Back to Federal guidance
2010 TAA data validation waiver
Summary ETA told states that Trade Adjustment Assistance data element validation was not required for fiscal year 2010 while states implemented the revised reporting system. It stressed that the waiver was partial: states still had to collect source documentation. ETA now lists this year-specific advisory Canceled.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
TEGL No. 24-10
Date issued
May 9, 2011
Status
Withdrawn
ETA lists this advisory Canceled as of 2026-10-24; the signed letter prints Expiration Date: Continuing and Rescissions: None. Its waiver applied only to fiscal year 2010 data element validation.
Status last verified October 24, 2026
Is this still the rule?
This document has been withdrawn. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
Accessible letter PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2011/TEGL24-10ACC.pdf
CLASSIFICATION
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION Data Validation
ADVISORY SYSTEM CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
OPDR
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DATE
Washington, D.C. 20210 May 9, 2011
ADVISORY: TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO. 24-10
TO: STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES
STATE WORKFORCE LIAISONS
FROM: JANE OATES /s/
Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT: Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) Data Element Validation for Fiscal Year
(FY) 2010
1. Purpose. To provide states with notice that TAA data element validation is not
required for FY 2010.
2. References.
Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) 31-09, Program Year
2009/Fiscal Year 2010 Performance Reporting and Data Validation Timelines
TEGL 6-09, Instructions for Implementing the Revised 2010 Trade Adjustment
Assistance Trade Activity Participant Report (TAPR)
3. Background. TAA data element validation was first initiated several years ago as part of a
unified Employment and Training Administration (ETA) response to a report published by
the Office of the Inspector General. This report raised doubts about the reliability and
consistency with which each state calculated the aggregate Workforce Investment Act (WIA)
outcome data used to report on the program’s outcomes to the Secretary of Labor and
Congress. Unlike WIA, states do not perform their own outcome calculations for TAA, but
report individual records that are used by ETA to calculate aggregate outcomes, which
ensures consistency of aggregate calculations. Therefore, the emphasis in TAA has been on
the reliability of the individual data elements reported. Between FY 2005 and FY 2009,
states performed TAA data element validation on 17 data elements that were reported under
the old Trade Activity Participant Report reporting format, matching the reported data to
source documentation.
In FY 2010 and continuing into FY 2011, states have undergone an intensive effort to
implement the new TAPR. In addition to the reengineering required to respond to the
consolidation of three TAA reports into the single streamlined TAPR format, states have
been making significant efforts to improve the reliability of their data by complying with 250
edit checks that have been implemented, with approximately 80 edit checks planned for
implementation on July 1, 2011. Some states are still working on cleaning up and
automating systems to coordinate data and improve their ability to comply with the existing
RESCISSIONS EXPIRATION DATE
None Continuing
report level logic-based cross-validation checks. In addition, the reversion of the program to
the Trade Adjustment Assistance Reform Act of 2002 on February 15, 2011, requires
additional reprogramming at the state level and devotion of resources to implementation
activities. Shifting resources to data validation at this time would reduce the resources
available to implement program reversion.
4. Action Requested. States should notify all relevant personnel within their states that data
element validation will not be required for FY 2010, so that limited state resources can be
focused on program reversion efforts. However, states should know that this is a partial
waiver of Data Element Validation requirements; it does not apply to the collection of
appropriate source documentation. Data collection is still mandatory.
5. Inquiries. Contact your ETA Regional Office Performance Specialist or Trade Specialist for
further information.
2
What does federal law require today?
This guidance has been withdrawn. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace