Reporting JTPA Title II-A and II-C performance status
Is this still the rule?
This document has been rescinded. Ezel checks what federal law requires today, under current federal labor law, and answers your situation with citations.
Training and Employment Guidance Letter No. 02-95
TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO. 02-95
TO: ALL STATE JTPA LIAISONS; ALL STATE WAGNER-PEYSER ADMINISTERING AGENCIES; ALL STATE WORKER ADJUSTMENT LIAISONS
FROM: BARBARA ANN FARMER, Administrator for Regional Management
SUBJECT: Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) Titles II-A and II-C Performance Status Summary
Rescissions: None. Expiration date: Continuing.
-
Purpose. To provide guidance on reporting of program performance
status for JTPA Titles II-A and II-C, as amended. -
References. TEGL 1-94, dated August 31, 1994; 20 CFR Part
627.470; also the "Guide to JTPA Performance Standards for Program
Years 1994 and 1995" transmitted by Training and Employment
Information Notice 16-94, dated December 13, 1994. -
Background. Within 90 days after the end of the Program Year
[JTPA §106(j)], each State is required to report to the Secretary
the final performance standards and actual performance of each
Service Delivery Area (SDA) within the State.Within the same timeframe, the State shall also provide to the
Secretary technical assistance plans for each SDA that has failed
the established performance standards for one program year, and a
reorganization plan for each SDA that has failed performance
standards for two consecutive program years. -
Policy. Effective Program Year (PY) 1994, the Governor's
determination of an SDA's failure to meet performance standards, and
the consequent imposition of technical assistance and reorganization
plans, must incorporate the Secretary's parameters, including the
new definition of failure to meet performance standards (see TEGL
1-94).The Secretary's definition of failure to meet performance standards
is not retroactive to PY 1993, unless similar provisions were
included in the Governor's performance standards policy for PY 1993.
For Program Years 1993 and 1994 only, the Governor's policy shall be
used to determine SDAs that are subject to sanctions due to failure
to meet performance standards for 2 consecutive years.Further, Governors are encouraged to take into consideration program
funding uncertainties and other budgetary constraints in their
review of SDA performance results and development of performance
standards. In particular, we encourage Governors to review
performance standards for youth programs, given rescissions and
continuing uncertainty of youth program funding. Governors are
reminded that adjustments to performance levels are allowable should
changes occur in the levels of funding, the local economy, or needs
in service to special populations. -
Policy Transition and Implementation.
-
PY 1993: The Governor's definition for failure to meet the
standards applies to this Program Year. Technical assistance or
reorganization plans required by the Secretary do not apply to
this Program Year. -
PY 1994: First year application of the Secretary's definition
for "failure to meet performance standards" applies. Only
technical assistance plans are required from the State for SDAs
that failed to meet performance standards for PY 1994.SDAs that failed in PY 1993 according to the Governor's
definition of failure to meet performance standards but did not
fail according to the Governor's definition in PY 1994 cannot be
sanctioned.Required submissions for PY 1994 within 90 days after the end of
the Program Year are:-
final performance standards and actual performance for each
SDA; and -
technical assistance plans for each SDA that failed to meet
performance standards for PY 1994
-
-
PY 1995: Second year application of the Secretary's definition
for "failure to meet performance standards" applies. As this is
the second year of application, States must also develop and
impose reorganization plans for SDAs that failed to meet the
performance standards for two consecutive years (PY 1994 and PY
1995).Required submissions for PY 1995 within 90 days after the end of
the Program Year are:-
final performance standards and actual performance for each
SDA; and -
technical assistance plans for each SDA that failed to meet
performance standards for the first year (PY 1995); and -
reorganization plans for each SDA that failed to meet
established performance standards for two consecutive years
(PY 1994 and PY 1995)
-
-
-
Performance Standards Calculation and Reporting.
The standard for each core measure shall be the end-of-year
recalculated standard and shall reflect the adjustments to the
national departure point, including model adjustments and any
additional Governor's adjustments. Actual performance shall be
calculated according to the procedures described in Attachment 1 to
TEGL 1-94A "Performance Status Summary Sheet" is attached as a suggested
reporting format, however, any format that provides the required
information is acceptable. Note that the Title II-A adult and
welfare follow-up standards will continue to be based on data for
individuals who terminate during the first three quarters of the
Program Year and the last quarter of the previous Program Year. -
Technical Assistance Plans. Governors are required to provide to
the Secretary technical assistance plans for SDAs that failed to
meet performance standards for the first Program Year. Technical
assistance plans shall describe:-
analyses done to determine causes of failure;
-
steps taken (or to be taken) to correct problems;
-
a plan for tracking corrective action taken and technical assistance provided to the SDA
-
-
Reorganization Plans. Governors are required to provide to the
Secretary reorganization plans for SDAs that failed to meet
performance standards for two consecutive Program Years. The
reorganization plan shall:-
be communicated directly to the SDA;
-
specifically identify the persisting problem/deficiency;
-
provide to the SDA an initial statement of the specific
steps/corrective actions required; -
include a timeframe for the implementation of the reorganization
plan; and -
be confirmed by a final statement from the Governor not later
than October 30 after the end of the relevant Program Year
(October 30, 1996, for PY 1994 and 1995)
-
-
Action Required. For PY 1994, States shall submit the
performance status summary and technical assistance plans to the ETA
Regional Administrator in the appropriate DOL Regional Office no
later than September 30, 1995. Thereafter, a copy of each required
performance status summary, technical assistance plan and
reorganization plan shall be submitted to the ETA Regional
Administrator by September 30 after the end of the Program Year.Beginning with PY 1995, additional information to confirm the
imposition of a reorganization plan is to be submitted by October 30
after the end of the Program Year to the ETA Regional Administrator.
States may use any format that provides all of the information
described above in sections 6, 7, and 8.This Guidance Letter should be distributed to all officials within
the State involved in implementing JTPA Titles II-A and II-C
performance standards policy. -
Inquiries. Questions concerning the performance standards
information and the attachment should be directed to Regional Office
Performance Standards Coordinators or Valerie Lloyd on (202)
219-5487, extension 115. Questions regarding technical assistance
and reorganization policy may be directed to Jim Aaron on (202)
219-6825. -
Attachment. Performance Status Summary Sheet.
Attachment: Performance Status Summary Sheet
JTPA Titles II-A and II-C — PERFORMANCE STATUS SUMMARY SHEET*
Program Year: ______ (Per instructions in TEGL 1-94, provide data for adult and welfare followup measures for the previous Program Year's fourth quarter plus the first three quarters of the reference year.)
State: __
SDA Name: _
SDA 5-Digit Number: ___
| Measure | Performance standard | Actual performance |
|---|---|---|
| Adult Followup Employment Rate¹ | ______ | ______ |
| Adult Followup Weekly Earnings² | ______ | ______ |
| Welfare Followup Employment Rate¹ | ______ | ______ |
| Welfare Followup Weekly Earnings² | ______ | ______ |
| Youth Entered Employment Rate¹ | ______ | ______ |
| Youth Employability Enhancement Rate¹ | ______ | ______ |
| Technical Assistance Plan Required? | — | Yes/No³ |
| Reorganization Plan Required? | — | Yes/No³ |
¹ Round to nearest 0.1%.
² Round to nearest $.
³ If a Technical Assistance or Reorganization Plan is required, attach it to this report or submit it separately to the ETA Regional Administrator in the applicable DOL regional office by September 30 following the end of the Program Year.
- Use of this format is optional. Reports prepared by States may be formatted in any way the State prefers, so long as all required information is provided.
Source: ETA's scanned attachment, transcribed from its page image.
What does federal law require today?
This guidance has been rescinded. Ezel checks current federal labor law as it stands now and answers your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace