Back to Federal guidance

Estate distribution to a plan fiduciary in stock sale

Summary EBSA said a violation of ERISA section 406(b)(3) generally would not be apparent merely because a fiduciary received a separate inheritance from an estate selling stock to the plan; the distribution would not appear connected to the plan's proposed purchase. It did not decide whether the preferred stock was qualifying or whether other conditions were satisfied.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
Advisory Opinion 1987-04A
Date issued
June 2, 1987
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-24.
Status last verified October 24, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-24. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

U.S. Department of Labor Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration Advisory Opinion 1987-04A June 2, 1987

[Recipient address omitted]

Re: Identification Number F-3596A

Dear Ms. Thompson:

This responds to your letter of January 27, 1987, in which you ask whether the purchase of preferred stock of a corporation by a defined benefit pension plan sponsored by that corporation would contravene the prohibited transaction provisions of section 406 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) if such stock is acquired from the estate of the father of a plan fiduciary. You suggest that the stock constitutes a "qualifying employer security" as defined by section 407(d)(5) of ERISA and that the plan's purchase would comply with the limitations imposed on such investments by section 407(a) of ERISA. 1

Subject to the limitations of section 408(d) of ERISA (relating to transactions involving owner-employees and certain other persons), section 408(e) of ERISA and regulation section 29 CFR 2550.408e provide, in pertinent part, that sections 406(a) and 406(b)(1) and (2) of ERISA do not apply to the acquisition of qualifying employer securities by a defined benefit pension plan if certain conditions are met. The conditions are that (1) the acquisition is for adequate consideration, (2) no commission is charged to the plan with respect to the transaction, and (3) the acquisition complies with the requirements of section 407(a) of ERISA. The regulation under section 408(e) of ERISA does not provide relief for an act described in section 406(b)(3) which prohibits a plan fiduciary from receiving any consideration for his own personal account from any party dealing with the plan in connection with a transaction involving the plan's assets.

Generally, a violation of section 406(b)(3) of ERISA would not be apparent from the mere receipt of a distribution from an estate by a plan fiduciary as beneficiary of the estate in a transaction separate and apart from the plan's acquisition of qualifying employer securities from that estate. Under such circumstances, the distribution would not appear to be in connection with a transaction involving plan assets.

This letter constitutes an advisory opinion under ERISA Procedure 76-1. Accordingly, this letter is issued subject to the provisions of the Procedure, including section 10 relating to the effect of advisory opinions.

Sincerely,

Elliot I. Daniel Associate Director for Regulations and Interpretations

Footnotes

  1. You have not asked us to address any issues under section 407 of ERISA and, accordingly, we have not considered those issues for purposes of this response. However, you may wish to note that the Department has declined to issue an opinion regarding whether an issue of stock constitutes a qualifying employer security in a case involving preferred stock that had characteristics similar to a debt obligation. See Advisory Opinion 81-33, March 23, 1981 (copy enclosed).

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace