State conversion from penalty mail to commercial postage
Is this still the rule?
This document has been withdrawn. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.
Accessible letter PDF: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2006/TEGL04-06_508.pdf
CLASSIFICATION
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UI
ADVISORY SYSTEM
U. S. Department of Labor CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
Washington, D.C. 20210 OWS/DUIO
DATE
August 15, 2006
ADVISORY: TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO. 4-06
TO: STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES
STATE WORKFORCE LIAISONS
ONE STOP CENTER SYSTEM LEADS
FROM: EMILY STOVER DeROCCO /s/
Assistant Secretary
SUBJECT: Plans to Phase out Penalty Mail Costs for “Employment Security”
Programs and Availability of Supplemental Budget Funds for Conversion
to Commercial Mail Methods
1. Purpose. To inform state workforce agencies (SWAs) of the Employment and Training
Administration’s (ETA’s) intention to eliminate its authority to pay the U.S. Postal Service
(USPS) directly for “employment security” postage costs beginning Fiscal Year (FY) 2008.
These plans include the following:
• Phasing out ETA payment to the United States Postal Service (USPS) for state agency
penalty mail and postal management costs beginning in Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 for states
volunteering to be early implementers; beginning in FY 2008, all states will assume
responsibility for paying their own postage costs as well as any postal management
services currently provided to states through the Unemployment Insurance (UI)
Supplemental Budget Request (SBR) process;
• Implementing new procedures to fund UI, Foreign Labor Certification (FLC), Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA), and Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) postage
beginning with FY 2008;
• Implementing new procedures to fund Wagner-Peyser (WP) and Workforce Information
Grants (WIGs) beginning with Program Year (PY) 2008;
• Providing guidance on the payment of postage costs for programs conducted by SWAs in
cooperation with the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and Veterans Employment and
Training Service (VETS);
• Providing information on technical assistance available to states in converting from the
(penalty mail) Official Mail Accounting System (OMAS) to commercial mail to improve
general mail practices; and
• Soliciting UI SBRs from states for the purpose of implementing commercial mail
programs and improving postage management.
2. References. General Administration Letter No. 6-89, Employment Security Mail; 39 U.S.C.
3202(a) (1) (E); Section 3.3 of the USPS Domestic Mail Manual; State Unemployment
Insurance and Employment Service Operations Appropriations Language; Unemployment
Insurance Program Letter (UIPL) No. 15-04; and ET Handbook No. 336, 18th Edition, State
Quality Service Plan Planning and Reporting Guidelines.
3. Background. Under USPS requirements established in October 1993, states implemented
direct accountability methods (meters, stamps, and permit numbers) for postal management
systems that are in use today. This was the first time ETA had actual cost information for
state postage costs. This information, which is discussed in-depth in Attachment 1, showed
that postage costs vary widely among states.
In FYs 1998 and 1999, ETA established a federal/state postage workgroup to review states’
postage costs. The workgroup discussed various strategies and potential formulas for
allocating postage resources to states and queried states on their mailing practices and
postage costs. The results of the National Association of State Workforce Agencies
(NASWA)/ETA work group’s efforts informed this initiative.
4. Impetus for Change. Some states have been implementing new operating policies and
procedures that should reduce postage costs, such as use of debit cards for paying benefits
and direct deposit of benefits, electronic transmission of separation requests, Interactive
Voice Response Systems to process weekly claim certifications and provide claim
information, Internet tax registration, etc. As these new procedures are being planned and/or
implemented, states have requested that they be permitted to “reinvest” the resulting postage
savings in their program operations. While it is desirable to reward states that become more
efficient, the current arrangements for financing SWAs’ postage where the Department of
Labor (DOL) pays USPS directly for SWA postage costs have not allowed ETA to approve
these requests. In addition, the current arrangement does not provide states with financial
incentives to make improvements.
5. Changes Necessary to Convert from OMAS to Commercial Mail. In FY 1994, states
converted to direct mail accountability, which involved the installation of postage meters and
the use of permits, stamps, and Business Reply Mail (BRM). Therefore, the biggest change
involved in converting to commercial methods of payment is that, unlike the payment
method used under OMAS where DOL pays USPS directly for SWA postage costs, states
will need to ensure that funds are on deposit with the USPS for all payment methods
(permits, meters, BRM, etc.) prior to mailing.
States will need to make arrangements with their local postal representative or local postal
business service network and their meter manufacturer/vendor to initiate the following
changes:
a) Permit Mail – Typically, permit mail (G-12) is used for large mass mailings where the
content is the same. Currently, states have one G-12 mailing permit, and the fee is billed
through OMAS. States will need to submit an application to their local post office for a
state agency mailing permit and pay the permit fee. Funds must be on deposit prior to
mailing when using permit mail. There is a one-time permit fee of $160 per local
facility. There is an additional $160 annual mailing fee per site for those states that will
be using the First Class mail presorting programs to obtain postage discounts.
b) Business Reply Mail – Currently, states have one BRM permit, and the fee is billed
through OMAS. States will need to submit a BRM permit application for each mailing
site that a state agency wishes to receive BRM. Unlike the current BRM, funds must be
on deposit prior to mailing when using BRM permit mail. There is an annual BRM
permit and renewal fee of $160 per unique permit number. States can save money by
obtaining only one BRM permit and allowing all locations in the state to use the same
number. Additionally, each location using the BRM permit will pay postage plus a per
piece handling fee. Since the handling fee is determined on volume, states are
encouraged to consult with their local post office to select the best option.
c) Metered Mail – Most states currently use penalty meters and the postage costs are billed
through OMAS. When converting to commercial mail, states will need to contact their
meter vendor. The vendor will need to change the meter heads on the meter from OMAS
to commercial. The cost of conversion is dependent upon the vendor selected. In some
cases, meters may need to be replaced with digital meters to keep current with postal
requirements. Unlike penalty mail and the OMAS, funds must be on deposit prior to
mailing when using metered mail.
A more detailed explanation is provided in Guidelines for State Agencies to Convert
From “Official Mail Accounting System” (OMAS) To Commercial Payment
Systems for Postage, which may be found on the Office of Workforce Security’s
Web site at : www.ows.doleta.gov under “Quick Links” Postage Initiative.
6. New Postage Funding Arrangements.
A. Unemployment Insurance postage funding processes
• Base Allocation Process
The method for developing state specific target amounts for UI postage expenses uses
projected base weeks claimed and subject employer workloads to determine each state’s
share of total postage funds. This method is identical to the one used to generate the state
specific amounts withheld from the base allocations for Federal payments to the USPS
which have been attached for informational purposes only to previous years’ state UI
administrative planning targets.
• Above-Base Process
The determination of above-base postage funding will be based exclusively on weeks
claimed workload that was not included in the base allocation; subject employer activity
is funded 100 percent in base. The regular UI base weeks claimed workload issued with
the state UI administrative planning targets is a fiscal year total that must be converted to
a quarterly equivalent base weeks claimed. The quarterly regular UI base weeks claimed
will be subtracted from the actual regular UI weeks claimed as reported on the UI-3, and
any weeks claimed in excess of the base weeks claimed will be considered above base
workload. Trade and additional benefits weeks claimed will be added to regular UI
above base weeks, and the resulting total will be multiplied by a unit cost (estimated to
be 23 cents in FY 2007) for postage. The product will be the postage above base
funding.
B. Wagner-Peyser postage funding process
ETA will provide $18 million that has been withheld from the WP national appropriation for
postage costs directly to the states. The distribution will be based on each state's share of the
total WP appropriation according to the statutory formula allocation. This methodology is
identical to the one used to generate the state specific amounts for Federal payments to the
USPS in the past.
C. Bureau of Labor Statistics Cooperative Agreements funding process
BLS will provide postage funding to SWAs directly. BLS will inform SWAs of the process
it will use separately.
D. Jobs for Veterans’ State Grants funding process
VETS will provide the $1.5 million, previously transferred to ETA for postage, directly to
the states based upon each state’s share of the total Jobs for Veterans’ State Grant formula
funding. A state’s postage allocation will consist of approximately one percent of its
statutory formula allocation, and VETS will inform State Workforce Agencies of the
allocation process in a Veterans’ Program Letter (VPL).
E. Miscellaneous ETA Workforce Grants and Programs
The FLC, TAA, WIG, and WOTC programs have been assessed a percentage of their
national appropriation for postage costs. In PY 2006/FY 2006, the percentage was 2.9
percent or $2.0 million. Upon converting to commercial mail, these programs will no longer
be assessed for postage, and the funds will be included in state grants.
7. Postal Supplemental Budget Request Process. The postal SBR process used to reimburse
states for their use of vendors to bundle their UI mail to obtain discounts will be eliminated
in FY 2007 for early implementers and in FY 2008 for all other states, and states will be
expected to pay these costs out of their annual postage allocation.
8. Technical Assistance. All states should begin consulting with their local post office, which
can provide assistance on contacting local postal representatives or their local postal business
service network. These USPS representatives can provide technical assistance on what
permit application forms to fill out and how to achieve the maximum postage discounts.
States should also consult with their local meter manufacturer vendor who can guide them
through the meter conversion process.
States are encouraged to utilize www.USPS.com to find additional resources and guides to
improve mail management programs. Additionally, the National Postal Forum is a national
event that provides opportunities for state mail managers to attend seminars and workshops
on the latest innovations in mail management. The Forum provides the opportunity for state
mail managers to obtain information on operating efficient mail operations and to obtain
information from experts and their colleagues in other states. Information regarding
registration costs, dates, etc., can be found on www.USPS.com.
9. Early Implementers. ETA encourages states to assume responsibility for their postage and
mail management costs beginning as early as October 1, 2006, on a voluntary basis. In doing
so, the state agrees to convert to commercial mail prior to the conversion date. ETA will no
longer reimburse USPS for early implementing states’ FY 2007 penalty mail costs thereafter,
and if USPS presents a postage bill on behalf of the state account, the amount billed will be
recouped from the state.
States may opt to convert effective at the beginning of a quarter. In a case where a state
converts after the first quarter of FY 2007, its UI postage allocation will be adjusted
according to its historical weeks claimed pattern, and its WP, FLC, TAA, WIG, and WOTC
postage allocation will be 25 percent for each quarter remaining in the year.
BLS and VETS will provide instructions to states on how BLS cooperative agreements and
VETS funded programs will be provided postage funds.
A state that wishes to implement before FY 2008 should notify Dale Ziegler, Deputy
Administrator, Office of Workforce Security, 200 Constitution Ave. N.W., Room S-4231,
Washington, D.C. 20210, indicating its intention to implement early and provide the date it
will make the conversion. Questions may be directed to Mr. Ziegler at 202-693-2942 or
[email protected].
10. Timeline.
• ETA will provide all states with UI, FLC, TAA, WOTC postage allocations and cease
paying the USPS for state UI postage costs, including VETS, beginning October 1, 2007,
at which time states will pay the USPS directly.
• To accommodate FY implementation, ETA will provide all states with partial WP and
WIG postage allocations in PY 2007 (covering 9 months beginning October 2007) and
cease paying the USPS for state WP and WIG postage beginning October 2007, at which
time states will pay the USPS directly. Full WP and WIG postage allocations will be
provided beginning in PY 2008.
• States wishing to be early implementers may convert to commercial mail beginning
October 1, 2006, and ETA will provide participating states with a postage allocation as
described above. BLS and VETS will provide information for early implementers
separately.
11. Proper Use of Postage Resources. State administrators should refer to General
Administration Letter No. 6-89 for information on the proper use of postage funds.
12. UI Supplemental Budget Requests for FY 2006. Up to $50,000 per state is available in FY
2006 for use by states to make the changes noted in item #5 above to convert to commercial
mail during FY 2007. These funds are also available to assess UI mailing operations,
explore opportunities and available technologies to improve efficiency and reduce mailing
costs, and install or modify systems or equipment to decrease mailing expenditures. See
Attachment II for UI SBR instructions. SBRs are due to the National Office no later than
September 15, 2006.
13. Action Required. State administrators and liaisons are requested to distribute this advisory
to appropriate staff.
14. Inquiries. State administrators should contact their ETA regional office and DVET/VETS
Regional Administrators as appropriate.
15. Attachments.
Attachment I - Penalty Mail Fact Sheet
Attachment II - Outline for FY 2006 Supplemental Budget Request for Penalty Mail
Conversion and Postal Management Improvements
Attachment III - FY 2007 Preliminary Postage Allocations
Attachment IV – 3-Year Analysis – Average UI Work Load/Postage Costs
Attachment: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2006/TEGL04-06_Att1.pdf
Attachment I
PENALTY MAIL
FACT SHEET
Penalty mail allows for reimbursement of states’ postage costs “after the fact,” which the
Department of Labor (DOL) pays directly to the United States Postal Service (USPS). The
authorized users include the following programs/organizations:
Unemployment Insurance (UI), Wagner-Peyser (WP), Foreign Labor Certification (FLC),
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA), Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
Cooperative Agreement, Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), Work Opportunity Tax
Credit (WOTC), and the Disabled Veterans’ Outreach and Local Veterans Employment
programs (Veterans Programs).
The legal authority to use penalty mail is found at 39 U.S.C. 3202(a)(1)(E):
“[T]he United States Employment Service and the system of employment offices
operated by it in conformity with the provisions of sections 49-49c, 49d, 49e-49k of Title
29 [Wagner-Peyser Act], and all state employment systems which receive funds
appropriated under authority of these sections” are authorized to use penalty mail.
Section 3.3 of the USPS Domestic Mail Manual interprets the penalty authority privilege granted
to the “United States Employment Service” in 39 U.S.C. as encompassing “Employment
Security Offices,” which provides the authority to other DOL users and functions, e.g., UI – All
mail prepared under 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, and 11.0 (sections in the manual) by state employment security
offices is accepted without prepayment of postage and fees.
Additionally, the appropriations act provides DOL with the authority to pay the USPS directly
for state postage costs. Since states do not pay their postage directly, their individual postage
costs are essentially invisible. Thus, there is little incentive for states to aggressively manage
their costs.
How the Current System Works
• DOL subtracts funds from state UI administration, WP, Foreign Labor Certification
(FLC), Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), Workforce Information Grants (WIG),
Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) appropriations to cover state postage costs before
annual allocations are provided to the states. These funds are held by ETA, which pays
monthly postage charges to the USPS for the states’ employment security postage.
• ETA bills BLS for actual costs, and charges Veterans’ programs an estimated amount.
• A few states use vendors to bundle their mail to obtain discounts and are reimbursed for
their postage costs through supplemental budget requests.
States’ Postage Experience
Actual postage costs vary from state to state and are primarily influenced by UI claim workloads,
WP usage, and state efficiency. Historically, postage costs have been approximately 4-5 percent
of the appropriations, but vary depending upon the state of the economy. In the case of UI,
recent postage costs have ranged from $76 million in FY 2000 to $142 million in FY 2004.
Little information is available on actual WP, FLC, TAA, WIG, and WOTC postage costs; the
USPS does not collect program specific information, and the ETA Office of Financial and
Administrative Management (OFAM) has charged these programs approximately $20 million
per year over the past five years for postage costs based upon estimation.
ETA reviewed UI postage expenditures for FY 2003, FY 2004 and FY 2005 (Attachment V)
using Weeks Claimed and 4 times Subject Employers as a proxy for workload to assess state
postal expenses and expressed the result as a postal workload index (PWI). The review revealed
that in FY 2005 the average PWI was 0.62 and the median 0.66, ranging from a low of 0.42 to a
high of 1.69. In FY 2003, the median was 0.70 and the range was 0.46 to 1.63. The wide range
results from differing state practices in postal management, including the use of available
discounts to reduce overall costs.
On several occasions, ETA has encouraged improvements in state postage handling with varying
degrees of success. In FY 2005, ETA provided a $50,000 SBR opportunity for states to study
and examine mailing operations, explore opportunities to improve efficiency and reduce mailing
costs and to implement available technology to decrease state mailing expenditures in
anticipation of this change; only 30 states requested funds. Previously, in FY 1992, ETA
provided funding ($11.5 million) for states to purchase postal equipment to improve efficiencies
and reduce costs; as a result, many states now participate in complicated postal discount rate
programs (e.g., presorting, bar-coding etc.) and have reduced their postage costs. For example, a
39 cent letter can be mailed at the automated presorted three digit rate of 30.8 cents per piece or
a 21 percent cost saving. Today, some states continue to use mail discount programs. A few
states even use commercial mail practices wherein ETA pays the costs through SBRs.
Attachment: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2006/TEGL04-06_Att2.pdf
Attachment II
OUTLINE FOR FY 2006 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET REQUEST FOR PENALTY
MAIL CONVERSION AND POSTAL MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS
Up to $50,000 per state is available in FY 2006 unemployment insurance (UI) funds for use by
states to pay for the costs of converting to commercial mail and to improve efficiency and
reduce mailing costs, and install or modify systems or equipment to decrease mailing
expenditures.
Description of the Project:
Provide a brief description of the proposed use of the SBR funds converting from OMAS to
commercial mail and/or making improvements to the state’s UI postal management system. The
description should explain the activities that the SWA will undertake and should substantiate the
proposed project costs.
Instructions: Refer to Handbook No. 336 for instructions in completing supplemental budget
requests.
Costs:
Cost expenditures must match those on the SF 424A. Provide brief explanations of the cost
breakouts for staff, equipment, other expenditures, etc., for each project and sub-project.
Hardware, Software, Telecommunications Equipment, Contracted Services
Item Number Requested Cost Per Item Total Cost
____________________________________________________
Staff (This format is used for SWA staff and/or for contract staff)
Position Title # Hours Cost Per Hour Total
____________________________________________________
Identify other expenditures and include cost estimates.
_____________________________________________________
State Contact: Provide name, telephone number and email address of the individual who can
answer any questions relating to this proposal.
Amount of Funding Request for this Project: SBR funds may be used for one-time costs
only and may not be used for ongoing costs, such as maintenance of software and
hardware, or ongoing communications costs.
Staff costs are allowable only for staff not previously funded by the state's base grant.
Costs for training and related travel expenses are allowable for base staff but salaries and
benefits are not allowable for base staff attending training unless the state incurs
additional expenses such as backfilling the staff position during the time that the
employee attends training. Above base AS&T and NPS staff year costs must be based on
the state PS and PB rate approved for the current year's UI grant.
Examples of how SBR funds may be used include the following:
• Converting OMAS meters to commercial meters, and payment of Permit Mail and
Business Reply Mail (BRM) fees (see #5 in TEGL 4-06).
• Conducting a cost-benefit analysis of using contract services that will allow states to
take advantage of presorting and automation discounts offered by the Postal Service
to reduce postage costs.
• Replacing/updating mailing equipment to improve efficiency and reduce costs (for
states that manage their own mail operation).
• Assessing current mailing processes to identify areas where additional efficiencies
may be derived, including reviewing what is mailed and to whom it is being mailed,
and, where applicable, reducing unnecessary redundancies in mailing.
• Modifying benefit or tax systems to ensure the most efficient print streams are used.
Any funds that are not used for automation acquisition expenditures must be obligated by
December 31, 2006, and liquidated within 90 days of that date. Funds used for automation
acquisition expenditures are available for obligation through September 30, 2008, and
liquidated within 90 days of that date.
Due Date: SBR proposals must be received in the national office no later than September 15, 2006.
Send these SBRs and the required documents to the attention of: U. S. Department of
Labor, Office of Workforce Security, ATTN: Jagruti Patel, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW,
Room S-4231, Washington, D.C. 20210. A copy should be provided to the appropriate
Regional Administrator. The state should ensure that the following is provided:
• Original and two copies of each SBR proposal with supporting documentation.
• Completed forms SF 424 (revised 10-2005), 424a and 424b as required in ET
Handbook 336, 18th Edition.
Attachment: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2006/TEGL04-06_Att3.pdf
Attachment III
FY 2007 Preliminary Postage Allocations
FY 2007
FY 2007 UI Estimated PY 2006 Wagner- FY 2007/PY 2006
Base Postage Above Base Peyser Postage Total Postage FY 2005 Actual
Allocation Earnings (1) Allocation Allocation (2) Postage Paid (3)
Total 103,513,037 4,585,000 18,000,000 126,098,037 123,741,514
Alabama 1,051,374 44,515 245,492 1,341,381 1,223,680
Alaska 508,335 25,488 195,669 729,492 590,861
Arizona 1,206,372 48,822 306,939 1,562,133 1,407,640
Arkansas 1,001,662 45,647 148,567 1,195,876 1,465,289
California 15,694,789 696,536 2,076,603 18,467,928 12,782,756
Colorado 1,235,365 44,797 282,169 1,562,331 2,145,948
Connecticut 1,431,172 64,090 198,486 1,693,748 1,622,107
Delaware 309,616 13,078 50,277 372,971 298,598
District of Columbia 302,595 12,364 71,335 386,294 374,149
Florida 4,230,359 159,197 891,781 5,281,337 4,742,672
Georgia 2,241,778 91,347 513,140 2,846,265 2,237,976
Hawaii 325,380 13,239 68,288 406,907 508,881
Idaho 547,135 22,947 163,027 733,109 645,839
Illinois 4,855,959 223,886 756,896 5,836,741 5,312,806
Indiana 1,912,423 86,229 362,249 2,360,901 3,032,186
Iowa 928,605 40,564 177,281 1,146,450 972,909
Kansas 751,621 30,722 163,467 945,810 1,257,803
Kentucky 1,236,986 55,384 235,037 1,527,407 1,183,508
Louisiana 1,118,746 46,952 259,444 1,425,142 1,838,112
Maine 444,783 18,202 96,950 559,935 752,079
Maryland 1,476,676 59,902 312,253 1,848,831 2,112,243
Massachusetts 2,939,014 134,061 378,379 3,451,454 3,846,220
Michigan 4,410,183 210,824 623,680 5,244,687 6,210,767
Minnesota 1,962,294 88,133 311,264 2,361,691 2,340,818
Mississippi 732,948 32,092 175,387 940,427 1,083,003
Missouri 1,924,576 85,256 342,172 2,352,004 2,561,113
Montana 350,507 13,824 133,226 497,557 515,808
Nebraska 538,729 22,522 160,112 721,363 789,960
Nevada 796,456 35,425 125,929 957,810 852,994
New Hampshire 301,724 10,441 74,288 386,453 387,935
New Jersey 4,309,181 198,345 486,859 4,994,385 4,326,782
New Mexico 465,520 19,050 149,503 634,073 660,358
New York 7,569,202 344,073 1,079,169 8,992,444 8,358,530
North Carolina 2,687,378 119,568 492,338 3,299,284 3,073,079
North Dakota 180,284 6,938 135,664 322,886 271,255
Ohio 3,644,742 165,684 687,745 4,498,171 5,317,368
Oklahoma 786,818 31,404 186,664 1,004,886 1,084,818
Oregon 1,608,003 72,356 231,181 1,911,540 2,549,486
Pennsylvania 6,462,652 313,603 705,868 7,482,123 6,818,470
Puerto Rico 1,586,699 78,853 224,046 1,889,598 1,088,619
Rhode Island 462,285 20,386 62,789 545,460 555,163
South Carolina 1,339,961 59,219 255,641 1,654,821 1,753,409
South Dakota 160,944 5,124 125,385 291,453 333,881
Tennessee 1,586,579 70,680 331,584 1,988,843 2,162,310
Texas 5,198,921 223,386 1,277,588 6,699,895 6,306,769
Utah 525,266 19,083 214,845 759,194 1,639,737
Vermont 273,325 11,774 58,737 343,836 393,419
Virgin Islands 30,508 975 35,455 66,938 42,044
Virginia 1,605,801 60,835 389,282 2,055,918 2,097,982
Washington 2,739,750 121,170 383,228 3,244,148 4,605,508
West Virginia 562,209 25,405 143,515 731,129 874,601
Wisconsin 2,800,535 135,077 337,421 3,273,033 4,041,989
Wyoming 158,312 5,526 97,280 261,118 289,275
Guam 0 0 8,423 8,423 0
(1) Above base postage is estimated based on FY 2007 President’s budget assumptions. Above base
weeks claimed were assumed to be realized in the same proportion as base weeks claimed.
(2) Does not include $2.0 million for FLC, WIG, and WOTC.
(3) Adjusted for amount paid by VETS
Attachment: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/advisories/TEGL/2006/TEGL04-06_Att4.pdf
Attachment IV
3-Year Analysis – Average UI Work Load/Postage Costs
Subject Employers Base & Above Total Work Actual UI Postage Postage/Workload
X4 Weeks Claimed Items Paid (1) Index (PWI)I
Total 27,937,323 163,965,394 191,902,717 122,507,213 0.64
Alaska 66,344 896,399 962,743 386,426 0.40
California 4,055,272 25,197,132 29,252,404 13,677,523 0.47
Delaware 104,815 498,475 603,290 284,008 0.47
Illinois 1,121,289 8,699,369 9,820,659 4,680,539 0.48
Georgia 801,260 3,204,815 4,006,075 1,949,075 0.49
New Jersey 1,134,029 6,902,186 8,036,215 4,063,996 0.51
Kentucky 355,167 1,851,924 2,207,091 1,122,794 0.51
Rhode Island 133,544 761,399 894,943 472,163 0.53
Iowa 275,477 1,446,363 1,721,840 908,708 0.53
Idaho 163,055 828,806 991,861 564,342 0.57
Arizona 442,264 2,004,173 2,446,437 1,417,469 0.58
Texas 1,584,640 8,585,585 10,170,225 5,979,737 0.59
Nevada 195,141 1,198,353 1,393,494 831,233 0.60
Montana 126,761 444,473 571,234 344,338 0.60
Florida 1,665,620 5,506,664 7,172,284 4,335,134 0.60
New Mexico 169,788 713,244 883,032 534,118 0.60
Pennsylvania 1,084,319 10,318,167 11,402,485 6,987,478 0.61
North Dakota 74,633 204,399 279,032 171,851 0.62
New York 1,903,211 11,656,664 13,559,875 8,376,578 0.62
Alabama 345,828 1,715,347 2,061,175 1,291,814 0.63
New Hampshire 156,955 411,340 568,294 356,807 0.63
Louisiana 381,189 1,859,379 2,240,568 1,436,977 0.64
North Carolina 722,699 4,900,338 5,623,037 3,613,846 0.64
Minnesota 532,800 2,896,577 3,429,377 2,207,943 0.64
South Carolina 359,837 2,237,927 2,597,764 1,752,000 0.67
Michigan 859,713 7,777,429 8,637,142 5,924,568 0.69
Virginia 676,448 2,282,042 2,958,490 2,031,124 0.69
Oklahoma 301,555 1,198,496 1,500,051 1,031,974 0.69
Nebraska 181,493 731,274 912,767 631,153 0.69
Indiana 502,599 3,067,829 3,570,428 2,484,234 0.70
Missouri 522,380 3,260,932 3,783,312 2,651,006 0.70
Kansas 271,271 1,412,751 1,684,022 1,181,975 0.70
Tennessee 440,405 2,661,377 3,101,783 2,272,728 0.73
Massachusetts 700,909 5,308,642 6,009,551 4,436,854 0.74
Wyoming 78,417 196,996 275,414 204,528 0.74
Mississippi 216,189 1,192,701 1,408,891 1,046,631 0.74
Connecticut 387,411 2,572,449 2,959,860 2,262,254 0.76
Ohio 933,657 6,070,788 7,004,445 5,448,172 0.78
South Dakota 92,076 175,152 267,228 211,225 0.79
Arkansas 244,389 1,661,437 1,905,826 1,514,284 0.79
Maryland 538,829 2,104,189 2,643,018 2,121,206 0.80
Oregon 405,551 3,348,382 3,753,933 3,111,122 0.83
Hawaii 116,061 470,067 586,129 496,920 0.85
Maine 158,467 619,716 778,183 670,312 0.86
Vermont 84,161 403,675 487,837 420,219 0.86
Colorado 577,085 1,811,146 2,388,231 2,079,934 0.87
West Virginia 150,915 829,332 980,247 909,869 0.93
Wisconsin 492,273 4,290,065 4,782,338 4,449,888 0.93
Washington 822,569 4,791,216 5,613,786 5,452,896 0.97
Utah 226,560 787,811 1,014,371 1,715,240 1.69
Note: DC, PR and VI not included due to incomplete data
(1) Does not include WP, VETS, Trade or BLS postage paid
What does federal law require today?
This guidance has been withdrawn. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace