Back to Federal guidance

Program Year 2002 ACSI survey weights

Summary ETA gave states updated weights for calculating Program Year 2002 customer satisfaction scores for employers, participants and job seekers. States were to use the attached state-by-state weights in quarterly and annual performance reports and distribute the guidance to relevant officials. ETA now labels the advisory Canceled.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
TEGL No. 7-02
Date issued
October 4, 2002
Status
Rescinded
ETA labels this advisory Canceled as of October 25, 2026. The letter printed an expiration date of Continuing.
Status last verified October 25, 2026

Is this still the rule?

This document has been rescinded. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.

This document has been rescinded
ETA labels this advisory Canceled as of October 25, 2026. The letter printed an expiration date of Continuing. It no longer reflects the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

Official HTML letter (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2002/TEGL7-02.html):

Employment and Training Administration Advisory System
U.S. Department of Labor
Washington, D.C. 20210
CLASSIFICATION: WIA/ASCI
CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL: OFAM
DATE: October 4, 2002

TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO. 7-02

TO: ALL STATE WORKFORCE LIAISONS
ALL STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES
ALL STATE WORKER ADJUSTMENT LIAISONS
ALL ONE-STOP CENTER SYSTEM LEADS

/S/
FROM: EMILY STOVER DeROCCO, Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT: Updated Table of Weights for Use in Calculating State-Level American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) Scores for the Participant, Employment and Job Seeker Customer Satisfaction Surveys

1. Purpose. To provide states with the Program Year (PY) 2002 ACSI Table of Weights.

2. References. Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA), section 136; WIA Final Rules, 20 CFR part 666; Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) No. 7-99; TEGL No. 8-99; TEGL No. 6-00, Change 1; TEGL No. 14-00, Change 1; and TEGL 1-02.

3. Background. In TEGL 6-00, Change 1, the Department provided the ACSI Table of Weights for PY 2001. TEGL No. 6-00 provided a description of the formulas for calculating the ACSI scores. Specific weighting factors were developed for each for PY 2002 and can be found attached to this TEGL. Guidance on the conduct of customer satisfaction surveys for the new labor exchange performance measures is found in ET Handbook No. 406, which was transmitted in TEGL No. 1-02.

4. ACSI Table of Weights. Updated weights were calculated for use in PY 2002 by a statistical algorithm in order to minimize random survey variation or measurement error that exists in all survey data. The weights listed in the attachment are to be used by each state in computing performance on the ACSI for employers, participants and job seekers registered with the public labor exchange, for the quarterly reports and Annual Report covering the period of PY 2002.

RESCISSIONS: [none listed]
EXPIRATION DATE: Continuing

5. Action Required. States shall distribute this guidance to all officials within the state who need such information to implement Employment Service and WIA core and customer satisfaction measures.

6. Inquiries. Questions concerning this issuance may be directed to the appropriate Regional Office.

7. Attachments. ACSI Formula Weights.

ACSI Formula Weights by State—PY 2002 (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2002/TEGL7-02_Attach.html):

State Overall Satisfaction Confirmation Ideal
AK 0.2344 0.6386 0.1270
AL 0.3936 0.3198 0.2866
AR 0.4003 0.3053 0.2944
AZ 0.3870 0.3140 0.2990
CA 0.3733 0.3233 0.3034
CO 0.3683 0.3290 0.3026
CT 0.3789 0.3285 0.2926
DC 0.3682 0.3402 0.2916
DE 0.3617 0.3328 0.3056
FL 0.3865 0.3191 0.2944
GA 0.3890 0.3153 0.2956
HI 0.3850 0.3208 0.2942
IA 0.3936 0.3067 0.2997
ID 0.3731 0.3460 0.2808
IL 0.3820 0.3211 0.2969
IN 0.3881 0.3203 0.2916
KS 0.3806 0.3349 0.2845
KY 0.3933 0.3221 0.2847
LA 0.3885 0.3159 0.2955
MA 0.3849 0.3236 0.2915
MD 0.3861 0.3254 0.2885
ME 0.3804 0.3280 0.2917
MI 0.3884 0.3205 0.2910
MN 0.3785 0.3231 0.2984
MO 0.3985 0.3197 0.2819
MS 0.3883 0.3293 0.2823
MT 0.3793 0.3270 0.2937
NC 0.4109 0.3120 0.2771
ND 0.3759 0.3189 0.3052
NE 0.3702 0.3332 0.2966
NH 0.3835 0.3325 0.2840
NJ 0.3882 0.3165 0.2953
NM 0.3795 0.3362 0.2843
NV 0.4186 0.2915 0.2899
NY 0.3727 0.3281 0.2991
OH 0.3754 0.3303 0.2943
OK 0.3955 0.3199 0.2846
OR 0.3861 0.3150 0.2989
PA 0.3831 0.3158 0.3012
RI 0.3961 0.3215 0.2824
SC 0.4055 0.3118 0.2827
SD 0.3736 0.3194 0.3070
TN 0.3911 0.3192 0.2897
TX 0.3857 0.3191 0.2952
UT 0.3796 0.3159 0.3044
VA 0.3955 0.3175 0.2870
VT 0.3746 0.3338 0.2916
WA 0.3786 0.3296 0.2918
WI 0.3765 0.3266 0.2969
WV 0.3930 0.3128 0.2942
WY 0.3762 0.3320 0.2917

What does federal law require today?

This guidance has been rescinded. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace