Back to Federal guidance

Truman Medical Center plan remains nongovernmental

Summary EBSA declined to change its earlier conclusion that the Truman Medical Center retirement plan was not a governmental plan. It still viewed the center as an independent contractor rather than a government-controlled agency, and said ERISA effective dates were statutory. The opinion concerns that center and plan.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
Advisory Opinion 1983-08A
Date issued
January 24, 1983
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-24.
Status last verified October 24, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-24. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

U.S. Department of Labor Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration Advisory Opinion 1983-08A January 24, 1983

[Recipient address omitted]

Dear Mr. Wilcher:

This is in reply to your letter of January 15, 1982, requesting a reconsideration of our advisory opinion to you dated January 6, 1982 (Opinion 82-2A). In that opinion, the Department of Labor (the Department) took the position that the Truman Medical Center Retirement Plan (the Plan) was not a governmental plan within the meaning of section 3(32) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and, unless otherwise excluded from coverage, would have to comply with the applicable requirements of title I of ERISA.

Specifically, your letter of January 15, 1982, requests:

1) that the Department reconsider its advisory opinion of January 6, 1982,

2) that the Department not implement that opinion until the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) completes its reconsideration of its determination dated December 9, 1981, that the Plan is not a governmental plan within the meaning of section 4021(b)(2) of ERISA and that the Plan is covered by title IV of ERISA, and

3) that, if it is finally determined that the Plan is not a governmental plan, the effective date of such treatment should be January 1, 1982.

With regard to your first request, the Department has reviewed the position stated in our advisory opinion of January 6, 1982. However, it is still the Department’s position that Truman Medical Center (TMC) is not a governmental agency or instrumentality within the meaning of section 3(32) of ERISA. The Department still views the relationship of TMC to the governmental entities involved as that of an independent contractor, not controlled by any of those entities. We note that TMC has been considered nongovernmental by the PBGC, the Social Security Administration, and the National Labor Relations Board.

With regard to your second request, it is our understanding that the PBGC has completed its reconsideration of its determination that the Plan is not exempt from coverage under title IV of ERISA.

Finally, with regard to your request that the effective date for coverage under title I of ERISA be January 1, 1982 if the Plan is determined not to be a governmental plan, we note that the effective dates of parts 1, 2, 3, and 4 of title I of ERISA are statutorily determined and contained in sections 111, 211, 306, and 414 of title I of ERISA, respectively.

This letter constitutes an advisory opinion under ERISA Procedure 76-1. Accordingly, this letter is issued subject to the provisions of such procedure, including section 10 thereof relating to the effect of advisory opinions.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey N. Clayton Administrator Pension and Welfare Benefit Programs

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace