Back to Federal guidance

Oregon trust company as bank under PTE 80-51

Summary EBSA said Capital Trust counted as a bank for class exemption PTE 80-51 when maintaining Real Estate Equity Fund II. It did not decide whether any particular investment met another exemption or general fiduciary duties. The opinion concerns the proposed real-estate fund.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
Advisory Opinion 1983-12A
Date issued
March 11, 1983
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-24.
Status last verified October 24, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-24. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

U.S. Department of Labor Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration Advisory Opinion 1983-12A March 11, 1983

[Recipient address omitted]

Re: Capital Consultants, Inc. Identification No: F-2073

Dear Mr. Zalutsky:

This is in response to your letters of August 5, 1981, December 21, 1981, and February 1, 1982, and your telephone conversations with Mr. Barry Newman of this office, requesting an advisory opinion concerning the availability of the Class Exemption for Certain Transactions Involving Bank Collective Investment Funds (PTE 80-51), 45 FR 49709, July 25, 1980.

You represent that Capital Consultants, Inc. (CCI) serves as investment manager [as defined in section 3(38) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)] for multiemployer and single employer benefit plans. Capital Trust, a wholly owned subsidiary of CCI, is a trust company subject to the supervision and examination of the Superintendent of Banks of the State of Oregon as a "financial institution". 1 Capital Trust has established the Plan of Operation for Real Estate Equity Fund II (the Fund), a group trust which has as its primary purpose the investment of employee benefit plan assets in real estate. Capital Trust is trustee for the Fund and CCI will serve as its investment manager.

In your letter of June 18, 1981, to the Internal Revenue Service, you stated that “Capital Trust's business consists of exercising fiduciary powers similar to those authorized to national banks by the Comptroller of the Currency… The Fund is supervised by the Superintendent of Banks of the State of Oregon. It is maintained in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Comptroller of the Currency pertaining to the collective investment of trust funds by national banks.”

You have requested an advisory opinion concerning whether Capital Trust Company will be considered to be a “bank” for purposes of PTE 80-51 when it acts as trustee under a common trust fund established for investment by employee benefit plans.

PTE 80-51 provides an exemption for certain transactions entered into by “collective investment funds that are maintained by banks and in which employee benefit plans participate …”.

Although the term “bank” is not defined in PTE 80-51, the term “collective investment fund” is defined in section IV(e) of the class exemption as a “common or collective trust fund or pooled investment fund maintained by a bank or trust company”. Moreover section M of the preamble to the class exemption provides, in part, that “(r)elief was granted for bank collective investment funds, among other reasons, because such funds are regulated by other governmental agencies…”.

The circumstances described in this case indicate that Capital Trust is regulated by the same state authority and in the same manner as state chartered banks. Therefore, it is the opinion of the Department that Capital Trust is a bank for purposes of PTE 80-51, when it maintains the Fund for the collective investment of employee benefit plan assets.

We wish to note that you have not requested, and the Department has not considered, whether an investment of plan assets in the Fund would be encompassed by the statutory exemption contained in section 408(b)(8) of ERISA or otherwise conforms to the general fiduciary responsibility provisions of section 404(a) of ERISA.

This letter constitutes an advisory opinion under ERISA Procedure 76-1. Accordingly, this letter is issued subject to the provisions of the procedure, including section 10, relating to the effect of advisory opinions.

Sincerely

Alan D. Lebowitz Assistant Administrator for Fiduciary Standards Pension and Welfare Benefit Programs

Footnotes

  1. A "financial institution" is defined in ORS 706.005(13) to mean "a bank, a trust company or a savings bank."

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace