Back to Federal guidance
Native American program plans for 2008-09
Summary ETA instructed WIA section 166 Indian and Native American grantees to prepare two-year comprehensive services and supplemental youth plans for program years 2008 and 2009. ETA now labels this period-specific advisory Canceled.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
TEGL No. 25-07
Date issued
April 28, 2008
Status
Withdrawn
ETA lists this advisory Canceled as of 2026-10-24; its official letter prints Rescissions: None and Expiration Date: Continuing.
Status last verified October 24, 2026
Is this still the rule?
This document has been withdrawn. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
Accessible letter PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2008/TEGL25-07acc.pdf
CLASSIFICATION
WIA/Planning/Section
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION 166
ADVISORY SYSTEM CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OWI/INAP
DATE
Washington, D.C. 20210
April 28, 2008
ADVISORY: TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO. 25-07
TO: ALL SECTION 166 INDIAN AND NATIVE AMERICAN
GRANTEES
FROM: BRENT R. ORRELL /s/
Acting Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT: Planning Guidance and Instructions for Submission of a Two-Year
Strategic Plan for the Indian and Native American (INA), Section 166
program for Program Years (PY) 2008–2009; applying the Native
American Talent and Economic Development (NATED) framework.
1. Purpose. To provide planning guidelines and instructions to Native American
grantees for the development of a strategic two-year Comprehensive Services
Program (CSP) plan and Supplemental Youth Services Program (SYSP) plan for PY
2008-2009. Native American entities designated as a Section 166 grantee for PY
2008-2009 must submit a two-year plan for meeting the employment and training
needs of Indians, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians consistent with the purposes
described in Section 166 of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA).
The requirement to submit a two-year strategic plan is contingent upon your
organization being “Designated” as a Section 166 grantee for PY 2008-2009. Grantees
that are not designated as a Section 166 grantee for PY 2008-2009 will not receive
Section 166 funds and therefore, there is no need for them to submit a two-year plan.
Grant designations will be made in accordance with the procedures described in the
Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA) process which was published in the Federal
Register on January 4, 2008 (73 Federal Re. 883).
As indicated in No. 4 below, the Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
expects the initial submission of the two-year plan to thoroughly address the guiding
questions in Attachment B. Plans that fail to meet these standards will not be
approved. Therefore, grantees are encouraged to begin working on their two-year
strategic plan as soon as they receive this TEGL.
RESCISSIONS: EXPIRATION DATE:
None Continuing
2. References.
a. Section 166 of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA)
http://www.doleta.gov/dinap/cfml/wiapage.cfm
b. Regulations implementing the WIA Section 166 Indian and Native American
Program
c. TEGL 17-05, Common Measures Policy for the Employment and Training
Administration’s (ETA) Performance Accountability System and Related
Performance Issues located at:
http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=2195
d. TEGL 3-04, ETA's New Strategic Vision for the Delivery of Youth Services Under the
Workforce Investment Act located at:
http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=1589
e. TEGL 28-05, The Employment and Training Administration’s (ETA’s) New Strategic
Vision for the Delivery of Youth Services Under the Workforce Investment Act (WIA):
“Expanding ETA’s Vision for the Delivery of Youth Services under WIA to include
Indian and Native American Youth and Youth with Disabilities” located at:
http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=2224
f. TEGL 3-06, Application Instructions for Program Year (PY) 2006 Workforce
Information Core Products and Services Grants: Workforce Information Formula
Allocations to States located at:
http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=2254
g. DINAP Bulletin No. 99-05 Administrative Costs Limitations under the WIA
located at: http://www.doleta.gov/dinap/bulletins/99-05.cfm
h. TEGL 13-07, Use of Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Funds for Workforce
Development Activities in Support of Economic Development located at:
http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=2560
i. TEGL 13-06 and TEGL 13-06 Change 1, Instructions for Workforce Investment Act
and Wagner-Peyser Act State Planning and Waiver Requests for Years Three and
Four of the Strategic Five-Year State Plan (Program Years 2007 and 2008) located
at: http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=2298,
http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=2327
3. Background. As stated in the enabling legislation, the purpose of the Section 166
program includes promoting “the economic and social development of Indian, Alaska
Native, and Native Hawaiian communities in accordance with the goals and values of
such communities” (WIA Section 166 (a)(1)(C). ETA believes that the objectives of the
Section 166 program are in agreement with the Workforce Innovation in Regional
Economic Development (WIRED) Initiative, which emphasizes the role of talent
development in driving regional economic competitiveness, increased job growth,
and new opportunities for all workers.
2
WIRED integrates workforce investment, education, and economic development
systems in support of regional economic competitiveness, and is based on the premise
that talent development can drive economic transformation in regional economies. In
recognition of the fact that many innovative regional economic development
initiatives and partnerships already exist throughout Indian Country, ETA, with this
planning guidance, is starting a process of adapting WIRED for INA grantees as the
Native American Talent and Economic Development (NATED) framework.
Integrating the NATED framework into the two-year plans will allow INA grantees to
express how they plan to connect their programs to talent development strategies in
support of regional economic development efforts including:
• integrating Section 166 activities into broader regional economic and talent
development strategies in order to increase the employment and career
potential for the Native Americans served by the program;
• tailoring training opportunities to the realities of the local economy in order to
facilitate job placement and career advancement; and
• ensuring that economic development projects occurring in their communities
provide job opportunities to the local INA labor force.
Therefore, as part of the two-year Comprehensive Service Plan (CSP) for PY 2008-
2009, ETA seeks to integrate the principles of NATED into the Section 166 program.
Item No. 6 of this TEGL explains the principles of NATED, and Attachment B
provides guiding questions on how to address the key components of the NATED
initiative in the two-year plan narrative. Grantees will have access to training and
examples of promising practices to help them guide their planning.
4. Quality of Plans and the Approval Process. In an effort to revitalize and improve the
two-year strategic planning process, significant changes have been made to the
planning requirements for this period. ETA will require that two-year plans for PY
2008-2009 provide a strategy for meeting the employment and training needs of
Indian and Native Americans in accordance with the framework and principles of the
NATED framework. In the past, grantees could meet the planning requirements by
providing updates to their previous two-year plan. However, this two-year plan will
be significantly different and grantees are expected to submit new plans. ETA is also
requiring that this two-year plan address in greater detail the services that will be
provided to Native Americans and projected outcomes.
For the PY 2008 – 2009 Comprehensive Service Program (CSP) plan, grantees are
expected to include the number and types of participants served, as well as the
3
kinds of services that will be made available. The plan should discuss current and
projected labor market demand in their services areas, and identify strategies that will
be implemented to meet those changing needs. Moreover, the grantee
operating the CSP must address program planning and service delivery approaches,
and state how the program intends to collaborate and partner with other
organizations to leverage and share limited resources. The CSP grant recipients
should demonstrate what “good faith efforts” have been made with Local Boards in
establishing Memorandum of Agreements. The plan should also include any barriers
the grantee has experienced in attempting to incorporate the One-Stop Career System
approach. (Attachment B).
The PY 2008-2009, Supplemental Youth Service Program (SYSP) plans are only
required for grantees receiving these funds. Since some of the items cited in the CSP
narrative apply to both the CSP and SYSP, grantees need only address the items
indicated below, along with the youth goals and calculation worksheet in Attachment
E. In PY 2009, grantees will be required to implement the youth common measures,
and the SYSP design will need to be modified prior to April 1, 2009.
The SYSP plan should indicate the number of youth to be served, and specifically
identify strategies for recruiting and retaining most-in-need and/or at-risk-youth.
The SYSP plan must address what services and training are being offered to prepare
individuals who are entering the labor market. Plans to reduce dropout rates and
improve access to post-secondary education should also be included in the SYSP plan.
Grantees are encouraged to identify alternative learning opportunities in the SYSP
plan that prepare youth for post-secondary education. Youth activities that promote
cultural identity should be included in the SYSP plan. The plan should demonstrate
how the program intends to partner with educational providers to academically
prepare students to successfully move into post-secondary education.
Plans that do not fully address the guiding questions in Attachment B or are
otherwise incomplete will not be approved. Grantees will be given the opportunity to
amend their plan after the initial submission; however, such amendments must be
submitted within 15 days from the date the grantee was notified by the Federal
Project Officer that the plan will require amendments in order to be approved.
Grantees that have been given an opportunity to amend their plan, and the plan still
does not meet the requirements of this TEGL will be determined to have “failed” to
4
submit a two-year plan. Grantees that fail to submit a two-year plan may be subject
to sanctions including the possible defunding and reassignment of the service areas.
5. Unspent Funds from Prior Program Years. In PY 2006, the Native American program had
a total of $55,435,007 in WIA funds available for expenditure. This included $43,427,182
from the PY 2006 funding appropriation (excluding PL. 102-477 grantees) and
$12,007,825 from unexpended funds from prior program years. Of this amount, the
total expenditures at the end of PY 2006 were $41,546,622 leaving $13,888,385 in
unexpended funds at the end of the program year (June 30, 2007). Given the
employment and training needs among Native Americans, we expect unspent funds
to be minimal at the end of the program year. WIA regulations at 20 CFR §668.296(d)
allow for funds to be reallocated from one INA grantee to another if a grantee has
unspent funds in excess of 20 percent of the total funds available at the end of a
program year. At the end of PY 2007 (June 30, 2008), ETA will recapture funds from
grantees that have carry-over funds in excess of the 20 percent limit and re-distribute
the funds to grantees that were under the 20 percent carry-over limit.
In order to maximize expenditures, grantees should factor in their new PY 2008
funding and any unspent carry-over funds from prior program years. In addition,
grantees should plan their budgets to provide quality employment and training
services to the maximum number of participants.
6. Guiding Principles of the Two Year Strategic Plan. For this two-year strategic plan,
grantees must incorporate the principles of NATED in the narrative section of the
plan. These principles support the integration of Section 166 programs into regional
economic and talent development strategies. Grantees must demonstrate how their
program intends to:
• build a demand-driven talent development system that incorporates regional
economic development needs and strengths;
• align regional economic and workforce development efforts, including Section
166 program activities;
• enhance an integrated service delivery system that focuses on services rather
than programs;
• advance a vision for serving youth most in need (for grantees operating youth
programs);
5
• utilize workforce information and economic data as the foundation for
strategic planning and career guidance;
• strengthen partnerships with community- and faith-based organizations;
• utilize an integrated and enhanced performance accountability system.
Each of these principles is described in more detail below.
A. Demand-Driven Talent Development System that Incorporates Regional
Economic Development Needs and Strengths.
INA grantees have an opportunity to provide their customers with enhanced
education and career opportunities as well as to advance regional economic
competitiveness by preparing individuals for the jobs in regional economically
vital industry sectors. INA grantees must work in partnership with tribal
economic development entities, the workforce investment system, the One-Stop
Career Center System, business and industry, educators, economic development
agencies and other strategic partners in order to: 1) fully understand the available
education and career opportunities, 2) most effectively leverage other resources,
3) shape new strategies to ensure Native Americans are considered a valuable
labor pool, and 4) overcome their challenges to both education and employment.
In so doing, INA grantees will accomplish two important goals. First, INA
workers will be trained and placed in industries with career advancement
potential. Second, grantees can contribute to local economic growth by supplying
critical labor resources to local economic development initiatives, especially those
in the start-up phase. As appropriate, INA grantees should:
a) collaborate with regional strategic partners as part of a talent development
system, and not just as a job-training provider,
b) align post-secondary education for lifelong learning opportunities with the
region’s talent development strategy,
c) partner with tribal economic development entities, workforce investment
system partners, educators, and regional economic development agencies
to provide integrated services rather than operating a siloed system,
d) align workforce development activities with economic development
initiatives in the region,
6
e) maintain flexibility in order to take advantage of entrepreneurial and small
business opportunities, and
f) work with education, employer, and economic development partners to
gather and analyze a wide array of current and real-time workforce and
economic data in order to develop economically-relevant strategies,
routinely track economic conditions, measure outcomes, and evaluate local
economic competitiveness,
B. Implement Innovative Workforce Education and Preparation Strategies To
Maximize Career Opportunities in High Growth, High Demand Industries and
Promote Life-Long Learning.
As INA grantees shift from job training to talent development, education
strategies should focus not only on initial job placement but also on career and
educational advancement. Working with education providers to develop the
following strategies can help:
a) grantees receiving youth funding: designing K-12 and alternative education
curricula to academically prepare students to successfully move into post-
secondary education and to succeed in the workplace. Grantees are
encouraged to identify a variety of alternative learning opportunities
(multiple education pathways) that prepare youth for post-secondary
education.
b) offer more entry and exit points in adult learning initiatives in recognition
of the fact that students need to earn and learn simultaneously, and may
need to approach both their education and career progression
incrementally. This is particularly essential for incumbent workers who
need lifelong education to remain in economically self-sustaining jobs.
c) developing new education models to support cross-disciplinary learning to
meet the expanding range of competencies and skill sets that are needed on
the job.
d) using Registered Apprenticeship as an important talent development
strategy and a critical post-secondary education and training opportunity.
7
C. Enhancing an Integrated Service Delivery System that Focuses on Services
Rather than Programs.
INA grantees that conduct field operations or provide substantial services are
required partners of the One-Stop Career Center delivery systems and should seek
to leverage other resources through collaboration with strategic partners and
opportunities to enhance service delivery through integration. Rather than
operating as a siloed service-delivery system, INAP grantees should “in-good
faith” negotiate a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Local Boards
regarding the workforce investment system; thus facilitating a seamless system
organized around service delivery rather than as separate programs. INAP
grantees that do not provide substantial services are encouraged to participate in
the One-Stop Career Center Delivery System. Customers should be viewed as
consumers of the workforce system rather than of a specific program.
The planning process offers a vehicle for grantees to identify strategies for
integration within the broader workforce system and to identify collaborative
strategies to enhance service delivery for INAP participants. One mechanism for
integrating service delivery is through the MOU with state and/or local workforce
investment boards. Consolidation and coordination of employment and training
programs is one of the fundamental purposes of the Workforce Investment Act.
Accordingly, this two-year strategic plan requires grantees to submit a copy of
their MOU, which has been negotiated with the state or Local WIB. Grantees that
have not entered into a MOU with their state or local WIB must provide
documentation that they have made a good-faith effort to negotiate an MOU with
the state or local WIB.
D. Advancing a Vision for Serving Youth Most in Need.
Children living in an American Indian Area (AIA) are more likely to live in
poverty than those living outside. In 1999, 38 percent of children living in AIAs
were living in poverty, compared to 27 percent of those living outside AIAs. 1 As
of 2003, close to 23 percent of American Indians and Alaska Natives ages 25 and
over had not completed high school compared to 15.4 percent of the general
population. 2 The workforce development system needs to address this problem
by serving youth most in need, particularly Native American youth, children of
incarcerated parents, and youth with disabilities to help them achieve literacy and
numeracy gains, attain a high school diploma, and transition to post-secondary
1
U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 4.
2
U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, Current Population Survey (CPS), March 2003.
8
education and career pathways. In an attempt to address this problem, the U.S.
Department of Labor has developed a Youth Vision (described in TEGLs 3-04 and
28-05 and available on www.doleta.gov), which proposes that the public
workforce system serve the neediest youth: youth aging out of foster care, those
involved with the juvenile justice system, children of incarcerated parents,
migrant youth, Native American youth and youth with disabilities.
INA grantees receiving youth funds, where possible, should work with other
workforce investment system partners, such as the education community,
employers, and community organizations, to align resources in order to remove
barriers and increase access to post-secondary education. This may include
conducting planning sessions with providers to identify existing resources and
gaps in services in the community and developing strategies to jointly address
these gaps. WIA Section 166 supports the development of academically rigorous
education pathways that help youth achieve the competencies necessary for
today’s climate while acknowledging their different learning styles and
constraints.
E. Utilizing Workforce Information as the Foundation for Strategic Planning and
Career Guidance.
To effectively develop and implement workforce development strategies in the
current economy requires a strong understanding of regional economic
conditions. Without accurate data about employment prospects, economic
development projects on the horizon and education opportunities, the workforce
development system and INA grantees will not be able to train and place
participants in jobs with strong career pathways that promote lifelong learning.
Ideas for expanded data sources and categories of data that can be sought and
used to create new knowledge about regional economies were set forth in TEGL
3-06, available at http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=2254
F. Strengthening Partnerships with Faith-Based and Community Organizations.
The U.S. Department of Labor encourages INAP grantees to build and strengthen
partnerships with community-and faith-based organizations. In many instances,
these organizations are already managing and implementing programs and
services that target the population served through WIA, such as job readiness and
life skills training or services for populations most in need. Through
collaboration, resources can be leveraged to provide a higher quality and more
efficient workforce investment system.
9
G. Enhancing Performance Outcomes.
Performance accountability systems provide a link between services, outcomes,
and results achieved. The recently implemented common measures are one
critical component of DOL’s efforts to facilitate this process. These measures
describe in a similar manner the core purposes of all programs operated by the
workforce investment system – did people find jobs, did people stay employed,
and did their earnings increase. INA grantees are tracking performance outcomes
using the Management Information System (MIS) Bear Tracks and are reporting
regularly to INAP about program outcomes. As part of this planning process,
grantees must complete the worksheet in Attachment C, which will provide ETA
with the projected enrollment and outcome goals for the planning period.
7. Common Measures (CSP ONLY). Section 166 grantees began using the common
measures performance system in PY 2006 for the CSP (Adult) program only. As
stated in previous guidance, baseline data must be collected and evaluated before
performance levels can be established for the three common measures, (e.g.) Entered
Employment Rate, Retention Rate and Average Earnings). PY 2006 was the first full
year to collect performance data on the common measures, and due to the time lag in
receiving performance outcomes for the Retention Rate and Average Earnings, ETA
does not have sufficient base line data in order to establish individual grantee
performance levels for these two measures. However, the INA program has always
had an Entered Employment Rate similar to the Common Measures Entered
Employment Rate. Therefore, a minimum and recommended level of performance
for the Entered Employment Rate has been established for each INA grantee based on
the economic conditions in the grantee’s service area and the socio-economic
characteristics of the participants served in the previous program year. Attachment F
provides the minimum and recommended levels of performance for your
organization. The SYSP will continue to use the existing 13 participant goals and
attainments for PY 2008. ETA anticipates implementing youth common measures
beginning in PY 2009. In addition to the common measures, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) tracks program efficiency for many government
programs including the Section 166 program as part of the Government Performance
Results Act (GPRA). The GPRA measure determines the efficiency of a program by
determining the number of people the program serves given the amount of money
the program receives.
ETA has established an efficiency rate (also known as an Average Cost per Customer)
for the Section 166 INA program of $2,300. This rate includes enrolled participants
10
and self-service customers. In order to meet this goal, the Section 166 program must
serve a total of 18,834 customers in PY 2008. This is calculated by dividing the
amount of funding the program receives ( 3 $43,318,672) by the efficiency rate ($2,300)
(i.e. $43,318,672 divided by $2,300 = 18,834). In addition, ETA has established a
secondary efficiency rate for enrolled participants ONLY (i.e. without self-service
participants) of $3,500.
Since each individual grantee contributes to the efficiency rate based on the total
number of customers served in the Section 166 program, it is important that each
grantee serve a certain number of customers given the amount of funding it receives
in order for the overall Section 166 program to meet its efficiency goal. While many
grantees have an efficiency/average cost per customer rate below $2,300, some
grantees far exceed this level. Therefore, as part of this two-year strategic plan, a
worksheet has been attached (see Attachment C) to assist grantees in determining
their efficiency rate. Section II.3 (column C) of the worksheet provides the estimated
efficiency rate without self service customers. Section IV.5 (column C) provides the
estimated efficiency rate using program participants and self-service customers.
Grantees are not dissuaded from submitting efficiency costs greater than the amounts
indicated above. ETA recognizes that a high efficiency rate is not necessarily an
indicator that a grantee is inefficient. For example, grantees may invest more money
and resources into training participants in high quality/high cost training programs
that produce better performance outcomes. Exceeding the above mentioned cost per
customer rates does not put a grantee at risk of being sanctioned. However, based on
the information provided in the worksheet, ETA may require grantees to submit
additional financial information if the efficiency rate in Section II.3 is greater than
$3,500 or the efficiency rate in Section IV.5 is greater than $2,300.
8. Period of Performance. This two-year plan covers the program year April 1, 2008 –
March 31, 2010, for the SYSP and July 1, 2008 - June 30, 2010, for the CSP. The grant
funds provided in PY 2006 and PY 2007 can be expended during this two-year cycle,
3
The total funding allocation in PY 2008 for the Section 166 program is $52,757,931. However, only funds actually
received by Section 166 grantees are considered in calculating the efficiency measure. Therefore, the figure above
excludes $527,579 that is reserved for TAT and $8,911,680 that is transferred to the Department of Interior as part of
Public Law 102-477 Demonstration Act.
11
except that PY 2006 funds will not be available for expenditure in PY 2009 since all
grant funds have a 3-year expiration date. SYSP funds may not be available in
grantee sub accounts at the beginning of the PY (April 1st), however, grantees may use
“carry-over” funds from previous PYs (if available) to implement the SYSP.
Grantees that do not have carry-over funds from previous PYs may use other (non-
restricted) resources to begin operating a SYSP and reimburse the program for
allowable costs retroactive to April 1, when funds become available in grantee sub
accounts. However, grantees should be aware that a formal commitment or
obligation of DOL funds will only occur when a Notice of Obligation has been issued
by the Grant Officer and the subsequent two-year plan has been approved. Grantees
that have not received an official “designation” letter from the Grant Officer re-
designating their organization as a Section 166 grantee, or that have been
“conditionally” designated, have a greater risk of not being reimbursed for funds that
have been advanced to their WIA program.
9. Administrative Cost Limit. DINAP Bulletin 99-05 (dated December 10, 1999),
provides ETA’s policy on administrative cost limits for each Section 166 program.
The policy sets a limit of 15 percent (of the funding year allocation) for administrative
costs, with an exception that ETA may approve a higher administrative limit, not to
exceed 20 percent, if a grantee can provide acceptable justification for a higher limit.
Grantees requesting a rate higher than 15 percent for this two-year plan must include
a detailed administrative budget and narrative justification with the two-year plan.
The budget should include items such as indirect costs, staff salaries, fringe benefits,
rental space, utilities, equipment, supplies, travel, etc. The regulation at 20 CFR
667.220 defines what functions and activities constitute administrative costs subject to
the administrative cost limit.
10. Grievance Procedures, Complaints, and Appeals Processes. According to the
regulations at 20 CFR 667.600, grantees must provide a copy of their grievance
procedures to participants and other interested parties. A copy of the grantee’s
grievance procedure must be included as an attachment to this two-year plan. At a
minimum, the grievance procedure must include: 1) a process for addressing
grievances and complaints from participants and other applicable parties; 2) an
opportunity for a fair and impartial hearing to be completed by the grantee within 60
days of filing the grievance; and 3) an opportunity to file a grievance with the
Department of Labor’s, Indian and Native American Program when a decision is not
made within 60 days or either party is dissatisfied with the local hearing decision.
Violations under the provisions of WIA section 188 may be directed or mailed to the
Director, Civil Rights Center, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N4123,
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210.
12
11. Modification of an Approved Plan. Approved plans may be modified, upon Grant
Officer approval, when it is determined that the grantee’s current two-year strategy is
not meeting the workforce needs of the community or when shifts in the local labor
market and/or employer demands (such as job skills training) require a strategy that
is significantly different from the approved plan. Modifications are not necessary for
changes that do not significantly change the scope and purpose of the approved plan.
Grantees should contact their Federal Project Officer when planning to change the
scope, purpose or design of their grant to determine whether such changes are
significant enough to require prior Grant Officer approval.
12. Waivers. WIA Section 166(h)(3) permits waivers of any statutory or regulatory
requirement except for those areas cited in Section 668.920. DINAP Bulletin 95-29
provides specific instructions on how to request waivers to the regulations and other
program requirements. Grantees may submit a waiver request along with their two-
year plan; however, waiver approvals follow a separate process than two-year plan
approvals. Therefore, waiver requests should be included in the two-year plan as a
separate attachment. Grantees may also submit a request for a waiver at any time
during the two-year program period.
13. Acquisition of Equipment. Grant Officer approval is required prior to the
acquisition of equipment that has a useful life of more than one year and an
acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit pursuant to OMB Circulars A-102 [29 CFR
97.33] and A-110 [29 CFR 95.2 (n)]. Approval of equipment is a separate process and
cannot be included in the overall approval process of the two-year plan. Grantees
must submit requests for the purchase of equipment separately.
14. PY 2008 Funding Allocations. The PY 2008 appropriation levels for the Section 166
CSP is $52,757,931 and $13,861,042 for the SYSP. Attachments G and H of this TEGL
provide the funding allotments for individual grantees. The allotments provided in
this TEGL are for planning purposes only and are not an official commitment/
obligation by the Department. The allotments do not reflect any changes that may
occur as a result of the recent competition process. Grantees will receive an official
Notice of Obligation from the Grant Officer upon approval of the two-year plan.
15. Assurances and Certifications. Assurances and certifications will be required for this
plan. Attachment D provides the assurances and certifications that must be
submitted with this plan. Grantees should review the assurances and certifications to
be aware of the responsibilities and requirements in administering the Section 166
grant.
13
16. Action Required. The due date for submission of the two-year plan is 60 Days
from the date of this guidance. Grantees must submit three copies of the plan with
at least one plan having an original signature of an authorized official that matches
one of the names on the Grant Signature Sheet (Attachment A).
Grantees must submit the two-year plan postmarked no later than 60 Days from the
date of this guidance, to the address provided below. Please be aware that mail in
the Washington D.C. area continues to go through decontamination procedures.
Therefore, it is recommended that grantees use an overnight mail service in order to
expedite the delivery of the two-year plan. Grantees may also e-mail an electronic
version of their plan to [email protected]. Please note that e-mailed plans still
require grantees to submit an original signature sheet (Attachment A) in the mail or
overnight delivery to:
U.S. Department of Labor
Indian and Native American Programs
Office of Workforce Investment
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
FPB Room S-4206
Washington, D.C. 20210
ATTN: MIS-CSP_DESK
17. Inquiries. Please direct questions to your designated Federal Project Officer
provided below.
Evangeline M. Campbell, Program Manager (202) 693 – 3737
Andrea Brown (East) (202) 693-3736 Duane Hall (Midwest) (972) 850-4637
Craig Lewis (Midwest) (202) 693-3384 Guy Suetopka (West) (415) 625-7988
Dawn Anderson (Midwest) (202) 693-3745 Si Seciwa (West) (415) 625-7987
18. Attachments. The following attachments and required documents must be included.
Attachment A: Grant Signature Sheet
Attachment B: Two-Year planning narrative
Attachment C: Participant Planning, Efficiency and Outcomes Worksheet
Attachment D: Assurances and Certifications
Attachment E: SYSP Goals and Calculation Worksheet (SYSP funded
Grantees only)
Required Documents: Grantee Grievance Procedures
Indirect Cost Rate / Cost Allocation Plan (if applicable)
14
Attachments for Information Only: (Do Not Return with Plan)
Attachment F: CSP Performance Worksheet
Attachment G: SYS Allotments
Attachment H: CSP Allotments
15
Attachment PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2008/TEGL25-07aA.pdf
Attachment A
GRANT SIGNATURE SHEET
WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT SECTION 166
INDIAN AND NATIVE AMERICAN PROGRAMS
GRANT MODIFICATION
NUMBER (New Number will assigned by the Grant Officer) NUMBER _________1________
Grantee Name and Address:
Contact Phone No.:
This document: (check only one appropriate action)
A. X Submits a new Two Year Plan for the period 4/01/2008 to 6/30/2010 _
B. Modifies the current Two Year Plan to incorporate Program Year(s): _____ and
____
Briefly describe the purpose of the action and attach supporting documents and/or narrative as needed.
Implements a new two-year strategic plan for Program Years (PY) 2008 & 2009________
___________________________________________________________
Approved for the Grantee by:
Name:
Title:
Signature Date
Attachment PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2008/TEGL25-07aB.pdf
Attachment B
Two-Year Comprehensive Service Plan (CSP) Narrative
Grantees should consider Native American Talent and Economic Development (NATED)
principles and strategies as they answer the questions in the two-year strategic plan narrative.
Plans should thoroughly address the items in this attachment in order to be approved.
1. Participants. Describe the number of participants to be served. If the grantee has
established a priority system for serving eligible individuals due to limited resources or to
focus on a certain segment of the eligible Native American population, describe the priority
system.
2. Array of Services. Please describe the array of services the grantee intends to make
available to participants. Describe the training strategies that will be implemented in order to
prepare individuals for entering the labor market. Describe how strategies will increase the
number of participants gaining educational or industry recognized credentials.
3. Labor Market Demand. Describe the labor market demand in the grantee’s local and
regional areas. Please include any information you have about local and regional economic
development, industry strengths, as well as economic development projects on the horizon
(e.g., casino expansion, sewer development, farm expansions, housing development, hotel
development, fish hatcheries, etc.).
4. Local and Regional Economy. How will you prepare individuals to meet the demands of
the local and/or regional labor market? How will you take advantage of local and/or regional
economic development projects? How will you link with others to provide training to
prepare individuals for placement with employers or industries that are strong or are
growing? If you are planning to make available entrepreneurial training, describe how the
training is linked to other services and how it supports successful small business
development.
5. Employer Engagement. Please describe how you plan to engage employers (business and
industry, private and public, including tribal) in your program planning and program service
delivery strategies.
6. Partnering. Please list the agencies and organizations that you plan to partner with, how
you plan to leverage and share resources, and how you will engage in information sharing
with these partners in order to track participants, including the following:
a. K-12 and/or alternative schools, tribal, technical, and community colleges.
b. Economic development agencies, such as tribal departments of Human Resources and
Department of Economic and Business Development, local WIBs, Chambers of
Commerce, and local businesses.
c. Faith-based and community based organizations.
Attachment B (Continued)
7. Workforce System Relationships. Describe your current relationship with local, regional,
or statewide workforce development systems, including any Memoranda of Understanding
(MOU) with the local or statewide workforce investment board(s) (WIB) if any, as well as
relationships with One-Stops Career Centers (if applicable). If an MOU or a relationship
with the local One-Stop Career Center has not been established, provide a detailed
explanation and describe the actions or initiatives the grantee will take to address this issue.
Incumbent grantees should submit a list of local or statewide WIBs with whom MOUs have
been negotiated.
Supplemental Youth Services Plan (SYSP) Narrative
A SYSP plan narrative is only required for grantees receiving SYSP funding. Since some of the
items addressed in the CSP narrative apply to both the CSP and SYSP, grantees need only
address the items indicated below, along with the youth goals and calculation worksheet in
Attachment E. Note: In PY 2009, grantees will be implementing youth common measures and
the SYSP design may need to be modified prior to April 1, 2009.
1. Participants. Describe the number of youth to be served in the SYSP. Please address
strategies for recruiting and retaining most-in-need and/or at-risk-youth in your programs.
2. Array of Services. Please describe the array of services the grantee intends to make
available to participants. Describe the types of training that will be offered to prepare
individuals for entering the labor market. Describe strategies to reduce dropout rates and
improve access to post-secondary education. Grantees are encouraged to identify a variety of
alternative learning opportunities (Multiple Educational Pathways) that prepare youth for
post-secondary education.
3. Cultural Identity. Describe any efforts that encourage culturally relevant youth activities,
such as any interaction with educational providers that academically prepare students to
successfully move into post-secondary education and succeed in the workplace while
maintaining or promoting cultural identity.
4. Partnering. Describe how the SYSP program will partner with educational providers to
academically prepare students to successfully move into post-secondary education.
2
Attachment PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2008/TEGL25-07aC.pdf
COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES PROGRAM ATTACHMENT C
Grantee:
Section I: Total Funds Available
Section I. Total Funds Available Funding
1. PY 2008 Funding (See Attachment H)
2. Estimated carry-over from prior program years
3. Total Funds Available
Sections II, III, IV & V: Total Participants, Customers and Exiters
a. b. c.
Section II. Estimated Participants, Funding and Efficiency Participants Funding Efficiency
1. Number of New Participants Enrolled in the Program for PY 2008
2. Participants Carried Over from the Previous program year
3. Total Participants, Funding and Efficiency (w/out self service customers)
Section III. Estimated Self Service "Customers"
4. Number of Customers that Receive Self Services Only for PY 2008 0 0
Section IV. Efficiency - Participants and Self Service Customers
5. Total Participants, Funding and Efficiency (with self service customers)
Section V. Estimated Exiters
6. Number of participants in line II.3 above that will exit in PY 2008
Section VI: Activities and Costs
Section VI. Estimated Participants, Funding and Efficiency Participants Costs
1. CRT - Job Skills
2. CRT - Basic Education
3. Work Experience
4. On-the-Job Training
5. Supportive Services
6. Training Assistance
7. Administrative Costs
8. Total Participants and costs
Section VII: Common Measures Performance Outcomes
Section VII. a. b. c.
Numerator Numerator
Common Measures Entered Retention Average
Denominator Denominator
Projected Outcomes Emp. Rate Rate Earnings
Employed qtr. after exit
1. Entered Employment Rate
Exiters during PY 2008
nd rd
Emp. 2 and 3 qtr. after exit
2. Retention Rate
Exiters during PY 2008
nd rd
Earnings 2 and 3 qtr.
3. Average Earnings
Exiters during PY 2008
Attachment PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2008/TEGL25-07aD.pdf
Attachment D
WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT
INDIAN AND NATIVE AMERICAN PROGRAMS
ASSURANCES AND CERTIFICATIONS
FOR
PROGRAM YEARS 2008 and 2009
By signing the Agreement and on the line below, the Grantee’s signatory official agrees to the
certifications and assurances referenced herein, and as detailed in the attached documents.
(NOTE: Please complete and check document boxes as appropriate)
(GRANTEE)
(NAME OF SIGNATORY OFFICIAL)
(SIGNATURE) (DATE)
Attachment D (Continued)
ASSURANCES AND CERTIFICATIONS.
The Department of Labor will not award a grant or agreement where the grantee has failed to accept the
ASSURANCES AND CERTIFICATIONS contained in this section. In performing its responsibilities
under the Grant, the Grantee hereby certifies and assures that it will fully comply with the following:
Assurances - Non-Construction Programs (SF-424B)
Debarment and Suspension Certification (20 CFR Part 98)
Certification Regarding Lobbying (29 CFR Part 93)
Drug Free Workplace Certification (29 CFR Part 98)
Nondiscrimination & Equal Opportunity Assurance (29 CFR Part 37)
Certification of Non-Delinquency
By signing the face sheet of this Grant Agreement, the Grantee is providing the above assurances and
certifications as detailed below:
A. ASSURANCES - NON-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS. Some of these assurances may not be
applicable to your project or program. If you have questions, please contact the awarding agency.
As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I certify that the applicant:
1. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal Assistance, and the institutional managerial
and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project
costs) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in
this application.
2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, and if appropriate,
the State, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records,
books, papers, or documents related to the award; and will establish a proper accounting system
in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives.
3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that
constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or
personal gain.
4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of
the awarding agency.
5. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C.4728-4763)
relating to prescribed standards for merit systems for programs funded under one of the nineteen
statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of
Personnel Administration (5 CFR 900, Subpart F).
6. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not
limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits
2
Attachment D (Continued)
discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education
Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits
discrimination on the basis of handicaps; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29
U.S.C. §794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination
on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-255) as
amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (f) the Comprehensive
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-
616) as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g)
523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. 290 dd.3 and 290 ee-3), as
amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; (h) Title VIII of
the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 360l et seq.) as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in
the sale, rental or financing of housing; (i) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific
statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; and (j) the requirements
of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application.
7. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which
provides for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a
result of Federal or federally assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real
property acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in purchases.
8. Will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act (U.S.C. 1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit
the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or
in part with Federal funds.
9. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a to 276a
7), the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. 276c and 18 U.S.C. 874, and the Contract Work Hours and
Safety Standards Act (40.327-333), regarding labor standards for federally assisted construction
subagreements.
10. Will comply, if applicable, with Flood Insurance Purchase Requirements of Section 102(A) of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood
hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of
insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more.
11. Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following:
(a) institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating
facilities pursuant to EO 11738; (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) evaluation
of flood hazards in flood plains in accordance with EO 11988; (e) assurance of project
consistency with the approved State management program developed under the Coastal Zone
Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.); (f) conformity of Federal actions to State
(Clear Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clear Air Act of 1955, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.); (g) protection of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe
Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, (P.L. 93.523); and (h) protection of endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, (P.L. 93-205).
3
Attachment D (Continued)
12. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq.) related to
protecting components or potential components of the national wide and scenic rivers system.
13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470), EO 11593 (identification
and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation
Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 469a.1 et seq.).
14. Will comply with P.L. 93.348 regarding the protection of human subjects involved in research,
development, and related activities supported by this award of assistance.
15. Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-544, as amended, 7
U.S.C. 2131 et seq.) pertaining to the care, handling, and treatment of warm blooded animals held
for research, teaching, or other activities supported by this award of assistance.
16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.) which
prohibits the use of lead based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures.
17. Will cause to be performed the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the
Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular No. A-133, “Audits of States, Local
Governments and Non-Profit Organizations.”
18. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other Federal laws, executive orders,
regulations and policies governing this program.
B. CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER
RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS - PRIMARY COVERED TRANSACTIONS.
The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its
principals:
1. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or
voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency;
2. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted or had a civil
judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection
with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local)
transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust
statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of
records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
3. Are not presently indicted or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity
(Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph
(1)(b) of this certification; and
4
Attachment D (Continued)
4. Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more
public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.
Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this
certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
C. CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING - Certification for Contracts, Grants,
Loans, and Cooperative Agreements.
By accepting this grant, the signee hereby certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief,
that:
1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the
undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee
of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of
any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the
entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal,
amendment or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a
Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement, the
undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure Form to
Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
3. The signer shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award
documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts
under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and
disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which
reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this
certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section
1352, Title 31, U.S.C. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject
to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
D. CERTIFICATION REGARDING DRUG FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS.
The grantee certifies that it will provide a drug-free workplace by:
1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution,
dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee’s workplace
and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition;
2. Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about:
A. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
B. The grantee’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
5
Attachment D (Continued)
C. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and
D. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring
in the workplace;
3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be
given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (1);
4. Notifying the employee in the statement required in paragraph (1) that, as a condition of
employment under the grant, the employee will:
A. Abide by the terms of the statement; and
B. Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug
statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction;
5. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under
subparagraph (4) (B) from an employer or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction.
Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant
officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the
Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include
the identification number(s) of each affected grant.
6. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under
subparagraph (4) (B) with respect to any employee who is so convicted:
A. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including
termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended, or;
B. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State or local health, law
enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation
of paragraphs (1, (2), (3), (4), (5), (6).
The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of work done in
connection with this specific grant.
Place of Performance (Street address, city, county, state, zip code)
6
Attachment D (Continued)
Check ( ) if there are additional workplaces on file that are not identified above.
E. NONDISCRIMINATION & EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ASSURANCE:
As a condition of the award of financial assistance from the Department of Labor under Title I or WIA,
the grant applicant assures that it will comply with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity
provisions of the following laws:
(1) Section 188 of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA) prohibits discrimination against
all individuals in the United States on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age,
disability, political affiliation, or belief, and against beneficiaries on the basis of either
citizenship/status as a lawfully admitted immigrant authorized to work in the United States or
participation in an WIA Title I - financially assisted program or activity;
(2) Title VI of the Civil Rights of 1964, as amended, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of
race, color and national origin;
(3) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, which prohibits discrimination on
the basis of age; and individuals with disabilities.
(4) The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, which prohibits discrimination on the basis
of age; and
(5) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits the discrimination
on the basis of sex in educational programs.
The grant applicant also assures that it will comply with 29 CFR Part 37 and all other regulations
implementing the laws listed above. This assurance applies to the grant applicant’s operation of the WIA
Title I - financially assisted program or activity, and to all agreements the grant applicant makes to carry
out the WIA Title I - financially assisted program or activity. The grant applicant understands that the
United States has the right to seek judicial enforcement of this assurance.
7
Attachment D (Continued)
FY 2000 Statutory Requirements
(Imposed by Public Law 106-113; November 17, 1999)
Title V – GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 503. (a) No part of any appropriation contained in this Act shall be used, other than for normal
and recognized executive-legislative relationships, for publicity propaganda purposes, for the preparation,
distribution, or use of any kit, pamphlet, booklet, publication, radio, television, or video presentation
designed to support or defeat legislation pending before the Congress or any State legislature, except in
presentation to the Congress or any State legislature itself.
(b) No part of any appropriation contained in this Act shall be used to pay the salary or expenses of
any grant or contract recipient, or agent acting for such recipient, related to any activity designed to
influence legislation or appropriations pending before the Congress or any State legislature.
Sec. 505. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, no funds appropriated under this Act shall
be used to carry out any program of distributing sterile needles or syringes for the hypodermic injection of
any illegal drug.
Sec. 506. (a) Purchase of American-Made Equipment and Products. – It is the sense of the Congress
that, to the greatest extent practicable, all equipment and products purchased with funds made available in
this Act should be American-made.
(b) Notice Requirement, –In providing financial assistance to, or entering into any contract with, any
entity using funds made available in the Act, the head of each Federal agency, to the greatest extent
practicable, shall provide to such entity a notice describing the statement made in subsection (a) by the
Congress.
(c) Prohibition of Contracts with Person Falsely Labeling Products Made in America.–If it has been
finally determined by a court or Federal agency that any person intentionally affixed a label bearing a
“Made in America” inscription, or any inscription with the same meaning, to any product sold in or
shipped in the United States that is not made in the United States, the person shall be ineligible to receive
any contract or subcontract made with funds made available in this Act, pursuant to the debarment,
suspension, and ineligibility procedures described in section 9.400 through 9/409 or title 48, Code of
Federal Regulations.
Sec. 507. When issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposals, bid solicitations and other
documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part with Federal money, all grantees
receiving Federal funds included in this Act, including but not limited to State and local governments and
recipients of Federal research grants, shall clearly state: (1) the percentage of the total costs of the
program or project which will be financed with Federal money; (2) the dollar amount of Federal funds for
the project or program; and (3) percentage and dollar amount of the total costs of the project or program
that will be financed by non-governmental sources.
Sec. 508. (a) None of the funds appropriated under this Act, and none of the funds in any trust fund
to which funds are appropriated under this Act, shall be expended for any abortion.
(b) None of the funds appropriated under this Act, and none of the funds in any trust fund to which
funds are appropriated under this Act, shall be expended for health benefits coverage that includes
coverage of abortion.
8
Attachment D (Continued)
(c) The term “health benefits coverage: means the package of services covered by a managed care
provider or organization pursuant to a contract or other arrangement.
Sec. 509. (a) The limitation established in the preceding section shall not apply to an abortion–
(1) if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest; or
(2) in the case where a woman suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness,
including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, that would,
as certified by a physician, place the woman in danger of death unless an abortion is performed.
(b) Nothing in the preceding section shall be construed as prohibiting the expenditure by a State,
locality, entity, or private person of State , local or private funds (other than a State’s or locality’s
contribution or Medicaid matching funds).
(c) Nothing in the preceding section shall be construed as restricting the ability of any managed care
provider from offering abortion coverage or the ability of a State or locality to contract separately with
such a provider for such cover with State funds (other than a State’s or locality’s contribution of Medicaid
matching funds).
Sec. 510. (a) None of the funds made available in this Act may be used for–
(1) the creation of a human embryo or embryos are for research purposes; or
(2) research in which a human embryo or embryos destroyed, discarded, or knowingly subjected to
risk or injury or death greater than that allowed for research on fetuses in utero under 45 CFR
46.208(a)(2) and section 498(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 289g(b)).
(b) For purposes of this section, the term “human embryo or embryos” includes any organism, not
protected as a human subject under 45 CFR 46 as of the date of the enactment of this Act, that is derived
by fertilization, parthenogenesis, cloning, or any other means from one or more human gametes or human
diploid cells.
Sec. 511. (a) Limitation on Use of Funds for Promotion of Legalization of Controlled Substances. –
None of the funds made available in this Act may be used for any activity that promotes the legalization
of any drug or other substance included in schedule I of the schedules of controlled substances established
by section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812).
(b) Exceptions.–The limitation in subsection (a) shall no apply when there is significant
medical evidence of a therapeutic advantage to the use of such drug or other substance or that federally
sponsored clinical trials are being conducted to determine therapeutic advantage.
Sec. 512. None of the funds made available in this Act may be obligated or expended to enter into or
renew a contract with an entity if –
(1) such an entity is otherwise a contractor with the United States and is subject to the requirement in
section 4212(d) of title 38, United States Code, regarding submission of an annual report to the Secretary
of Labor concerning employment of certain veterans; and
(2) such entity has not submitted a report as required by that section for the most recent year for
which such requirement was applicable to such entity.
Sec. 514. None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to promulgate or adopt any final
standard under section 1173(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320d-2(b)) providing for, or
providing for the assignment of, a unique health identifier for an individual (except in an individual’s
capacity as an employer or a health care provider), until legislation is enacted specifically approving the
standard.
9
Attachment D (Continued)
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. This grant, when executed, establishes a legal relationship between the U. S. Department of Labor
and the grantee. Payments under this grant shall be made through the Advance Payment/Payment
Management System unless otherwise indicated in accordance with 29 CFR Part 97.21.
2. The grantee hereby agrees that any allowable WIA costs incurred by the awardee pursuant to this grant
prior to the obligation of WIA funds by the Department are incurred at the grantee's own risk. The
Department has no responsibility to reimburse such costs in the absence of an obligation.
3. The grantee agrees to comply with the reporting instructions issued by the Indian and Native American
Programs (INAP).
4. Matching Funds:
Will be required for programs under this grant.
X Will not be required for programs under this grant.
5. The Grant Officer's Technical Representative is not authorized to change any of the terms or
conditions of the grant. Such changes, if any, will be accomplished only by the Grant Officer by the
use of a properly executed grant modification.
6. Grantee must receive prior approval from the Department of Labor/Employment and Training
Administration's Property Officer for the purchase and/or lease of property and/or equipment having a
useful life of more than one (1) year and an acquisition cost which equals the lesser of (a) the
capitalization level established by the organization for financial statement purposes or (b) $5,000.
Items of equipment with an acquisition cost of less than $5,000 are considered to be supplies and are
allowable as direct costs of federal awards without specific awarding agency approval. The request
must be directed through your Grant Officer's Technical Representative and must include a detailed
description and cost of the items to be acquired.
7. In compliance with Executive Orders 12876, 12900, 12928, and 13021, the grantee is strongly
encourage to provide sub-granting opportunities to Historically Black Colleges and Universities,
Hispanics serving Institutions, and Tribal Colleges and Universities.
10
Attachment D (Continued)
SPECIAL CLAUSE NO. 1 - INDIRECT COST
SPECIAL NOTE: This clause is to be utilized only for those grantees seeking indirect costs. It is to be
utilized for all affected grants and modifications.
In order to avoid major audit problems, disallowed costs and to receive timely reimbursement of indirect
costs, grantees should take those necessary steps to comply with this clause as well as the critical time
frames for submission of indirect cost proposals.
You are governed by, and must comply with one of the following cost principle categories: (1) Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subparts 31 and 42 apply to private-for-profit contractors; (2) OMB
Circular A-87 applies to state and local governments and Federally-recognized Indian Tribes. States
receiving WIA formula-allocated funds can elect to waive A-87 coverage; (3) OMB Circulars A-21,
A-88 and FAR 42.705-3 apply to educational institutions; (4) OMB Circular A-122 applies to
nonprofit institutions excluding those addressed in the preceding as well as hospitals.
The total amount of grant funds will not be increased to reimburse grantee organizations for costs which
exceed the total award due to indirect cost rates higher than anticipated. In addition, the application of
approved indirect cost rates does not relieve the grantee of any other cost limitations regarding the grant.
INDIRECT COST RATES AND COST ALLOCATION PLANS
Review the following Options and check the applicable statement:
OPTION 1: DOL IS THE ONLY FUNDING SOURCE FOR THIS GRANTEE
DOL is the only funding source for this grantee, therefore no Indirect Cost Rate
Agreement or Cost Allocation Plan is needed.
OPTION 2: GRANTEES WITH MULTIPLE FUNDING SOURCES
Grantees should have either an approved Indirect Cost Rate Agreement or an approved Cost
Allocation Plan. If a grantee does not have an Indirect Cost Rate Agreement or approved Cost
Allocation Plan, a proposal/plan must be sent to the appropriate cognizant Federal agency for
approval. If the Department of Labor (DOL) is your cognizant agency, proposals for indirect cost
rates and supporting data and documentation should be sent to the DCD Negotiator in the appropriate
DOL Regional Office or if applicable, to the DCD National Office whose address and phone number
listed below. In addition, if you do not know your cognizant Federal agency, please call the phone
number listed below:
Director, Division of Cost Determination (DCD)
U. S. Department of Labor, OASAM
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room S-5520
Washington, D. C. 20210
Phone Number: (202) 219-8391
An approved Indirect Cost Rate is in place.
An approved Cost Allocation Plan is in place.
An Indirect Cost Proposal has been submitted to its’ cognizant agency. A copy of the letter
transmitting the proposal is attached.
11
Attachment D (Continued)
SPECIAL CLAUSE NO. 2 KEY OFFICIALS
A. Department of Labor Representatives. The grantee organizations primary contact with the
Department of Labor (DOL) is the INAP Grant Officer's Technical Representative (GOTR) (Federal
Project Officer). Although the GOTR is the primary contact, under no circumstances is the GOTR
authorized to sign grant documents or approve any alterations to the grant involving a change in the
period, scope, price or other terms and conditions of the grant or order requiring the Grant Officer's
approval. Grantees will be notified by INAP of the assigned GOTR and of changes in the
assignment as they occur.
B. Grantee Representatives. Please list below the names and telephone numbers of those individuals
(i.e., signatory official(s), WIA Director, organization's comptroller, contract officer, etc.) who are
authorized and responsible for the operation and the administration of the grant program. A
modification to your grant is not necessary to record changes of listed individuals, except for
signatory officials. However, the INAP GOTR should be advised in writing of changes as they
occur.
NAME & TITLE _________________________________________________
PHONE NO.: _____________________________ Signatory? Yes No
NAME & TITLE _________________________________________________
PHONE NO.: _____________________________ Signatory? Yes No
NAME & TITLE _________________________________________________
PHONE NO.: _____________________________ Signatory? Yes No
NAME & TITLE _________________________________________________
PHONE NO.: _____________________________ Signatory? Yes No
NAME & TITLE _________________________________________________
PHONE NO.: _____________________________ Signatory? Yes No
NAME & TITLE _________________________________________________
PHONE NO.: _____________________________ Signatory? Yes No
NAME & TITLE _________________________________________________
PHONE NO.: _____________________________ Signatory? Yes No
12
Attachment D (Continued)
DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352
(see reverse for public burden disclosure)
1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type:
a. contract a. bid/offer/application a. Initial filing
b. grant b. initial award b. material change
c. cooperative agreement c. post-award For Material Change Only:
d. loan year quarter
e. loan guarantee date of last report
f. loan insurance
4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity: Prime 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and
Subawardee Address of Prime.
Tier if known:
Congressional District, if known: Congressional District, if known:
6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description
CFDA Number, if applicable:
8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:
$
10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Entity b. Individuals Performing Services (including address if different
(if individual, last name, first name, MI): from No. 10a) (last name, first name, MI):
(Attach Continuation Sheet(s) SF-LLL-A, if necessary) (Attach Continuation Sheet(s) SF-LLL-A, if necessary)
11. Amount of Payment (check all that apply): 13. Type of Payment (check all that apply)
actual planned $ a. retainer
b. one-time fee
12. Form of Payment (check all that apply): c. commission
d. contingent fee
a. cash e. deferred
b. in-kind; specify: f. other, specify:
nature value
14. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be Performed and Date(s) of Service, including officer(s), employee(s), or
Member(s)
contacted, for Payment Indicated in item 11:
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) SF-LLL-A, if necessary)
15. Continuation Sheet(s) SF-LLL-A attached: YES NO
16. Information requested through this form is authorized by title 31
U.S.C. section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying activities is a Signature __________________________________________
material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed by
the tier above when this transaction was made or entered into. This Print Name: ____________________________________
disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This information
Title: _______________________________________________
will be reported to the Congress semi-annually and will be available
for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required Telephone Number: Date:__________
disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than
$10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form - LLL-A
13
Attachment D (Continued)
DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES CONTINUATION SHEET
Reporting entity: Page Page
Approved by OMB 0348-0046 Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard - LLL-A
14
Attachment D
CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
Section 18 of the “Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995," signed by the President on December 19, 1995,
requires that any organizations described in section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
which engages in lobbying activities shall not be eligible for the receipt of Federal funds constituting an
award, grant, loan, or any other form.
As an officer of
Company Name
1. This is to certify that our IRS Status is:
an IRS 501 (c) (3) entity
an IRS 501 (c) (4) entity
Other (specify) entity
2. If your organization is a 501(c)(4) entity, as checked under No. 1 above, select one of the
statements below:
we have or plan to engage in lobbying activities.
we have not or will not engage in lobbying activities.
15
Attachment PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2008/TEGL25-07aE.pdf
Attachment E
Supplemental Youth Services
Menu of Goals
Minimum Performance Requirement - at least 60% of Indian and Native American (INA) youth
enrolled in the Supplemental Youth Services program for the program year must attain a minimum of
(2) two of the (13) thirteen goals listed.
1. Completed Job/Readiness/Orientation to the World 7. Enrolled in Job Corps
of Work Training
8 . Improved Basic Skills Level by At Least Two Grades
2. Completed Internship or Vocational Exploration
Program 9. Attained High School Diploma
3. Completed Career Assessment 10. Attained GED
4. Entered Unsubsidized Employment (including 11. Completed Occupational Skills Training
entering the military)
12. Completed Leadership and/or Soft Skills Training
5. Remained in School
13. Entered Other (Non-Supplemental Youth) Training
6. Returned to School Full Time Program
At the end of the program year, DINAP will determine whether a grantee successfully
attained their performance goals for the program year.
Attachment E (Continued)
Supplemental Youth Services Calculation Worksheet
Performance Goals Planned
Success
1. Completed Job/Readiness/Orientation to Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
the World of Work Training will complete, during the course of their program participation, a course of
instruction relating to job readiness or world of work skills, including
training to develop positive work habits, attitudes and behavior, such as
punctuality, regular attendance, presenting a neat appearance, getting along
and working well with others, exhibiting good conduct, following
instructions and completing tasks, accepting constructive criticism from
supervisors and co-workers, showing initiative and reliability, and assuming
the responsibilities involved in maintaining a job. This category also entails
developing an awareness of the labor market and occupational information,
and job search techniques, including preparing resumes and applications and
improving interviewing techniques.
2. Completed Internship or Vocational Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
Exploration Program will complete, during the course of their program participation, a work
internship or a vocational exploration program designed to provide exposure
to alternative career areas.
3. Completed Career Assessment Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
will complete, during the course of their program participation, a formal
career assessment of occupational interests, values, skills, or aptitudes,
leading to an identification of careers for which the participant may be
suited.
4. Entered Unsubsidized Employment Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
(including entering the military) upon termination, will enter non-WIA funded employment, including entry
into the Armed Forces or self-employment.
5. Remained in School Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
are at-risk of dropping out of school but, will be retained in school as a
result of continuing active participation in the Supplemental Youth program.
6. Returned to School Full Time Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
at intake, were not attending school (exclusive of summer), and had not
obtained a high school diploma or equivalent and will return to full-time
secondary school (e.g., junior high school, middle school, and high school)
including alternative school as a result of participating in the Supplemental
Youth program.
7. Enrolled in Job Corps Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
will enroll in Job Corps upon terminating from the Supplemental Youth
Services Program.
8. Improved Basic Skills Level by At Least Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
Two Grades will advance at least two grade levels in either reading or math skills. [Note:
Skill gain must be achieved through active program participation and must
be documented through standardized testing].
9. Attained High School Diploma Enter the number of at-risk youth participants, enrolled for the program year,
who will attain a State-recognized high school diploma while enrolled in the
Supplemental Youth Program as a result of program participation.
10. Attained GED Enter the number of at-risk youth participants, enrolled for the program year,
who will attain a State-recognized GED while enrolled in the Supplemental
Youth Program as a result of program participation.
11. Completed Occupational Skills Training Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year, who
will complete occupational skills training while enrolled in the Supplemental
Youth Program as a result of program participation. [Note: occupational
skills training includes (1) vocational education and (2) on-the-job training].
2
Attachment E (Continued)
Performance Goals Planned
Success
12. Completed Leadership and/or Soft Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year,
Skills Training who will complete during the course of their program participation a
course of instruction that is intended to impart skills in leadership or
personal skills, such as developing motivation and adaptability,
obtaining effective coping and problem-solving skills, acquiring an
improved self image, clarifying values and developing personal
understanding. [Note: This category also includes providing exposure
to post-secondary educational opportunities; community and service
learning projects; peer-centered activities, including peer mentoring
and tutoring; organizational and team work training, including team
leadership training; training in decision-making, including
determining priorities; citizenship training, including life skills
training such as parenting and budgeting of resources; and positive
social behaviors].
13. Entered Other (Non-Supplemental Enter the number of youth participants, enrolled for the program year,
Youth) Training Program who will enter other training, including occupational skills training or
postsecondary education, using funds other than those from the INA
Supplemental Youth Services Program which builds upon and does
not duplicate training received under Section 166.
14. Attain at Least Two Goals Enter the number of participants, enrolled for the program year, who
will attain at least two goals.
15. Total Number of Participants to be served. Enter the total number of participants to be served for the program
year, including terminees, and youth carried over to the next program
year.
3
Attachment PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2008/TEGL25-07aF.pdf
Attachment F
1 PY 08 WIA Performance Standards Worksheet ) A. G r a n t e e ' s Name: 1 0 . G r a n t e e ' s Number: I
1 f o r I n d i a n and N a t i v e American Grantees I I I
I -1 I I
I I I I
/ C . Type o f Standard: I 0. Date C a l c u l a t e d : IE. Performance Measure: I
1 [XI Initial [ ] F i n a l 1 03/04/08 I ENTERED EMPLOYMENT RATE I
I I I I I I
I F. L o c a l F a c t o r s IG. F a c t o r l H . Average 11. D i f f e r - I J . Weights I K . E f f e c t o f I
I I V a l u e s ( S e r v i c e 1 ence I I Local Factors I
I I I L e v e l s I ( G Minus HI1 I on Performance I
I I I o r Local I I 1 Expectations, I
I I I Conditions1 I I (I Times J) (
1 1 . % Aged 14 t o 21 1 28.9 1 23.2 1 5.7 1
I I I I I
1 2 . % Wlthout H i g h School Degree 1 32.2 ( 23.0 ( 9.2 (
I 1 I I I
1 3. % P u b l i c A s s i s t a n c e R e c i p i e n t s 1 31.1 1 40.8 1 -9.7 1
I I I I I
1 1
5 . % Employed i n M a n u f a c t u r i n g 17.9 1 10.8 1 7.1 1
I I I I I
1 6. N a t i v e American Joblessness Rate 1 39.7 1 47.3 1 -7.6 (
I I I I I
1 7. Pct F a m i l i e s i n A g r i c u l t u r e 1 1.7 1 1.9 1 -0.2 1
I I I I I
( L. T o t a l Adjustments 1 7.7 1
I I I
NOTE: FACTOR VALUES I N COLUMN G ARE M. Departure P o i n t ( + 56.0 I
DERIVED FROM PY 06 I I I
I I I
( N. Recommended Performance I I
RANGE ADJUSTMENT I S BASED ON I Goal ( L + M) 1 63.7 I
90 TERMINEES I N PY 06 I I I
I I I
I 0 . Range Adjustment 1 17.4 I
I I 1
I I I
I P. Performance Standard I I
I (Minimally Acceptable Level: 1 46.3 1
1 N Minus O ) I I
Attachment PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2008/TEGL25-07aG.pdf
Attachment G
U.S. Department
U.S. Department of
ofLabor
Labor
Employment and Training Administration
Employment
WIA Title 1, Sec. and Training
166 Supplemental Administration
Youth Services for Native Americans
WIA Title 1, Sec. 166 Supplemental Youth Services
PY 2008 Youth Allotment for Native Americans
PY 2008 Youth Allotments
Appropriation Total $13,861,042
State Grantee Amount
1 1 AL Inter-Tribal Council of Alabama $4,025
2 1 AL Poarch Band of Creek Indians $1,073
3 2 AK Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Association $12,073
4 2 AK Association of Village Council Presidents $165,274
5 2 AK Bristol Bay Native Association $48,294
6 2 AK Central Council of Tlingit and Haida $68,417
7 2 AK Chugachmiut $5,902
8 2 AK Cook Inlet Tribal Council $147,030
9 2 AK Copper River Native Association $9,390
10 2 AK Kawerak Incorporated $60,368
11 2 AK Kenaitze Indian Tribe $22,806
12 2 AK Kodiak Area Native Association $9,390
13 2 AK Maniilaq Association Inc. $52,319
14 2 AK Metlakatla Indian Community $5,366
15 2 AK Orutsararmuit Native Council $16,098
16 2 AK Tanana Chiefs Conference, Inc. $114,028
17 4 AZ Affiliation of Arizona Indian Centers. Inc. $0
18 4 AZ American Indian Association of Tucson $0
19 4 AZ Colorado River Indian Tribes $32,196
20 4 AZ Gila River Indian Community $211,959
21 4 AZ Hopi Tribal Council $118,053
22 4 AZ Hualapai Tribe $20,123
23 4 AZ Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. $38,367
24 4 AZ Native Americans for Community Action $0
25 4 AZ Navajo Nation $3,077,431
26 4 AZ Pasqua Yaqui Tribe $55,002
27 4 AZ Phoenix Indian Center, Inc. $0
28 4 AZ Quechan Indian Tribe $17,440
29 4 AZ Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Council $52,319
30 4 AZ San Carlos Apache Tribe $222,691
31 4 AZ Tohono O'Odham Nation $224,033
Page 1 of 5
32 4 AZ White Mountain Apache Tribe $266,961
33 5 AR American Indian Center of Arkansas, Inc. $0
34 6 CA California Indian Manpower Consortium, Inc. $151,859
35 6 CA Candelaria American Indian Council $0
36 6 CA Indian Human Resources Center, Inc. $0
37 6 CA Northern CA Indian Development Council, Inc. $24,415
38 6 CA Southern CA Indian Center, Inc. $0
39 6 CA Tule River Tribal Council $8,050
40 6 CA United Indian Nations, Inc. $0
41 6 CA Ya-Ka-Ama Indian Education & Development $0
42 8 CO Denver Indian Center $0
43 8 CO Southern Ute Indian Tribe $10,732
44 8 CO Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe $22,806
45 12 FL Florida Governor's Council on Indian Affairs $0
46 12 FL Miccosukee Corporation $5,634
47 15 HI Alu Like, Inc. $1,875,435
48 16 ID Nez Perce Tribe $15,561
49 16 ID Shoshone-Bannock Tribes $57,685
50 18 IN American Indian Center of Indiana, Inc. $0
51 20 KS United Tribes of Kansas and S.E. Nebraska $10,464
52 22 LA Inter-Tribal Council of Louisiana, Inc. $4,025
53 23 ME Penobscot Nation $25,221
54 25 MA Mashpee-Wampanoag Indian Tribal Council, Inc. $0
55 25 MA North American Indian Center of Boston, Inc. $0
56 26 MI Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians $0
57 26 MI Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan, Inc. $29,513
58 26 MI Michigan Indian Employment and Training Services, Inc. $0
59 26 MI North American Indian Association of Detroit $0
60 26 MI Potawatomi Indian Nation $0
61 26 MI Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians $19,586
62 26 MI Southeastern Michigan Indians. Inc. $0
63 27 MN American Indian OIC $0
64 27 MN Bois Forte R.B.C. $9,123
65 27 MN Fond Du Lac R.B.C. $18,244
66 27 MN Leech Lake R.B.C. $53,392
67 27 MN Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians $23,879
68 27 MN Minneapolis American Indian Center $0
69 27 MN Red Lake Tribal Council $84,515
Page 2 of 5
70 27 MN White Earth R.B.C. $55,002
71 28 MS Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians $68,149
72 29 MO American Indian Council $9,390
73 30 MT Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes $138,176
74 30 MT B.C. of the Chippewa Cree Tribe $38,904
75 30 MT Blackfeet Tribal Business Council $127,443
76 30 MT Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes $139,518
77 30 MT Crow Indian Tribe $88,272
78 30 MT Fort Belknap Indian Community $50,977
79 30 MT Montana United Indian Association $0
80 30 MT Northern Cheyenne Tribe $99,272
81 31 NE Indian Center, Inc. $0
82 31 NE Omaha Tribe of Nebraska $46,953
83 31 NE Winnebago Tribe $21,464
84 32 NV Inter-Tribal Council of Nevada $46,417
85 32 NV Las Vegas Indian Center, Inc. $0
86 32 NV Reno Sparks Indian Colony $9,390
87 32 NV Shoshone-Paiute Tribes $14,757
88 35 NM Alamo Navajo School Board $49,636
89 35 NM Eight Northern Indian Pueblo Council $27,367
90 35 NM Five Sandoval Indian Pueblos, Inc. $93,638
91 35 NM Jicarilla Apache Tribe $28,171
92 35 NM Mescalero Apache Tribe $61,709
93 35 NM National Indian Youth Council $0
94 35 NM Pueblo of Acoma $30,855
95 35 NM Pueblo of Isleta $11,806
96 35 NM Pueblo of Laguna $37,563
97 35 NM Pueblo of Taos $18,781
98 35 NM Pueblo of Zuni $130,126
99 35 NM Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. $30,855
100 35 NM Santa Clara Indian Pueblo $13,415
101 35 NM Santo Domingo Tribe $45,611
102 36 NY American Indian Community House, Inc. $9,123
103 36 NY Native American Community Services of Erie & Niagara County $0
104 36 NY Native American Cultural Center, Inc. $3,219
105 36 NY Seneca Nation of Indians $32,196
106 36 NY St. Regis Mohawk Tribe $22,806
107 37 NC Cumberland County Association for Indian People $0
Page 3 of 5
108 37 NC Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians $57,685
109 37 NC Guilford Native American Association $0
110 37 NC Haliwa-Saponi Tribe, Inc. $0
111 37 NC Lumbee Regional Development Association $0
112 37 NC Metrolina Native American Association $0
113 37 NC North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs $0
114 38 ND Spirit Lake Sioux Tribe $75,125
115 38 ND Standing Rock Sioux Tribe $124,761
116 38 ND Three Affiliated Tribes - Ft. Berthold Reservation $56,344
117 38 ND Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians $128,785
118 38 ND United Tribes Technical College $0
119 39 OH North America Indian Cultural Centers $0
120 40 OK Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma $13,146
121 40 OK Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma $677,733
122 40 OK Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes $104,638
123 40 OK Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma $203,641
124 40 OK Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma $292,450
125 40 OK Citizen Band Potawatomi Indians of Oklahoma $219,740
126 40 OK Comanche Tribe of Oklahoma $72,442
127 40 OK Creek Nation of Oklahoma $356,842
128 40 OK Four Tribes Consortium of Oklahoma $68,149
129 40 OK Inter-Tribal Council of N.E. Oklahoma $27,098
130 40 OK Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma $90,418
131 40 OK Osage Tribal Council $52,319
132 40 OK OTOE-Missouria Tribe of Oklahoma $16,903
133 40 OK Pawnee Tribe of Oklahoma $14,757
134 40 OK Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma $56,075
135 40 OK Seminole Nation of Oklahoma $72,442
136 40 OK Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma $28,171
137 40 OK United Urban Indian Council, Inc. $199,885
138 40 OK Wyandotte Tribe of Oklahoma $0
139 41 OR Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians $1,073
140 41 OR Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation $14,757
141 41 OR Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs $41,587
142 41 OR Organization of Forgotten Americans $6,171
143 42 PA Council of Three Rivers $0
144 44 RI Rhode Island Indian Council $0
145 45 SC South Carolina Indian Development Council, Inc. $2,683
Page 4 of 5
146 46 SD Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe $142,201
147 46 SD Lower Brule Sioux Tribe $20,123
148 46 SD Oglala Sioux Tribe $417,210
149 46 SD Rosebud Sioux Tribe $245,497
150 46 SD Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe $59,027
151 46 SD United Sioux Tribes Development Corp. $13,415
152 46 SD Yankton Sioux Tribe $53,661
153 48 TX Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribal Council $1,073
154 48 TX Urban Inter-Tribal Center of Texas $0
155 48 TX Ysleta del Sur Pueblo $17,440
156 49 UT Indian Training & Education Center $5,902
157 49 UT Ute Indian Tribe $60,368
158 50 VT Abenaki Self-Help Association/ NH Ind. Council $0
159 51 VA Mattaponi Pamunkey Monacan Consortium $0
160 53 WA American Indian Community Center $18,244
161 53 WA Colville Confederated Tribes $49,636
162 53 WA Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Nation $109,736
163 53 WA Makah Tribal Council $13,415
164 53 WA Puyallup Tribe of Indians $14,488
165 53 WA Seattle Indian Center $0
166 53 WA Spokane Reservation $24,148
167 53 WA The Tulalip Tribes $21,464
168 53 WA Western WA Indian Employment. and Training Program $105,443
169 55 WI Ho-Chunk Nation $4,829
170 55 WI Lac Courte Oreilles Tribal Governing Board $33,538
171 55 WI Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa $12,073
172 55 WI Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin $49,636
173 55 WI Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin $16,098
174 55 WI Spotted Eagle, Inc. $0
175 55 WI Stockbridge-Munsee Community $3,756
176 55 WI Wisconsin Indian Consortium $26,562
177 56 WY Eastern Shoshone Tribe $35,952
178 56 WY Northern Arapaho Business Council $80,759
Page 5 of 5
Attachment PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2008/TEGL25-07aH.pdf
Attachment H
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
WIA Title 1, Sec. 166 Adult Services for Native Americans
PY 2008 Adult Allotments
Appropriation Total $52,757,931
Less TAT $527,579
Grantee Total $52,230,352
State Grantee Name Amount
1 1 AL Inter-Tribal Council of Alabama $277,190
2 1 AL Poarch Band of Creek Indians $88,865
3 2 AK Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Association $26,928
4 2 AK Association of Village Council Presidents $386,373
5 2 AK Bristol Bay Native Association $111,316
6 2 AK Central Council of Tlingit and Haida $181,928
7 2 AK Chugachmiut $26,237
8 2 AK Cook Inlet Tribal Council $416,591
9 2 AK Copper River Native Association $17,627
10 2 AK Kawerak Incorporated $144,916
11 2 AK Kenaitze Indian Tribe $41,637
12 2 AK Kodiak Area Native Association $27,362
13 2 AK Maniilaq Manpower $108,540
14 2 AK Metlakatla Indian Community $17,554
15 2 AK Orutsararmuit Native Council $49,720
16 2 AK Tanana Chiefs Conference, Inc. $272,815
17 4 AZ Affiliation of Arizona Indian Centers, Inc. $291,687
18 4 AZ American Indian Association of Tucson $325,398
19 4 AZ Colorado River Indian Tribes $59,581
20 4 AZ Gila River Indian Community $491,148
21 4 AZ Hopi Tribal Council $209,160
22 4 AZ Hualapai Reservation and Trust lands $31,340
23 4 AZ Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. $76,735
24 4 AZ Native Americans for Community Action $190,197
25 4 AZ Navajo Nation $5,866,074
26 4 AZ Pasqua Yaqui Tribe $96,703
27 4 AZ Phoenix Indian Center, Inc. $890,999
28 4 AZ Quechan Indian Tribe $32,332
29 4 AZ Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Council $81,466
30 4 AZ San Carlos Apache Tribe $370,912
31 4 AZ Tohono O'Odham Nation $356,687
Page 1 of 5
32 4 AZ White Mountain Apache Tribe $436,921
33 5 AR American Indian Center of Arkansas, Inc. $529,693
34 6 CA California Indian Manpower Consortium, Inc. $3,280,324
35 6 CA Candelaria American Indian Council $308,677
36 6 CA Indian Human Resources Center, Inc. $323,540
37 6 CA Northern CA Indian Development Council, Inc. $220,985
38 6 CA Southern CA Indian Center, Inc. $1,580,742
39 6 CA Tule River Tribal Council $117,970
40 6 CA United Indian Nations, Inc. $424,584
41 6 CA Ya-Ka-Ama Indian Education & Development $60,253
42 8 CO Denver Indian Center $598,091
43 8 CO Southern Ute Indian Tribe $36,038
44 8 CO Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe $83,054
45 12 FL Florida Governor's Council on Indian Affairs $1,098,962
46 12 FL Miccosukee Corporation $114,430
47 15 HI Alu Like, Inc. $1,266,654
48 16 ID Nez Perce Tribe $65,991
49 16 ID Shoshone-Bannock Tribes $171,425
50 18 IN American Indian Center of Indiana, Inc. $226,289
51 20 KS United Tribes of Kansas and S.E. Nebraska $191,961
52 22 LA Inter-Tribal Council of Louisiana, Inc. $465,403
53 23 ME Penobscot Nation $180,349
54 25 MA Mashpee-Wampanoag Indian Tribal Council, Inc. $55,496
55 25 MA North American Indian Center of Boston, Inc. $200,916
56 26 MI Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians $29,656
57 26 MI Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan, Inc. $64,599
58 26 MI Michigan Indian Employment and Training Services, Inc. $441,646
59 26 MI North American Indian Association of Detroit $131,715
60 26 MI Potawatomi Indian Nation $57,364
61 26 MI Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians $157,849
62 26 MI Southeastern Michigan Indians. Inc. $70,470
63 27 MN American Indian OIC $246,186
64 27 MN Bois Forte R.B.C. $18,822
65 27 MN Fond Du Lac R.B.C. $183,645
66 27 MN Leech Lake R.B.C. $141,644
67 27 MN Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians $50,990
68 27 MN Minneapolis American Indian Center $326,776
69 27 MN Red Lake Tribal Council $205,262
Page 2 of 5
70 27 MN White Earth R.B.C. $111,452
71 28 MS Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians $277,614
72 29 MO American Indian Council $682,505
73 30 MT Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes $252,601
74 30 MT B.C. of the Chippewa Cree Tribe $130,561
75 30 MT Blackfeet Tribal Business Council $265,919
76 30 MT Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes $261,358
77 30 MT Crow Indian Tribe $152,184
78 30 MT Fort Belknap Indian Community $112,879
79 30 MT Montana United Indian Association $317,280
80 30 MT Northern Cheyenne Tribe $197,817
81 31 NE Indian Center, Inc. $261,692
82 31 NE Omaha Tribe of Nebraska $73,297
83 31 NE Winnebago Tribe $41,413
84 32 NV Inter-Tribal Council of Nevada $254,589
85 32 NV Las Vegas Indian Center, Inc. $176,700
86 32 NV Reno Sparks Indian Colony $15,716
87 32 NV Shoshone-Paiute Tribes $112,911
88 35 NM Alamo Navajo School Board $82,440
89 35 NM Eight Northern Indian Pueblo Council $62,529
90 35 NM Five Sandoval Indian Pueblos, Inc. $141,701
91 35 NM Jicarilla Apache Tribe $57,128
92 35 NM Mescalero Apache Tribe $81,079
93 35 NM National Indian Youth Council $1,480,573
94 35 NM Pueblo of Acoma $125,954
95 35 NM Pueblo of Isleta $36,910
96 35 NM Pueblo of Laguna $80,675
97 35 NM Pueblo of Taos $37,663
98 35 NM Pueblo of Zuni $263,696
99 35 NM Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. $83,337
100 35 NM Santa Clara Indian Pueblo $30,010
101 35 NM Santo Domingo Tribe $92,659
102 36 NY American Indian Community House, Inc. $1,064,583
103 36 NY Native American Community Services of Erie & Niagara Counties $147,302
104 36 NY Native American Cultural Center, Inc. $192,256
105 36 NY Seneca Nation of Indians $220,100
106 36 NY St. Regis Mohawk Tribe $128,653
107 37 NC Cumberland County Association for Indian People $60,136
Page 3 of 5
108 37 NC Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians $152,994
109 37 NC Guilford Native American Association $72,480
110 37 NC Haliwa-Saponi Tribe, Inc. $56,467
111 37 NC Lumbee Regional Development Association $949,302
112 37 NC Metrolina Native American Association $108,405
113 37 NC North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs $275,085
114 38 ND Spirit Lake Sioux Tribe $144,464
115 38 ND Standing Rock Sioux Tribe $209,141
116 38 ND Three Affiliated Tribes - Ft. Berthold Reservation $174,680
117 38 ND Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians $284,761
118 38 ND United Tribes Technical College $222,882
119 39 OH North America Indian Cultural Centers $488,419
120 40 OK Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma $21,668
121 40 OK Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma $1,254,875
122 40 OK Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes $150,266
123 40 OK Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma $343,500
124 40 OK Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma $551,732
125 40 OK Citizen Band Potawatomi Indians of Oklahoma $308,057
126 40 OK Comanche Tribe of Oklahoma $146,748
127 40 OK Creek Nation of Oklahoma $690,089
128 40 OK Four Tribes Consortium of Oklahoma $92,655
129 40 OK Inter-Tribal Council of N.E. Oklahoma $71,135
130 40 OK Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma $122,021
131 40 OK Osage Tribal Council $93,119
132 40 OK OTOE-Missouria Tribe of Oklahoma $31,432
133 40 OK Pawnee Tribe of Oklahoma $29,942
134 40 OK Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma $78,487
135 40 OK Seminole Nation of Oklahoma $95,747
136 40 OK Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma $59,908
137 40 OK United Urban Indian Council, Inc. $349,543
138 40 OK Wyandotte Tribe of Oklahoma $104,566
139 41 OR Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians $420,151
140 41 OR Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation $26,212
141 41 OR Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs $122,984
142 41 OR Organization of Forgotten Americans $284,863
143 42 PA Council of Three Rivers $898,825
144 44 RI Rhode Island Indian Council $608,183
145 45 SC South Carolina Indian Development Council, Inc. $236,031
Page 4 of 5
146 46 SD Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe $215,629
147 46 SD Lower Brule Sioux Tribe $54,221
148 46 SD Oglala Sioux Tribe $638,927
149 46 SD Rosebud Sioux Tribe $470,403
150 46 SD Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe $119,992
151 46 SD United Sioux Tribes Development Corp. $544,699
152 46 SD Yankton Sioux Tribe $104,221
153 48 TX Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribal Council $846,909
154 48 TX Urban Inter-Tribal Center of Texas $373,632
155 48 TX Ysleta del Sur Pueblo $627,062
156 49 UT Indian Training & Education Center $343,473
157 49 UT Ute Indian Tribe $114,220
158 50 VT Abenaki Self-Help Association/ NH Indian Council $78,120
159 51 VA Mattaponi Pamunkey Monacan Consortium $242,655
160 53 WA American Indian Community Center $389,539
161 53 WA Colville Confederated Tribes $176,470
162 53 WA Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Nation $195,145
163 53 WA Makah Tribal Council $33,049
164 53 WA Puyallup Tribe of Indians $35,380
165 53 WA Seattle Indian Center $275,767
166 53 WA Spokane Reservation $38,655
167 53 WA The Tulalip Tribes $42,820
168 53 WA Western Washington Indian Employment and Training Program $807,886
169 55 WI Ho-Chunk Nation $169,477
170 55 WI Lac Courte Oreilles Tribal Governing Board $82,295
171 55 WI Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa $40,769
172 55 WI Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin $95,159
173 55 WI Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin $159,004
174 55 WI Spotted Eagle, Inc. $210,100
175 55 WI Stockbridge-Munsee Community $53,706
176 55 WI Wisconsin Indian Consortium $82,440
177 56 WY Eastern Shoshone Tribe $124,946
178 56 WY Northern Arapaho Business Council $212,501
Page 5 of 5
What does federal law require today?
This guidance has been withdrawn. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace