Back to Federal guidance

2004 state customer satisfaction survey weights

Summary ETA gave states the weights to calculate 2004 customer satisfaction scores for workforce program participants, employers and job seekers. It also identified which exit cohorts to use for that year's reports and supplied a state-by-state weight table. ETA now labels the historical advisory Canceled.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
TEGL No. 11-04
Date issued
November 30, 2004
Status
Rescinded
ETA labels this historical advisory Canceled as of October 25, 2026; its listing does not name a cancellation instrument. The weights and reporting periods apply to program year 2004.
Status last verified October 25, 2026

Is this still the rule?

This document has been rescinded. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.

This document has been rescinded
ETA labels this historical advisory Canceled as of October 25, 2026; its listing does not name a cancellation instrument. The weights and reporting periods apply to program year 2004. It no longer reflects the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ADVISORY SYSTEM
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Washington, D.C. 20210
CLASSIFICATION: ACSI
CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL: OWI
DATE: November 30, 2004

ADVISORY: TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO. 11-04

TO: ALL STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES; ALL STATE WORKFORCE LIAISONS

FROM: EMILY STOVER DeROCCO, Assistant Secretary

SUBJECT: Updated Table of Weights for Use in Calculating State-Level American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) Scores for the Participant, Employer and Job Seeker Customer Satisfaction Surveys

  1. Purpose. To provide states with the Program Year (PY 2004) ACSI Table of Weights.

  2. References. Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA), Section 136; WIA Final Rule 20 CFR Part 666; Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL No. 7-99 (“Core and Customer Satisfaction Performance Measures for the Workforce Investment System,” March 3, 2000); TEGL No. 8-99 (“Negotiating Performance Goals and Incentives and Sanctions Process under Title I of the Workforce Investment Act,” March 3, 2000); TEGL 6-00, Change 1 (“Changes to Guidance on Capturing Customer Satisfaction Results for Participants and Employers Receiving Services Under Title I of the Workforce Investment Act,” September 21, 2000); TEGL No. 12-00, Change 1 (“Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Performance Reporting System,” November 19, 2001); TEGL 1-02 (“Transmittal of ET Handbook No. 406: Reporting Instructions for ETA 9002 and VETS 200 Reports,” July 2, 2002); TEGL 7-02 (“Updated Table of Weights for Use in Calculating State-Level American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) Scores for the Participant, Employer and Job Seeker Customer Satisfaction Surveys,” October 4, 2002); and TEGL 14-03 (“Performance Reporting Submission Procedures for the Workforce Investment Act Standardized Record Data (WIASRD) and the Annual Report Under Title IB of the Workforce Investment Act,” November 13, 2003).

  3. Background. In the above referenced TEGL 6-00, the Department laid out guidelines on obtaining customer satisfaction results for participants and employers receiving services under Title I of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA).

With implementation of the new labor exchange performance measurement system in PY 2002, states began using the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) methodology to capture customer satisfaction outcomes for job seekers registered with the public labor exchange. This TEGL transmits the weights to be used for computing the ACSI scores for Title I participants, Wagner-Peyser Act registrants, employers, and other job seekers. Guidance on the conduct of customer satisfaction for the labor exchange performance measures can also be found in the ET Handbook No. 406.

  1. ACSI Table of Weights. Updated weights were calculated for use in PY 2004 by a statistical algorithm in order to minimize random survey variation or measurement errors that exist in all survey data. The weights listed in the attachment are to be used by a state in computing performance on the ACSI for employers, participants and job seekers registered with the public labor exchange for the quarterly reports and Annual Report covering the period of PY 2004.

  2. Reporting Job Seeker and Employer Scores on the 9002 C. TEGL 14-03 identified the time periods for reporting WIA employer and participant customer satisfaction. In keeping with that guidance, states will use the attached weights to calculate the ACSI customer satisfaction score for the employer and WIA participant populations. For job seekers served by the labor exchange, states will continue to report using the program year frame of reference. The chart below clarifies the time period and due date for reporting customer satisfaction outcomes for each of the three populations:

Performance Measure or Reporting Item Time period (Exit Cohort) to Be Used for PY 2004 Reporting
Participant Customer Satisfaction; Employer Customer Satisfaction The four quarters from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2004 (exit cohort to be reported on WIASRD due October 1, 2005)
Job Seeker Customer Satisfaction The four quarters from July 1, 2004, through June, 30, 2005 (PY 2004 registrants, to be reported in the quarter ending 6/30/2005)
  1. Action Required. States shall distribute this guidance to all officials within the state who need such information to implement Employment Service and WIA core customer satisfaction measures.

  2. Inquiries. Questions concerning this issuance may be directed to the appropriate Regional Office.

Attachments: ACSI Formula Weights for PY 2004

RESCISSIONS:
EXPIRATION DATE: Continuing

Attachment: ACSI Formula of Weights by State — PY 2004

State Overall Satisfaction Expectations Confirmation Compare to Ideal
AK 0.3859 0.3243 0.2898
AL 0.3909 0.3291 0.2800
AR 0.3749 0.3348 0.2903
AZ 0.3853 0.3274 0.2873
CA 0.3847 0.3281 0.2872
CO 0.3910 0.3244 0.2847
CT 0.4032 0.3197 0.2771
DC 0.4148 0.3264 0.2588
DE 0.3845 0.3259 0.2896
FL 0.3919 0.3253 0.2827
GA 0.3896 0.3270 0.2834
HI 0.3629 0.3318 0.3053
IA 0.3902 0.3221 0.2877
ID 0.3723 0.3254 0.3023
IL 0.3846 0.3294 0.2860
IN 0.3817 0.3366 0.2817
KS 0.3940 0.3304 0.2756
KY 0.3803 0.3304 0.2893
LA 0.3872 0.3288 0.2840
MA 0.3796 0.3356 0.2848
MD 0.3855 0.3264 0.2880
ME 0.3841 0.3255 0.2904
MI 0.3910 0.3199 0.2891
MN 0.3846 0.3455 0.2699
MO 0.3871 0.3491 0.2638
MS 0.3866 0.3227 0.2907
MT 0.3775 0.3378 0.2846
NC 0.3795 0.3251 0.2954
ND 0.3863 0.3302 0.2835
NE 0.3963 0.3210 0.2826
NH 0.3864 0.3377 0.2759
NJ 0.3817 0.3381 0.2802
NM 0.3822 0.3332 0.2846
NV 0.3887 0.3248 0.2865
NY 0.3906 0.3225 0.2870
OH 0.3769 0.3261 0.2970
OK 0.3888 0.3280 0.2831
OR 0.3721 0.3371 0.2908
PA 0.3904 0.3207 0.2888
RI 0.3804 0.3280 0.2915
SC 0.3909 0.3280 0.2811
SD 0.3876 0.3250 0.2874
TN 0.3836 0.3290 0.2874
TX 0.3931 0.3235 0.2834
UT 0.3987 0.3185 0.2828
VA 0.3879 0.3264 0.2857
VT 0.3859 0.3287 0.2855
WA 0.4008 0.3161 0.2832
WI 0.3580 0.3375 0.3045
WV 0.3745 0.3342 0.2913
WY 0.4013 0.3126 0.2861
Aggregate 0.3922 0.3644 0.3472

What does federal law require today?

This guidance has been rescinded. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace