Back to Federal guidance
Equitable tolling for TAA benefit deadlines
Summary ETA told state agencies that equitable tolling may be available for several Trade Adjustment Assistance deadlines, including training enrollment and applications for additional income support, job search and relocation allowances. It stressed timely notice to workers and attached questions and answers. ETA now lists the advisory Canceled.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
TEGL No. 08-11
Date issued
October 19, 2011
Status
Withdrawn
ETA lists this advisory Canceled as of 2026-10-24; the letter prints Expiration Date: Continuing and Rescissions: None.
Status last verified October 24, 2026
Is this still the rule?
This document has been withdrawn. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
Accessible letter PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2011/TEGL08-11acc.PDF
CLASSIFICATION
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION TAA
ADVISORY SYSTEM CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
OTAA
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DATE
Washington, D.C. 20210 October 19, 2011
ADVISORY: TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO. 8-11
TO: STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES
STATE WORKFORCE LIAISONS
ONE-STOP CENTER SYSTEM LEADS
STATE WORKFORCE ADMINISTRATORS
STATE AND LOCAL WORKFORCE BOARD CHAIRS AND
DIRECTORS
STATE LABOR COMMISSIONERS
FROM: JANE OATES /s/
Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT: Availability of Equitable Tolling of Deadlines for Workers Covered Under
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) Certifications
1. Purpose. This Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) informs states of the
Department of Labor’s (Department) interpretation of the Trade Act, applicable to workers
without regard to whether they were covered by certifications issued under the 2002
Amendments or the 2009 Amendments or any future law governing the TAA program,
allowing equitable tolling of the statutory and regulatory TAA deadlines for: 1) enrolling in
training as a condition of eligibility for Trade Readjustment Allowances (TRA) under section
231(a)(5)(A) of the Trade Act; 2) making a bona fide application to a training program as a
condition of eligibility for Additional TRA under section 233(b); and 3) applying for job
search allowances under section 237(a)(2)(C) and relocation allowances under section
238(a)(2)(E) and (c) of the Trade Act. In this context, this TEGL emphasizes to State
Workforce Agencies or agencies designated by Governors as “Cooperative State Agencies”
(CSAs) (also jointly referred to as “states”) the critical importance of their responsibility to
notify adversely affected workers that they are covered under a TAA certification and to
supply them with TAA benefit information that explains these deadlines.
2. References. Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (Pub. L. No. 93-618,
as amended) (Trade Act); Trade and Globalization Adjustment Assistance Act of 2009,
Division B, Title I, Subtitle I of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, (Pub.
L. No. 111-5) (2009 Amendments); Trade Adjustment Assistance Reform Act of 2002,
Division A, Title I, Subtitle A of the Trade Act of 2002 (Pub. L. No. 107-210) (2002
Amendments); 20 CFR Part 617; TEGL No. 22-08, Operating Instructions for Implementing
the Amendments to the Trade Act of 1974 Enacted by the Trade and Globalization
Adjustment Assistance Act of 2009; TEGL No. 11-02, Operating Instructions for
RESCISSIONS EXPIRATION DATE
None Continuing
Implementing the Amendments to the Trade Act of 1974 Enacted by the Trade Act of 2002,
and its Change 1.
3. Background. Section 617.4 of 20 CFR requires states to provide TAA benefit information
and assistance to workers, as provided under their agreements with the Secretary of Labor to
implement the TAA program. As provided in this regulation, states must provide:
A. Full information to workers about the benefit allowances, training, and other
TAA employment services, the petition and application procedures, and the
appropriate filing deadlines, for trade adjustment assistance allowances, training
and services; and
B. Whatever assistance is necessary to enable groups of workers, including
unorganized workers, to prepare applications for program benefits.
States must provide this notice and assistance to all workers in a group covered under any
TAA certifications, without regard to whether the certification is under the 2002 or 2009
Amendments or under any future law governing the TAA program. TEGL No. 11-02 and
TEGL No. 22-08 also provide that states, as agents of the Secretary, must notify certified
workers of potential Trade Act benefits and services, make eligibility determinations for
individuals, and deliver TAA benefits and services.
Section 617.50(d) of 20 CFR explains that state law provisions and regulations on good
cause for waiver of time limits, or for late filing of any claim, do not apply to TAA claims,
except as provided by 20 CFR Part 617. This regulation applies to workers seeking TRA or
TAA training under certifications issued under the 2002 Amendments, and also to workers
seeking job search and relocation allowances without regard to whether they were covered
under certifications issued under the 2002 or the 2009 Amendments or under any future law
governing the TAA program. Under section 234(b) of the Trade Act as amended by the 2009
Amendments, state laws and regulations on good cause for waiver of time limits or late filing
of claims apply to workers covered under certifications issued under the 2009 Amendments
with respect to an application for TRA or enrollment in training.
TEGL No. 11-02, Change 1 describes the deadline for enrollment in training as a condition
of TRA under section 231(a)(5)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974 (the “8/16 deadline”) under the
2002 Amendments, as follows:
“…either the last day of the 8th week after the week of issuance of the
certification of eligibility covering the worker or the last day of the 16th week
after the worker’s most recent total qualifying separation, whichever is later
(commonly referred to as the 8/16 week deadline).”
TEGL No. 11-02, Change 1 further explains that:
The “8/16 week deadline” for a worker will be reached while the worker is still
receiving unemployment insurance (UI). Some workers are not aware that this
deadline may apply before they exhaust their UI. The state is responsible for
informing workers of these requirements. The state must also assist such workers
in enrolling in an approved training program prior to the 8/16 week deadline, or
issue the workers waivers [under section 231(c)] prior to the 8/16 week deadline,
if appropriate.
Also, the regulation 20 CFR 617.15(b)(2), provides that:
Additional TRA requires that the individual make a bona fide application for
TAA training within 210 days from either the date of the certification or the most
recent TAA separation.
This regulation applies only to workers seeking TAA training under certifications issued
under the 2002 Amendments, because this 210-day deadline was repealed by the 2009
Amendments.
Also, the Trade Act contains additional filing deadlines for applying for job search
allowances (section 233(b) and relocation allowances (section 237(a)(2)(C)), that are
codified in the Department’s longstanding regulations at 20 CFR 617.31(c), and 20 CFR
617.41(c), respectively. These regulations apply to all workers in a group covered under any
TAA certifications, without regard to whether the certification is under the 2002 or 2009
Amendments or under any future law governing the TAA program.
4. Availability of Equitable Tolling.
A. What Is Equitable Tolling? Equitable tolling is a doctrine that permits the
suspension of statutory and administrative deadlines where equity demands; it is
not a statutory provision requiring a waiver of deadlines for “good cause”. Unlike
many statutory provisions allowing for “good cause” waiver of time limits, or for
late filing of any claim, equitable tolling of a deadline may only apply in
egregious circumstances where an individual acted with due diligence to meet
that deadline. Federal courts have found that this well-established doctrine may
provide relief with respect to TAA time limits, although no federal court has
applied this doctrine to the time limits addressed by this TEGL. For additional
information see Former Employees of Sonoco Products Co. v. Chao, 372 F.2d
1291, 1297-98 (Fed. Cir. 2004); Former Employees of Fisher & Company, Inc. v.
U.S. Department of Labor, 507 F. Supp. 2d 1321, 1328) (CIT 2007); Lady Kelly,
Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, 427 F. Supp. 1171, 1174-75 (CIT 2006).
However, in these TAA decisions, and generally, courts rarely find that equitable
tolling is appropriate.
B. When Should Equitable Tolling Apply? The Department has determined that
equitable tolling will be applied in situations where it would be manifestly unfair
to deny a worker TRA eligibility based on the worker’s failure to meet the
statutory deadline for enrolling in training, or to deny other TAA benefits such as
Additional TRA, job search allowances or relocation allowances, based on a
missed deadline. To apply equitable tolling in a particular situation, the state
must determine that, whether or not the Department or the state was at fault, the
worker exercised due diligence in meeting these TAA benefit eligibility
deadlines.
For example, equitable tolling may apply where a worker was not informed of the
8/16 deadline while receiving unemployment insurance and before the 8/16
deadline expired. Another situation where equitable tolling may be appropriate is
where the state did provide notice of TAA benefits and deadlines and where a
worker did everything necessary to enroll in training by the 8/16 deadline, but
was unable to do so because the state did not approve the training in time.
C. What Happens When A Deadline Is Equitably Tolled? When a deadline is
equitably tolled, the deadline to enroll in training, apply for Additional TRA, job
search allowances and relocation allowances is affected as follows:
i. Training: In the limited situations where a state finds that equitable tolling
of the 8/16 deadline is appropriate where the worker did not receive timely
notice, which meets the requirements of 20 CFR 617.4, and the worker
acted diligently to obtain TAA benefits when notice was eventually
provided, the deadline for enrollment in training will begin on the date the
worker knew or should have known of the 8/16 deadline and will end on
the last day of the 8th week (or the 56th day) following that date.
ii. Additional TRA: Likewise, the same action must be applied if the worker
did not receive timely notice, which meets the requirements of 20 CFR
617.4, that eligibility for Additional TRA requires a bona fide application
for TAA training as provided at 617.15(b)(2). Accordingly, the 210-day
period must be afforded to the individual from the date the worker knew
or should have known about the 210-day deadline.
iii. Job Search Allowances: The same action also must be applied in
situations covering job search allowances. The time limits would be tolled
if it is established that the worker did not receive timely notice, which
meets the requirements of 20 CFR 617.4, that under 617.31(c), an
application for job search allowances must be submitted before the 365th
day after the certification, or the individual’s last total separation, or as
applicable, the 182nd day after the completion of TAA training. If the
individual did not receive timely notice, which meets the requirements of
20 CFR 617.4, about the job search allowances, and if the individual did
not complete TAA training, the 365-day period will begin when the
individual knew or should have known about the deadline. If the
individual completed TAA training, the 182-day period will begin when
the individual knew or should have known about the deadline.
iv. Relocation Allowances: Similarly, the same action must be applied in
situations covering relocation allowances. The time limits would be tolled
if it is established that the worker did not receive timely notice, which
meets the requirements of 20 CFR 617.4, that under 617.41(c), an
application for relocation allowances must be submitted before the 425th
day after the certification, or the individual’s last total separation, or as
applicable, the 182nd day after the completion of TAA training. If the
individual did not receive timely notice, which meets the requirements of
20 CFR 617.4, about the relocation allowances, and if the individual did
not complete TAA training, the 425-day period will begin when the
individual knew or should have known of the deadline. If the individual
completed TAA training, the 182-day period will begin when the
individual knew or should have known about the deadline.
5. Instructions.
A. Application of Equitable Tolling to Pending and Future Claims. In order to apply
this interpretation concerning equitable tolling effective as soon as possible after
issuance of this TEGL, to all workers in a group covered under any TAA
certification, whether the certification is under the 2002 or 2009 Amendments or
any future law governing the TAA program, states are required to:
1. Inform all appropriate staff, including the appellate divisions of the state
agency, of the availability of equitable tolling to eligibility deadlines for
TAA benefits applicable to TAA claims or applications made by workers,
as described in this TEGL; and
2. Take appropriate action to apply equitable tolling in all determinations,
redeterminations, and appeals on TAA deadlines issued on or after the
date of this TEGL in accordance with 20 CFR 617.50(c) and 20 CFR
617.51.
B. Waiver of training requirement as a condition of TRA. As established by TEGL
No. 11-02, Change 1, waivers may only be issued before the expiration of the
applicable deadline for enrollment in training, not after it has expired. This
TEGL provides, however, that the deadlines may be extended for equitable
reasons. Accordingly, where the enrollment deadline has been extended, for
example, from April 1 to May 3, the worker, to qualify for TRA, must either be
enrolled in training by that date or have a waiver of the training requirement. A
state may not issue a waiver after May 3.
C. Extenuating Circumstances. The exception to the 8/16 deadline for “extenuating
circumstances” under section 231(a)(5)(A)(ii)(III) of the Trade Act, as explained
in TEGL No. 11-02, continues to apply. The availability of equitable tolling does
not preclude states from finding that extenuating circumstances justify a 45-day
extension of the enrollment period. States will apply the 45-day extension of the
enrollment period when appropriate to provide workers a longer period of time to
be eligible for TRA, enroll in training or obtain a waiver, as a first option – before
resorting to the application of equitable tolling.
6. Inquiries. Please direct all inquiries to the appropriate Regional Office.
7. Attachment.
Attachment 1: Availability of Equitable Tolling of Deadlines for Workers
Covered Under Trade Adjustment Assistance Certifications TEGL -
Questions and Answers
5
Attachment: Equitable Tolling Questions and Answers
Official attachment PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2011/TEGL08-11a1.PDF
Attachment 1
Availability of Equitable Tolling of Deadlines for Workers Covered Under
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) Certifications
Questions and Answers
1. What is this TEGL about?
This TEGL reminds states of the critical importance of their responsibility to notify
adversely affected workers that they are covered under a TAA certification and to
provide them with TAA benefit information that explains TAA deadlines.
It also announces that the Department of Labor (Department) recognizes that TAA
benefit deadlines may be equitably tolled for workers after those deadlines have passed.
2. What is equitable tolling?
Equitable tolling is a legal principle evolved from the common law of equity. The
principle of equitable tolling provides that the statute of limitations will not bar a claim
if the individual, despite reasonable care and diligent efforts, did not discover the injury
until after the limitations period had expired. Courts have the authority to provide
“equitable” remedies in situations where it would be unjust or unfair not to provide
relief to a party as appropriate. If the court applies the doctrine, the failure to meet the
deadline is excused and the individual will be allowed to proceed as if the time to meet
the deadline had not expired.
Generally, when the time to meet a deadline is “tolled”, it means that the time to meet
the deadline has been stopped. Tolling the time to meet a deadline provides additional
time to meet that deadline.
3. Why is the Department issuing this policy now?
The Trade and Globalization Adjustment Assistance Act of 2009 (TGAAA) provided
relief to workers who failed to meet deadlines for applying for Trade Readjustment
Allowances (TRA) for “good cause” as provided in state laws and regulations for
waiver of time limits or late filing of claims. These provisions expired in February
2011, and workers again were without statutory relief from strict TRA deadlines.
Thereafter, the Illinois State Supreme Court, issued an opinion in Williams v. Board of
Review, 2011 Westlaw 1049884 (Ill. March 24, 2011), applying the doctrine of
“equitable tolling” to toll the strict deadline for enrolling in training (that was in effect
before the TGAAA) because the worker, Ms. Williams, had not been notified by the
State of her certification or advised of TAA training and benefit enrollment deadlines as
required under 20 CFR Part 617.
In view of this decision and Federal court decisions applying this well-established
doctrine in cases involving different Trade Act provisions, the Department now
recognizes that equitable tolling may be available in situations where it would be
manifestly unfair to deny a worker TAA benefits based on a missed deadline.
Attachment 1
4. Does this TEGL apply to past determinations, or only to future decisions?
States are being instructed to take appropriate action to apply equitable tolling in all
determinations, redeterminations, and appeals on TAA deadlines issued on or after the
date of this TEGL in accordance with 20 CFR 617.50(c) and 20 CFR 617.51.
In particular, states are being asked to inform all appropriate staff, including the
appellate divisions of the state agency, of the availability of equitable tolling to
eligibility deadlines for TAA benefits applicable to TAA claims or applications made
by workers, as described in this TEGL.
5. What specific deadlines are addressed in this TEGL?
This TEGL describes how equitable tolling applies to TAA benefit deadlines; and
specifically identifies:
a) Deadline to enroll in training (Section 231(a)(5)(A) of the Trade Act)
b) Deadline to apply for Additional TRA (20 CFR 617.15(b)(2))
c) Deadline to apply for Job Search Allowances (20 CFR 617.31(c))
d) Deadline to apply for Job Relocation Allowances (20 CFR 617.41(c))
However, this list is not exclusive, and other TAA benefit deadlines may be equitably
tolled in appropriate cases.
2
What does federal law require today?
This guidance has been withdrawn. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace