 20.4 | -0.421 | -8.6 |
| | | | | | |
| 7. Pct Families in Agriculture | 0.8 | 1.9 | -1.1 | -2.199 | 2.4 |
| | | | | | |
|_______________________________________________________________________________________________________|
| | |
| L. Total Adjustments | -9.3 |
|_________________________________|__________________|
| | |
NOTE: FACTOR VALUES IN COLUMN G ARE | M. Departure Point | + 56.0 |
DERIVED FROM PY 08 |_________________________________|__________________|
| | |
| N. Recommended Performance | |
RANGE ADJUSTMENT IS BASED ON | Goal (L + M) | 46.7 |
330 TERMINEES IN PY 08 |_________________________________|__________________|
| | |
| O. Range Adjustment | 16.8 |
|_________________________________|__________________|
| | |
| P. Performance Standard | |
| (Minimally Acceptable Level: | 29.9 |
| N Minus O) | |
|_________________________________|__________________|
Attachment 3 (official PDF): https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2010/TEGL29-09a3.pdf
ATTACHMENT C
COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES PROGRAM
Grantee:
Section I: Total Funds Available
Section I. Total Funds Available Funding
1. PY 2008 Funding (See Attachment H)
2. Estimated carry-over from prior program years
3. Total Funds Available
Sections II, III, IV & V: Total Participants, Customers and Exiters
a. b. c.
Section II. Estimated Participants, Funding and Efficiency Participants Funding Efficiency
1. Number of New Participants Enrolled in the Program for PY 2010
2. Participants Carried Over from the Previous program year
3. Total Participants, Funding and Efficiency (w/out self service customers)
Section III. Estimated Self Service "Customers"
4. Number of Customers that Receive Self Services Only for PY 2010 0 0
Section IV. Efficiency - Participants and Self Service Customers
5. Total Participants, Funding and Efficiency (with self service customers)
Section V. Estimated Exiters
6. Number of participants in line II.3 above that will exit in PY 2010
Section VI: Activities and Costs
Section VI. Estimated Participants, Funding and Efficiency Participants Costs
1. CRT - Job Skills
2. CRT - Basic Education
3. Work Experience
4. On-the-Job Training
5. Supportive Services
6. Training Assistance
7. Administrative Costs
8. Total Participants and costs
Section VII: Common Measures Performance Outcomes
Section VII. a. b. c.
Numerator
Common Measures Numerator Denominator Entered Retention Average
Denominator
Projected Outcomes Emp. Rate Rate Earnings
Employed qtr. after exit
1. Entered Employment Rate
Exiters during PY 2010
Emp. 2nd and 3rd qtr. after exit
2. Retention Rate
Exiters during PY 2010
Earnings 2 nd and 3rd qtr.
3. Average Earnings #DIV/0!
Exiters during PY 2010
Attachment 4 (official PDF): https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2010/TEGL29-09a4.pdf
`Estimates For Planning Purposes Only ATTACHMENT D
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Supplemental Youth Services for Native Americans
PY 2010 Allotments
Total $13,861,035
Grant Award
State Grantee Name Type Amount
AL Inter-Tribal Council of Alabama 5,098
AL Poarch Band of Creek Indians 0
AK Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Association 477 12,073
AK Association of Village Council Presidents 477 165,274
AK Bristol Bay Native Association 477 48,294
AK Central Council of Tlingit and Haida 477 68,417
AK Chugachmiut 477 5,902
AK Cook Inlet Tribal Council 477 147,030
AK Copper River Native Association 477 9,390
AK Kawerak Incorporated 477 60,368
AK Kenaitze Indian Tribe 22,806
AK Kodiak Area Native Association 477 9,390
AK Maniilaq Association Inc. 477 52,319
AK Metlakatla Indian Community 477 5,366
AK Orutsararmuit Native Council 477 16,098
AK Tanana Chiefs Conference, Inc. 477 114,028
AZ American Indian Association of Tucson 0
AZ Colorado River Indian Tribes 32,196
AZ Gila River Indian Community 211,959
AZ Hopi Tribal Council 118,053
AZ Hualapai Tribe 20,123
AZ Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. 38,367
AZ Native Americans for Community Action 0
AZ Navajo Nation 3,077,429
AZ Pasqua Yaqui Tribe 55,002
AZ Phoenix Indian Center, Inc. 0
AZ Quechan Indian Tribe 17,440
`Estimates For Planning Purposes Only ATTACHMENT D
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Supplemental Youth Services for Native Americans
PY 2010 Allotments
Total $13,861,035
Grant Award
State Grantee Name Type Amount
AZ Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Council 52,319
AZ San Carlos Apache Tribe 222,691
AZ Tohono O'Odham Nation 477 224,033
AZ White Mountain Apache Tribe 266,961
AR American Indian Center of Arkansas, Inc. 0
CA California Indian Manpower Consortium, Inc. TBD
CA Candelaria American Indian Council 0
CA Indian Human Resources Center, Inc. 0
CA Northern CA Indian Development Council, Inc. TBD
CA Southern CA Indian Center, Inc. 0
CA Tule River Tribal Council 8,050
CA United Indian Nations, Inc. 0
CA Ya-Ka-Ama Indian Education & Development 0
CO Denver Indian Center 0
CO Southern Ute Indian Tribe 10,732
CO Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe 22,806
FL Florida Governor's Council on Indian Affairs 0
FL Miccosukee Corporation 5,634
HI Alu Like, Inc. 1,875,434
ID Nez Perce Tribe 477 15,561
ID Shoshone-Bannock Tribes 477 57,685
IN American Indian Center of Indiana, Inc. 0
KS United Tribes of Kansas and S.E. Nebraska 10,464
LA Inter-Tribal Council of Louisiana, Inc. 4,025
ME Penobscot Nation 25,221
MA Mashpee-Wampahoag Indian Tribal Council, Inc. 0
MA North American Indian Center of Boston, Inc. 0
`Estimates For Planning Purposes Only ATTACHMENT D
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Supplemental Youth Services for Native Americans
PY 2010 Allotments
Total $13,861,035
Grant Award
State Grantee Name Type Amount
MI Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians 477 0
MI Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan, Inc. 29,513
MI MI Indian Employment and Training Services, I 0
MI North American Indian Association of Detroit 0
MI Potawatomi Indian Nation 0
MI Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians 19,586
MI Southeastern Michigan Indians. Inc. 0
MN American Indian OIC 0
MN Bois Forte R.B.C. 9,123
MN Fond Du Lac R.B.C. TBD
MN Leech Lake R.B.C. 53,392
MN Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians 477 23,879
MN Minneapolis American Indian Center 0
MN Red Lake Tribal Council 477 84,515
MN White Earth R.B.C. 477 55,002
MS Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians 68,149
MO American Indian Council 9,390
MT Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes 477 138,176
MT B.C. of the Chippewa Cree Tribe 38,904
MT Blackfeet Tribal Business Council 477 127,443
MT Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes 477 139,518
MT Crow Indian Tribe 88,272
MT Fort Belknap Indian Community 477 50,977
MT Montana United Indian Association 0
MT Northern Cheyenne Tribe 99,272
NE Indian Center, Inc. 0
NE Omaha Tribe of Nebraska 46,953
`Estimates For Planning Purposes Only ATTACHMENT D
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Supplemental Youth Services for Native Americans
PY 2010 Allotments
Total $13,861,035
Grant Award
State Grantee Name Type Amount
NE Winnebago Tribe 477 21,464
NV Inter-Tribal Council of Nevada TBD
NV Las Vegas Indian Center, Inc. 0
NV Reno Sparks Indian Colony 477 9,390
NV Shoshone-Paiute Tribes 477 14,757
NM Alamo Navajo School Board 49,636
NM Eight Northern Indian Pueblo Council 13,952
NM Five Sandoval Indian Pueblos, Inc. 93,638
NM Jicarilla Apache Tribe 28,171
NM Mescalero Apache Tribe 61,709
NM National Indian Youth Council 0
NM Ohkay Owingeh 477 13,415
NM Pueblo of Acoma 30,855
NM Pueblo of Isleta 11,805
NM Pueblo of Laguna 477 37,563
NM Pueblo of Taos 477 18,781
NM Pueblo of Zuni 477 130,126
NM Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. 30,855
NM Santa Clara Indian Pueblo 13,415
NM Santo Domingo Tribe 45,611
NY American Indian Community House, Inc. 9,123
NY Native Am. Comm. Services of Erie & Niagara Co 0
NY Native American Cultural Center, Inc. 3,219
NY Seneca Nation of Indians 477 32,196
NY St. Regis Mohawk Tribe 22,806
NC Cumberland County Association for Indian People 0
NC Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians 57,685
`Estimates For Planning Purposes Only ATTACHMENT D
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Supplemental Youth Services for Native Americans
PY 2010 Allotments
Total $13,861,035
Grant Award
State Grantee Name Type Amount
NC Guilford Native American Association 0
NC Haliwa-Saponi Tribe, Inc. 0
NC Lumbee Regional Development Association 0
NC Metrolina Native American Association 0
NC North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs 0
ND Spirit Lake Sioux Tribe 477 75,125
ND Standing Rock Sioux Tribe 124,761
ND Three Affiliated Tribes - Ft. Berthold Reservation 477 56,344
ND Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians 128,785
ND United Tribes Technical College 0
OH North America Indian Cultural Centers 0
OK Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 13,146
OK Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma 477 677,732
OK Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes 104,638
OK Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma 477 203,641
OK Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma 477 292,450
OK Citizen Band Potawatomi Indians of Oklahoma 477 219,740
OK Comanche Tribe of Oklahoma 72,442
OK Creek Nation of Oklahoma 477 356,842
OK Four Tribes Consortium of Oklahoma 68,149
OK Inter-Tribal Council of N.E. Oklahoma 27,098
OK Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma 90,418
OK Osage Tribal Council 477 52,319
OK OTOE-Missouria Tribe of Oklahoma 16,903
OK Pawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 477 14,757
OK Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma 56,075
OK Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 72,442
`Estimates For Planning Purposes Only ATTACHMENT D
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Supplemental Youth Services for Native Americans
PY 2010 Allotments
Total $13,861,035
Grant Award
State Grantee Name Type Amount
OK Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma 28,171
OK United Urban Indian Council, Inc. 199,885
OK Wyandotte Tribe of Oklahoma 0
OR Confed. Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon 477 1,073
OR Confed. Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Res 477 14,757
OR Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs 41,587
OR Organization of Forgotten Americans 6,171
PA Council of Three Rivers 0
RI Rhode Island Indian Council 0
SC South Carolina Indian Development Council, Inc. 2,683
SD Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe 477 142,201
SD Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 20,123
SD Oglala Sioux Tribe 417,210
SD Rosebud Sioux Tribe 477 245,496
SD Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe 477 59,026
SD United Sioux Tribe Development Corp. 13,415
SD Yankton Sioux Tribe 53,661
TX Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribal Council 1,073
TX Dallas Inter-Tribal Center 0
TX Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 17,440
UT Indian Training & Education Center 5,902
UT Ute Indian Tribe 60,368
VT Abenaki Self-Help Association/ NH Ind. Counc. 0
VA Mattaponi Pamunkey Monacan Consortium 0
WA American Indian Community Center TBD
WA Colville Confederated Tribes 477 49,636
WA Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Nation TBD
`Estimates For Planning Purposes Only ATTACHMENT D
U. S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Supplemental Youth Services for Native Americans
PY 2010 Allotments
Total $13,861,035
Grant Award
State Grantee Name Type Amount
WA Makah Tribal Council 477 13,415
WA Puyallup Tribe of Indians 14,488
WA Seattle Indian Center 0
WA Spokane Reservation 477 24,148
WA The Tulalip Tribes 477 21,464
WA Western WA Indian Empl. and Trng Pgm. 105,443
WI Ho-Chunk Nation 477 4,829
WI Lac Courte Oreilles Tribal Governing Board TBD
WI Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 12,073
WI Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin 477 49,636
WI Oneida Tribe of Indians of WI, Inc. 16,098
WI Spotted Eagle, Inc. 0
WI Stockbridge-Munsee Community 477 3,756
WI Wisconsin Indian Consortium 26,562
WY Eastern Shoshone Tribe 477 35,952
WY Northern Arapaho Business Council 80,759
Attachment 5 (official PDF): https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2010/TEGL29-09a5.pdf
Estimates for Planning Purposes Only ATTACHMENT E
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Comprehensive Services for Native Americans
PY 2010 Allotments
Appropriation Total 52,758,000
TAT (527,580)
Grantee Total $52,230,420
Grant Award
State Grantee Name Type Amount
AL Inter-Tribal Council of Alabama 277,190
AL Poarch Band of Creek Indians 88,865
AK Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Association 477 26,928
AK Association of Village Council Presidents 477 386,373
AK Bristol Bay Native Association 477 111,316
AK Central Council of Tlingit and Haida 477 181,928
AK Chugachmiut 477 26,237
AK Cook Inlet Tribal Council 477 416,590
AK Copper River Native Association 477 17,627
AK Kawerak Incorporated 477 144,916
AK Kenaitze Indian Tribe 41,637
AK Kodiak Area Native Association 477 27,362
AK Maniilaq Association Inc. 477 108,540
AK Metlakatla Indian Community 477 17,554
AK Orutsararmuit Native Council 477 49,720
AK Tanana Chiefs Conference, Inc. 477 272,815
AZ American Indian Association of Tucson 325,398
AZ Colorado River Indian Tribes 59,581
AZ Gila River Indian Community 491,148
AZ Hopi Tribal Council 209,160
AZ Hualapai Tribe 31,340
AZ Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. 76,735
AZ Native Americans for Community Action 190,197
AZ Navajo Nation 5,866,074
AZ Pasqua Yaqui Tribe 96,703
AZ Phoenix Indian Center, Inc. 1,182,685
AZ Quechan Indian Tribe 32,332
AZ Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Council 81,466
AZ San Carlos Apache Tribe 370,912
Page 1 of 7
Estimates for Planning Purposes Only ATTACHMENT E
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Comprehensive Services for Native Americans
PY 2010 Allotments
Appropriation Total 52,758,000
TAT (527,580)
Grantee Total $52,230,420
Grant Award
State Grantee Name Type Amount
AZ Tohono O'Odham Nation 477 356,687
AZ White Mountain Apache Tribe 436,921
AR American Indian Center of Arkansas, Inc. TBD
CA California Indian Manpower Consortium, Inc. TBD
CA Candelaria American Indian Council 308,677
CA Indian Human Resources Center, Inc. TBD
CA Northern CA Indian Development Council, Inc. TBD
CA Southern CA Indian Center, Inc. 1,580,742
CA Tule River Tribal Council 117,970
CA United Indian Nations, Inc. TBD
CA Ya-Ka-Ama Indian Education & Development TBD
CO Denver Indian Center 598,091
CO Southern Ute Indian Tribe 36,038
CO Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe 83,054
FL Florida Governor's Council on Indian Affairs 1,098,961
FL Miccosukee Corporation 114,430
HI Alu Like, Inc. 1,266,654
ID Nez Perce Tribe 477 65,991
ID Shoshone-Bannock Tribes 477 171,425
IN American Indian Center of Indiana, Inc. 226,289
KS United Tribes of Kansas and S.E. Nebraska 191,961
LA Inter-Tribal Council of Louisiana, Inc. 465,403
ME Penobscot Nation 180,349
MA Mashpee-Wampahoag Indian Tribal Council, Inc. 55,496
MA North American Indian Center of Boston, Inc. 200,916
MI Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians 477 29,656
MI Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan, Inc. 64,599
MI MI Indian Employment and Training Services, I 441,645
MI North American Indian Association of Detroit 131,715
Page 2 of 7
Estimates for Planning Purposes Only ATTACHMENT E
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Comprehensive Services for Native Americans
PY 2010 Allotments
Appropriation Total 52,758,000
TAT (527,580)
Grantee Total $52,230,420
Grant Award
State Grantee Name Type Amount
MI Potawatomi Indian Nation 57,364
MI Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians 157,849
MI Southeastern Michigan Indians. Inc. 70,470
MN American Indian OIC 246,186
MN Bois Forte R.B.C. 18,822
MN Fond Du Lac R.B.C. TBD
MN Leech Lake R.B.C. 141,644
MN Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians 477 50,990
MN Minneapolis American Indian Center 326,775
MN Red Lake Tribal Council 477 205,262
MN White Earth R.B.C. 477 111,452
MS Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians 277,614
MO American Indian Council 682,504
MT Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes 477 252,600
MT B.C. of the Chippewa Cree Tribe 130,561
MT Blackfeet Tribal Business Council 477 265,919
MT Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes 477 261,358
MT Crow Indian Tribe 152,184
MT Fort Belknap Indian Community 477 112,879
MT Montana United Indian Association 317,280
MT Northern Cheyenne Tribe 197,817
NE Indian Center, Inc. 261,692
NE Omaha Tribe of Nebraska 73,297
NE Winnebago Tribe 477 41,413
NV Inter-Tribal Council of Nevada TBD
NV Las Vegas Indian Center, Inc. 176,700
NV Reno Sparks Indian Colony 477 15,716
NV Shoshone-Paiute Tribes 477 112,911
NM Alamo Navajo School Board 82,440
Page 3 of 7
Estimates for Planning Purposes Only ATTACHMENT E
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Comprehensive Services for Native Americans
PY 2010 Allotments
Appropriation Total 52,758,000
TAT (527,580)
Grantee Total $52,230,420
Grant Award
State Grantee Name Type Amount
NM Eight Northern Indian Pueblo Council 37,862
NM Five Sandoval Indian Pueblos, Inc. 141,700
NM Jicarilla Apache Tribe 57,128
NM Mescalero Apache Tribe 81,079
NM National Indian Youth Council 1,480,573
NM Ohkay Owingeh 477 24,668
NM Pueblo of Acoma 125,954
NM Pueblo of Isleta 36,910
NM Pueblo of Laguna 477 80,675
NM Pueblo of Taos 477 37,663
NM Pueblo of Zuni 477 263,696
NM Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. 83,337
NM Santa Clara Indian Pueblo 30,010
NM Santo Domingo Tribe 92,659
NY American Indian Community House, Inc. 1,064,583
NY Native Am. Comm. Services of Erie & Niagara Co 147,302
NY Native American Cultural Center, Inc. 192,256
NY Seneca Nation of Indians 477 220,100
NY St. Regis Mohawk Tribe 128,653
NC Cumberland County Association for Indian People 60,136
NC Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians 152,994
NC Guilford Native American Association 72,480
NC Haliwa-Saponi Tribe, Inc. 56,467
NC Lumbee Regional Development Association 949,302
NC Metrolina Native American Association 108,405
NC North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs 275,085
ND Spirit Lake Sioux Tribe 477 144,464
ND Standing Rock Sioux Tribe 209,141
ND Three Affiliated Tribes - Ft. Berthold Reservation 477 174,680
Page 4 of 7
Estimates for Planning Purposes Only ATTACHMENT E
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Comprehensive Services for Native Americans
PY 2010 Allotments
Appropriation Total 52,758,000
TAT (527,580)
Grantee Total $52,230,420
Grant Award
State Grantee Name Type Amount
ND Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians 284,761
ND United Tribes Technical College 222,882
OH North America Indian Cultural Centers 488,419
OK Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 21,668
OK Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma 477 1,254,875
OK Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes 150,266
OK Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma 477 343,500
OK Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma 477 551,732
OK Citizen Band Potawatomi Indians of Oklahoma 477 308,057
OK Comanche Tribe of Oklahoma 146,748
OK Creek Nation of Oklahoma 477 690,089
OK Four Tribes Consortium of Oklahoma 92,655
OK Inter-Tribal Council of N.E. Oklahoma 71,135
OK Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma 122,021
OK Osage Tribal Council 477 93,119
OK OTOE-Missouria Tribe of Oklahoma 31,432
OK Pawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 477 29,942
OK Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma 78,487
OK Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 95,747
OK Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma 59,908
OK United Urban Indian Council, Inc. 349,543
OK Wyandotte Tribe of Oklahoma 104,567
OR Confed. Tribes of Siletz Indians of Orego 477 420,150
OR Confed. Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Res 477 26,212
OR Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs 122,984
OR Organization of Forgotten Americans 284,863
PA Council of Three Rivers 898,825
RI Rhode Island Indian Council 608,182
SC South Carolina Indian Development Council, Inc. 236,031
Page 5 of 7
Estimates for Planning Purposes Only ATTACHMENT E
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Comprehensive Services for Native Americans
PY 2010 Allotments
Appropriation Total 52,758,000
TAT (527,580)
Grantee Total $52,230,420
Grant Award
State Grantee Name Type Amount
SD Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe 477 215,629
SD Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 54,221
SD Oglala Sioux Tribe 638,927
SD Rosebud Sioux Tribe 477 470,403
SD Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe 477 119,992
SD United Sioux Tribe Development Corp. 544,699
SD Yankton Sioux Tribe 104,221
TX Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribal Council 846,909
TX Dallas Inter-Tribal Center 373,632
TX Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 627,062
UT Indian Training & Education Center 343,473
UT Ute Indian Tribe 114,220
VT Abenaki Self-Help Association/ NH Ind. Counc. 78,120
VA Mattaponi Pamunkey Monacan Consortium 242,655
WA American Indian Community Center TBD
WA Colville Confederated Tribes 477 176,550
WA Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Nation TBD
WA Makah Tribal Council 477 33,049
WA Puyallup Tribe of Indians 35,380
WA Seattle Indian Center TBD
WA Spokane Reservation 477 38,655
WA The Tulalip Tribes 477 42,820
WA Western WA Indian Empl. and Trng Pgm. 807,885
WI Ho-Chunk Nation 477 169,477
WI Lac Courte Oreilles Tribal Governing Board TBD
WI Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 40,769
WI Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin 477 95,159
WI Oneida Tribe of Indians of WI, Inc. 159,004
WI Spotted Eagle, Inc. 210,100
Page 6 of 7
Estimates for Planning Purposes Only ATTACHMENT E
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title I Sec. 166 Comprehensive Services for Native Americans
PY 2010 Allotments
Appropriation Total 52,758,000
TAT (527,580)
Grantee Total $52,230,420
Grant Award
State Grantee Name Type Amount
WI Stockbridge-Munsee Community 477 53,706
WI Wisconsin Indian Consortium 82,439
WY Eastern Shoshone Tribe 477 124,965
WY Northern Arapaho Business Council 212,482
Page 7 of 7
What does federal law require today?
This guidance has been withdrawn. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace