Back to Federal guidance

Updated disadvantaged youth and adult data for WIOA allocations

Summary ETA tells states to use updated disadvantaged youth and adult data in their WIOA Youth and Adult within-state allocation formulas beginning with program year 2023. It explains where the data comes from and how to apply it to local area allocations. The letter replaces TEGL 14-17.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
Document number
TEGL No. 01-23
Date issued
July 31, 2023
Status
Active
ETA lists this advisory as active. It prints an expiration date of Continuing and expressly rescinds TEGL 14-17.
Status last verified October 24, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
CLASSIFICATION
   EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION                   WIOA
               ADVISORY SYSTEM                              CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL
          U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR                          OWI-DASG
             Washington, D.C. 20210                         DATE
                                                            July 31, 2023

ADVISORY:        TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO. 01-23

TO:              STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES

FROM:            BRENT PARTON
                 Acting Assistant Secretary

SUBJECT:         Updated Disadvantaged Youth and Adult Data for use in Program Year (PY)
                 2023 and future Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Youth and
                 Adult Within-State Allocation Formulas

1. Purpose. This guidance 1) advises states of the availability of disadvantaged Youth and
   Adult data for use in the WIOA Youth and Adult within-state allocation formulas and, 2)
   requests that states use this data in their PY 2023 and future within-state allocation formulas.

2. Action Requested. States must use the updated disadvantaged Youth and Adult data in their
   PY 2023 and future PYs for within-state allocation formulas.

3. Summary and Background.

   a. Summary – The statutory formulas to allocate WIOA Youth and Adult funds among and
      within states requires the use of Disadvantaged Youth and Adults data factors.

   b. Background – On a periodic basis, the Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
      notifies states of the availability of updated special tabulations of disadvantaged Youth
      and Adult data from the American Community Survey (ACS) for use in determining state
      allotment and within-state allocations starting in PY 2023. This guidance replaces TEGL
      14-17.

4. Availability of Disadvantaged Youth and Adult Data. ETA posts the updated
   disadvantaged Youth and Adult data on the ETA Budget website at the following link:
   http://www.doleta.gov/budget/disadvantagedYouthAdults.cfm. The data is updated every
   five years. ETA used the state-level data posted to this website in the state allotment formula
   for PY 2023 and future program years. Starting in PY 2023 and in future program years,
   states must use the updated data posted to the website to determine the number of
   disadvantaged Youth and Adults for use in their within-state local area allocation formulas.

 RESCISSIONS                                               EXPIRATION DATE
 TEGL 14-17                                                Continuing

   Appendix A provides additional information on relevant definitions, use of the ACS, and
   commonly asked questions regarding use of the disadvantaged Youth and Adult data.
   Appendix B provides a description of the files and their content.

5. Inquiries. Questions concerning this guidance should be directed to the appropriate ETA
   Regional Office.

6. References.
   • Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Section 2, 107, 127, 128, 132, 133, and 182;
      P.L. 113-128; 29 U.S.C. 3101, 3121, 3162 (b), 3163 (b), 3172 (b), 3173 (b)

7. Attachments.

   •   Appendix A: Questions and Answers on Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
       (WIOA) Disadvantaged Youth and Adult Data

   •   Appendix B: Description of Website File Contents, Layout, and Caveats

                                                              Appendix A
Questions and Answers on Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA)
                   Disadvantaged Youth and Adult Data

1. What is the definition of a disadvantaged Youth or Adult?

   See WIOA Sections 127(b)(2)(C) and 132(b)(1)(B)(v)(IV). A disadvantaged
   Youth is defined as “an individual who is age 16 through 21 who received an
   income or is a member of a family that received a total family income that, in
   relation to family size, does not exceed the higher of the poverty line, or 70
   percent of the Lower Living Standard Income Level (LLSIL).”

   The definition of a disadvantaged Adult is similar; but, per WIOA Section
   132(b)(1)(B)(v)(I), the age restriction is 22 to 72. WIOA Section 127(b)(3)
   requires DOL to exclude college students and members of the Armed Forces on
   active duty [as defined in 10 U.S.C. section 101(d)(1] from the number of
   disadvantaged Youth and Adults to the extent practicable.

   The LLSIL is an income level determined annually by the Secretary of Labor
   based on the most recent lower living family budget issued by the Secretary. The
   LLSILs used in the special tabulations were those published in 2020 (see Federal
   Register, Volume 85, Number 84, April 30, 2020, for the year 2020). Notices are
   located at https://www.doleta.gov/llsil/. For American Community Survey (ACS)
   income data from 2016 to 2020, the Census Bureau adjusted income levels for
   inflation to compare it with LLSIL and poverty levels for 2020.

2. What additional requirements are there for states with concentrated employment
   program grant recipients?

   The states of Kentucky, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, who have designated local
   areas served by concentrated employment program (CEP) grant recipients under
   WIOA Section 107(c)(1)(C), must use the higher of the number of disadvantaged
   Youth (or Adults) in such areas or the number of individuals age 16 to 21 (or
   Adults age 22 to 72) in families with an income below the “low-income level” in
   such area. The low-income level is defined in WIOA Section 127(b)(2)(E) and
   WIOA Section 132(b)(1)(B)(v)(VII). ETA calculated the following “low-income
   levels” in the chart below for these states for 2020, which were used by the
   Census Bureau to develop the special tabulations in Table 8:

                                 Low-Income Level
                                         2020
                               Kentucky $48,000
                               Minnesota $46,000
                               Wisconsin $46,000

                                       A-1

3. If college students are excluded “to the extent practicable”, why are college
   students in the labor force included in the counts for Table 6?

   We include college students in the labor force because it isn’t possible to exclude
   them. The Census Bureau cannot distinguish students who work full time from
   those who work part-time. The Census Bureau can exclude either: 1) all college
   students or 2) only college students who are not in the labor force. The Census
   Bureau cannot code special tabulations that exclude college students who work
   part-time. The Employment and Training Administration (ETA) finds it is better
   policy to exclude from the calculation of the number of disadvantaged youth only
   those college students who are not in the labor force. As a result, at the local
   level, some college towns may have a larger number of youth defined as
   disadvantaged than what the state feels is justified. ETA recognizes the issue, but
   it is currently not possible to exclude college students who work part-time from
   the tabulations.

   Demographic data on WIOA Youth and Adult participants suggests that a small
   percentage of participants are in post-secondary education and working while
   participating in the programs. This being the case, excluding all college students
   could remove some potential WIOA participants from the counts of
   disadvantaged Youth and Adults. According to the most recent WIOA data
   (Program Year (PY) 2021), 2.2 percent of WIOA Youth participants were in post-
   secondary education at enrollment. Of those in post-secondary education, 26.6
   percent were employed at enrollment. For Adult participants in PY 2021, 10.7
   percent were in post-secondary education at enrollment. Of those, 42.9 percent
   were also employed at enrollment. This suggests that there are adults in the
   workforce who are taking some college classes who could be WIOA participants
   and qualify as disadvantaged.

4. Why is ETA using the ACS?

   The most recent census, conducted in 2020, did not include the long form survey
   which ETA previously used to update the disadvantaged data. Instead, ETA
   worked with the Census Bureau to use data from the ACS.

   ACS data is based on a rolling annual sample survey mailed to approximately
   three million addresses a year over five years. The data used in the special
   tabulations for disadvantaged Youth and Adults was collected between January 1,
   2016 and December 31, 2020. By pooling several years of survey responses, the
   ACS can generate detailed statistical portraits of smaller geographies that can
   replace the data no longer collected in the long form of the decennial census.

   For more information on the ACS go to https://www.census.gov/programs-
   surveys/acs/.

                                       A-2

5.   When will the next update of the disadvantaged Youth and Adult data occur?

     The Census Bureau releases a new set of five-year estimates every year, but ETA
     anticipates updating the disadvantaged Youth and Adult data using the ACS only
     every five years. Therefore, the next update is anticipated to be in time for the PY
     2028 allocations.

6. My state’s disadvantaged data increased. Why did my state’s allotment not also
   increase?

     Allotment amounts are based on a state’s relative share of the total number of
     disadvantaged Youth or Adults, depending on the program, compared with other
     states’ relative shares. An increase in a state’s disadvantaged data does not
     always increase its relative share. Despite increases in the number of
     disadvantaged data, a state’s relative share may decrease, and that could cause the
     state’s allotment amount to decrease.

7. What data files on the website do I need to use?

     It depends on how your state defines local areas. Files labeled Table 6 contain
     data meeting the WIOA definition of disadvantaged Youth and Adults and are
     available at different geographic levels. Most states will need Table 6 at the
     County-level (050). Some states may need additional data at the County-
     Subdivision level (060) and County- or State-Place levels (155 and 160) to
     develop data sets for their states’ local areas. States that are a single area do not
     need the data at all. The State-level (040) and National-level (010) data are
     provided for states’ information.

     Kentucky, Minnesota, and Wisconsin will need additional data in Table 8 because
     these three states have designated CEPs. CEPs use the higher of the number of
     disadvantaged Youth or Adults contained in Table 6, or the number of individuals
     in the appropriate age range with an income below a low-income level (calculated
     based on the definition described in WIOA Sections 127(b)(2)(E) and
     132(b)(1)(B)(v)(VII)). Table 8 contains the number of individuals below these
     calculated income levels and is available at various geography levels (County
     050, County-Subdivision 060, County-Place 155, and State-Place 160).

     Arizona, and New Mexico also will need county-level American Indian
     Area/Alaska Native Area/Hawaiian Homeland Areas (270) data to determine
     Navajo Nation grant allocation amounts. Similar data at the state level (260) is
     also provided.

     The other tables (1-3, and 7) are provided for states’ information, but are not used
     in the WIOA Adult and Youth formulas. See Appendix B for a further
     description of the contents of tables 1-8.

                                           A-3

                                                                                    Appendix B

                 Description of Website File Contents, Layout, and Caveats

Website File Contents

The Excel files on the website contain the estimated number of individuals by age that fall within
certain defined population groups at various geographic levels. For the Workforce Innovation
and Opportunity Act (WIOA) state allotment and within-state allocation formulas, the population
meeting the WIOA definition of disadvantaged Youth or Adult is contained in files labeled Table

6. Three states (Kentucky, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) will also need files labeled Table 8.
According to WIOA, the age range for disadvantaged Youth is 16 to 21, and the age range for
disadvantaged Adults is 22 to 72 years.

The age groups are:

   •   Total (Persons of all ages (0 and over))
   •   Persons 0 to 13 years of age
   •   Persons 14 through 15 years
   •   Persons 16 through 21 years
   •   Persons 22 through 24 years
   •   Persons 25 through 54 years
   •   Persons 55 through 64 years
   •   Persons 65 through 72 years
   •   Persons 73 years and over

The geographic levels are:

   •   National (010)
   •   State (040)
   •   County (050)
   •   County-Subdivision (060)
   •   County-Place (155)
   •   State-Place (160)
   •   State-Level American Indian Area/Alaska Native Area/Hawaiian Homeland Areas (260)
   •   County-Level American Indian Area/Alaska Native Area/Hawaiian Homeland Areas
       (270)

The population groups include:

   •   Table 1A- Total number of persons, including persons living in housing units and persons
       living in Institutional or Non-Institutional Group Quarters.
   •   Table 1B- Total number of persons in the poverty universe (excludes unrelated
       individuals under 15 years of age, persons living in Institutional Group Quarters, persons

                                                   B-1

    in college dormitories, and persons in military group quarters). The above-listed groups
    are not in the poverty universe. Persons not in the poverty universe do not have a poverty
    status. They are neither poor nor non-poor.
•   Table 2- Number of persons in the poverty universe who have a 2020 inflation adjusted
    income in the past 12 months below the standard Census Bureau’s poverty threshold for
    that person. This is the number of persons in poverty.
•   Table 3- Number of persons who had a 2020 inflation adjusted income (family or
    individual) in the past 12 months below 70 percent of the Lower Living Standard Income
    Level (LLSIL) published in Federal Register, Volume 85, Number 84, April 30, 2020, for
    the year 2020. Notices are located at https://www.doleta.gov/llsil/. The Census Bureau
    compared the LLSIL threshold for a person to his (or her) income in the past 12 months
    in the following manner:
        o If a person was a member of a family, the Census Bureau used their family
            income to compare with the appropriate LLSIL threshold (those for 2-person
            families, 3-person families, 4-person families, etc.).
        o If a person was a member of a Non-Family household or a Group Quarters person
            (either Institutional or Non-Institutional), the Census Bureau used the person
            income to compare with the appropriate LLSIL threshold (those for a 1-person
            family).
        o If a person was in a family household, but was a non-relative to the householder,
            the Census Bureau used the person income to compare with the appropriate
            LLSIL threshold (those for a 1-person family).
•   Tables 4 and 5 were not posted to the website but are available upon request. Please
    contact your regional representative, who in turn will contact the national office, if this
    presents any state or local entity with an issue. Table 4 provides the number of persons
    who satisfy the requirements of Table 2 or Table 3 above. This includes persons in
    poverty but not below 70 percent of LLSIL, persons not in poverty but below 70 percent
    of LLSIL, and persons both in poverty and below 70 percent of LLSIL. Table 5 provides
    the number of persons in poverty (Table 2) excluding college students (undergraduate
    and graduate) not in the labor force (Employment Status Recode (ESR) of 6) or persons
    on active duty in the armed forces (ESR of 4 or 5) during the appropriate 2016-2020
    American Community Survey (ACS) reference week.
•   Table 6- The number of persons who satisfy the requirements of Table 2 or Table 3
    (persons in poverty but not below 70 percent of LLSIL, persons not in poverty but below
    70 percent of LLSIL, and persons both in poverty and below 70 percent of LLSIL)
    excluding college students (undergraduate and graduate) not in the labor force (ESR of 6)
    or persons on active duty in the armed forces (ESR of 4 or 5) during the appropriate
    2016-2020 ACS reference week. The population in Table 6 meets the definition of a
    disadvantaged Youth or Adult.
•   Table 7- The number of persons in the civilian labor force. The universe of Table 7 is
    limited to persons 16 years and over who were employed (ESR – 1 or 2) or unemployed
    (ESR = 3) during the appropriate 2016-2020 ACS reference week.
•   Table 8- The number of persons living in Kentucky, Minnesota, and Wisconsin (the three
    states that have designated local areas served by a concentrated employment program
    (CEP)) who received a 2020 inflation-adjusted income (either family or person) below
    the specified state “low-income levels” listed below. The “low-income levels” below

                                               B-2

       were calculated according to the definition in WIOA Section 127(b)(2)(E) and WIOA
       Section 132(b)(1)(B)(v)(VII).

                                              Low-Income Level
                                                          2020
                                            Kentucky    $48,000
                                            Minnesota   $46,000
                                            Wisconsin   $46,000

Website File Layout

The layout of the data in the files posted at
https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/budget/formula/disadvantagedyouthadults is very similar to
what was provided to states in 2018. Each file contains a different geographic level of detail (for
example, state versus county) and a different population group, but all fifty-two state entities
(including DC and Puerto Rico) are contained in each file. Each file contains two tabs. One tab
contains the ACS data tabulations obtained from the Census Bureau (labeled “Census Orig” with
the appropriate table number identifying the population group). On the “Census Orig” data tab,
geography and age extend down the Y axis. This tab also includes margin of error information
the states may find helpful. On a second tab, ETA used pivot tables to reformat the data
provided by the Census Bureau to make it easier to use. The second tab contains just the number
of individuals by age group meeting the population group definition for the file. This tab has
been formatted to read age across the X axis instead of down the Y axis. Because each file
contains information for all fifty-two state entities, filters have been added so that states can
select their state or counties of interest.

The “Census Orig” tab contains nine columns:

   •   TBLID – Table Identifier
   •   GEOID – Geographic Code Identifiers (For most summary levels, a concatenation of
       FIPS codes)
   •   GEONAME – Geographic Area Name
   •   TITLE – Description of Row Estimate
   •   SUMLEVEL – Census Bureau Summary Level Code
   •   ORDER – Order of Table Values (Identifies a particular characteristic across the
       geographic areas in a summary level. The values are repeated for each geographic area)
   •   CEST – Estimate
   •   CME – Margin of Error on Estimate at the 90-percent confidence level
   •   SOURCE – Source of data

                                                   B-3

Notes

Please note that the lower-level geographies may not sum to the higher-level geographies. The
Census Bureau separately tallied and rounded counts for each geographic summary level.
Therefore, the U.S. counts do not equal the sum of the state counts and counts for a particular
state do not equal the sum of the county counts for that state, and so on. Also, the Total columns,
or rows if using the “Census Orig” format, were tallied and rounded separately. For example,
Total Persons, All Ages, may not always equal the sum of the eight (or six) age categories for
Total Persons.

Additionally, please note Census Bureau documentation regarding a data processing error
impacting 2016-2020 Hispanic Origin data at https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/technical-documentation/errata/129.html.

Also, some files may have blank cells because the Census Bureau's Disclosure Review Board
(DRB) requested that the Census Bureau suppress any areas where the table universe contains
less than 3 persons. Tables that contain a universe of 1 or 2 unweighted person counts are a
disclosure risk and the Census Bureau is now required to suppress that data.

                                                   B-4

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace