Back to Federal guidance

H-2A transportation reimbursement when workers change jobs

Summary ETA explained which employer bore return transportation costs when an H-2A or U.S. worker moved to another job after completing a contract. It distinguished later H-2A work from jobs outside the H-2A program and gave five examples. Change 1 rescinded this letter and corrected two of those examples, so readers should use that later guidance.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
TEGL No. 23-01
Date issued
April 30, 2002
Status
Rescinded
TEGL 23-01, Change 1 (August 2, 2002) expressly rescinds this letter and corrects examples (ii) and (iv) on page 3. ETA also labels the base advisory Canceled.
Status last verified October 25, 2026

Is this still the rule?

This document has been rescinded. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.

This document has been rescinded
TEGL 23-01, Change 1 (August 2, 2002) expressly rescinds this letter and corrects examples (ii) and (iv) on page 3. ETA also labels the base advisory Canceled. It no longer reflects the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

Signed letter

Official PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2002/TEGL23-01.pdf

                                                       CLASSIFICATION
      Employment and Training Administration           H-2A Program
                 Advisory System                       CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
            U.S. Department of Labor                   OWS
             Washington, D.C. 20210                    DATE
                                                       April 30, 2002

TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO. 23-01

TO:                            ALL STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES
                               ALL STATE WORKFORCE LIAISONS
                               ALL WORKER ADJUSTMENT LIAISONS
                               ALL ONE-STOP CENTER SYSTEM LEADS

                                       /S/
FROM:                          EMILY STOVER DeROCCO
                               Assistant Secretary

SUBJECT:                       Clarification of Transportation Requirements Under the
                               H-2A Program

1. Purpose. To clarify the employer’s requirements to provide transportation reimbursement to workers
in the H-2A temporary foreign agricultural worker program.

2. Reference. 20 C.F.R. 655.102(b)(5)(i) and (ii), 55 Fed. Reg. 20500, 20507 (June 1, 1987).

3. Background. There have been a number of questions regarding the regulatory provisions governing
the H-2A employer’s obligation to reimburse transportation expenses for foreign and domestic workers.

U.S. workers, and in some cases H-2A workers, may go from a current H-2A employer to a
subsequent employer. When this happens, questions are raised regarding which, if any, employer has
the obligation to pay for (or provide) transportation back to the place from which the worker was
recruited.

Workers have a right to make an informed decision regarding the economic benefits of a subsequent
non-H-2A job and weigh these benefits against the loss of the transportation benefit.



 RESCISSIONS                                                EXPIRATION DATE
 FM No. 22-98
                                                            Continuing

                                                      2
State and regional staff will attempt to assist former workers obtain transportation assistance either
voluntarily from employers or through other sources.

4. Pertinent Regulatory Provisions. The following regulatory provisions apply:

20 C.F.R. 655.102(b) (5) (i) “...the employer shall pay the worker for costs incurred by the worker for
transportation and daily subsistence from the place from which the worker has come to work for the
employer to the place of employment.”

20 C.F.R. 655.102(b) (5) (ii) “Transportation from place of employment. If the worker completes the
work contract period, the employer shall provide or pay for the worker’s transportation and daily
subsistence from the place of employment to the place from which the worker, disregarding intervening
employment, has come to work for the employer, or, if the worker has contracted with a subsequent
employer who has not agreed in that contract to provide or pay for the worker’s transportation and
daily subsistence expenses from the employer’s worksite to such subsequent employer’s worksite, the
employer shall provide or pay for such expenses; except that, if the worker has contracted for
employment with a subsequent employer who, in that contract, has agreed to pay for the worker’s
transportation and daily subsistence expenses from the employer’s worksite to such subsequent
employer’s worksite, the employer is not required to provide or pay for such expenses.”

20 C.F.R. 655.102(b)(5)(i) and (ii), 55 Fed. Reg. 20500 (June 1, 1987) (Supplemental Information)
“...the employer must offer to pay for (or provide) the worker’s transportation home, or wherever the
worker began the series of jobs culminating at the current place of employment....H-2A workers may
be authorized to go from “criteria” employment...to other criteria employment....This effectively
places the requirement on the H-2A worker’s final criteria employer to pay for (or provide)
the H-2A worker’s transportation “home.” (bold added)

“U.S. workers, however, may go from “criteria” employment (i.e., where they have H-2A co-workers
in the same agricultural activity) to either criteria or non-criteria employment....The transportation
“home” requirement is assumed by the next criteria employer...” (bold added)

If the U.S. worker’s subsequent employer is a non-criteria employer, ...and unless that
subsequent employer offers to pay for...transportation “home”, or to further employment, it is the
worker’s responsibility to obtain transportation... The transportation “home” requirement...is
not assumed by the non-criteria employer...” (bold added)

“If the U.S. worker has no subsequent employer, the current employer must offer to pay for (or
provide) the worker’s transportation home, or wherever the worker began the series of jobs culminating
at the current place of employment.”

                                                   3

5. Policy.

       a. In general, the final H-2A employer has responsibility for the trip home when the contract is
completed, but only when there is no subsequent employer.

        “Home” is where the worker was originally recruited. However, if subsequent employment is
involved and the worker, whether H-2A or U.S., is referred from one H-2A employer to a subsequent
H-2A employer, the last H-2A employer is responsible for the transportation home once the “final”
contract is completed.

        b. When there is a non H-2A subsequent employer, the worker becomes responsible for
his/her own transportation costs home.

         c. When the regulations were written, it was not contemplated that an H-2A worker could go
on to work for an employer in another legal status - - such as H-2B, which has no transportation
requirement. It is ETA’s position that in this case, neither employer has an obligation under the H-2A
regulations to provide transportation home.

        Examples (assume contracts are completed):

        (i) U.S. worker is recruited in Texas by a Michigan H-2A employer, and the worker goes on
to a Wisconsin H-2A employer. The Wisconsin employer is responsible for transportation back to
Texas.

         (ii) U.S. worker is recruited in Texas by a Michigan H-2A employer, and the worker goes on
to a New York non-H-2A harvest job. If the subsequent, Michigan non-H-2A employer does not
offer to pay for (or provide) the U.S. worker’s transportation from the current place of employment to
the subsequent place of employment, the Michigan H-2A employer is required to pay for (or provide)
such transportation. The transportation home requirement is not assumed by either employer and it is the
worker’s responsibility to obtain such transportation from some other source.

        (iii) H-2A worker is recruited in Jamaica by a Connecticut H-2A employer. The
H-2A worker then moves (after an approved visa status change petition) to another certified
H-2A employer in New York. After completion of the contract, the New York H-2A employer is
responsible for transportation home to Jamaica.

         (iv) H-2A worker is recruited in Jamaica by a Connecticut H-2A employer. The H-2A
worker then moves (after an approved visa status change petition) to a Maine H-2B forestry employer.
 If the subsequent, Maine H-2B employer does not offer to pay for (or provide) the worker’s
transportation from the current place of employment to the subsequent place of employment, the
Connecticut H-2A employer is required to pay for (or provide) such transportation. DOL regulations
do not require either employer to pay for transportation back to Jamaica. It is the worker’s
responsibility to obtain such transportation from some other source.

                                                   4


       (v) H-2A worker is recruited in Jamaica by a Connecticut H-2A employer. The H-2A worker
then moves (after an approved visa status change petition) to H-2B employment with the same
employer or an entity owned by the same employer. The H-2A employer is required to pay for (or
provide) transportation home for the worker.

6. Action Required. State Workforce Agencies are requested to:

       a. Inform appropriate state and regional office staff of above policy;

       b. Inform worker advocates and outreach workers of these provisions (pre-harvest
       meetings are one means of disseminating this information); and

       c. Work with advocacy groups and the regional-state monitor advocate network in
       attempting to provide voluntary transportation reimbursement or other assistance to
       workers who might find themselves in a situation where no employer is under an
       obligation to pay for the worker’s transportation home.

7. Inquiries. Questions should be directed to Charlene Giles at (202) 693-2950.

What does federal law require today?

This guidance has been rescinded. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace