Back to Federal guidance

Retirement association as insurer and investment manager

Summary The Labor Department said the National Health and Welfare Retirement Association qualified as an insurance company for the cited ERISA investment-manager definition and as a state-supervised carrier for a pooled-account reporting rule. It could serve as an investment manager only if it also met the rule’s other requirements. The opinion relies on its contracts and represented state qualifications.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
Advisory Opinion 80-56A
Date issued
September 3, 1980
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-24.
Status last verified October 24, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-24. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

U.S. Department of Labor
Labor-Management Services Administration
Opinion 80-56A
September 3, 1980

Mr. Daniel J. Robins
Vice President and Secretary
National Health and Welfare Retirement Association, Inc.
360 Park Avenue South
New York, New York 10010

Dear Mr. Robins:

This is in response to your letters inquiring whether the National Health and Welfare Retirement Association (NHWRA) is an “insurance company” within the meaning of the definition of the term “investment manager” in section 3(38) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), and an insurance carrier regulated and supervised and subject to periodic examination by a State agency within the meaning of 29 CFR §2520.103-4 (which provides an exemption from certain annual reporting requirements for assets held in an insurance company pooled separate account).1 We regret the long delay in responding to your request.

In an advisory opinion dated February 10, 1975, the Department stated, in response to an inquiry made by you in a letter dated October 30, 1974, and on the basis of the representations made in that letter, that NHWRA is an “insurance company” within the meaning of section 403(b) of ERISA.2 In considering your request for an opinion under section 3(38) of ERISA and 29 CFR §2520.103-4, we have relied on the representations made in your October 30, 1974, letter as well as your letters of July 7, 1975, and November 26, 1975.

NHWRA is a non-profit association incorporated and licensed as a retirement system under section 200 of the New York Insurance Law. Membership in NHWRA is limited to non-profit organizations in the United States and Canada devoted to charitable health or welfare work. The purpose of NHWRA is to provide pension benefits to employees of its members and its own employees. The benefits provided by NHWRA are based upon contributions made by employees and by the employer charities. Some of the benefits are funded through guaranteed deferred annuities under various group contacts entered into between NHWRA and its members, while other benefits are provided through deposit administration group annuity contracts.

Pursuant to section 200 of the New York Insurance Law, NHWRA is subject to supervision by the New York State Superintendent of Insurance, and this supervision is, in many respects, similar to the supervision exercised over domestic life insurance companies.

Section 3(38) of ERISA defines the term investment manager as any fiduciary (other than a trustee or named fiduciary, as defined in section 402(a)(2)) --(A) who has the power to manage, acquire or dispose of any asset of a plan;

(B) who is (i) registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940; (ii) is a bank, as defined in that Act; or (iii) is an insurance company qualified to perform services described in subparagraph (A) under the laws of more than one State;3 and (C) has acknowledged in writing that he is a fiduciary with respect to the plan.

Therefore, if NHWRA is an “insurance company” described in section 3(38)(B)(iii) of ERISA, it may serve as an “investment manager” to an employee benefit plan, provided that it meets the requirements of section 3(38)(A) and (C) with respect to such plan.

Because NHWRA appears to issue contracts to its members which provide insurance benefits for individual employees, it is the Department’s view that NHWRA is an “insurance company” for purposes of section 3(38) of ERISA.4 In your letter of July 7, 1975, moreover, you state that the NHWRA is qualified under the laws of New York and California to perform services described in section 3(38)(A) of ERISA. On the basis of this representation, we are of the opinion that NHWRA is an insurance company described in section 3(38)(B)(iii) of ERISA.

Under 29 CFR 2520.103-4(b) the exemption from certain annual reporting requirements set forth in that section applies only to a plan some or all of the assets of which are held in a pooled separate account (as defined therein) of an insurance carrier regulated and supervised and subject to periodic examination by a State agency. In view of the guaranteed deferred annuity contracts that NHWRA issues to its members, and in view of the supervision by the New York State Superintendent of Insurance to which the NHWRA is subject, we have concluded that the NHWRA is an insurance carrier regulated and supervised and subject to periodic examination by a State Agency for purposes of §2520.103-4(b).

The letter constitutes an advisory opinion under ERISA Procedure 76-1. Accordingly, this letter is subject to the provisions of the procedure, including section 10 thereof relating to the effect of advisory opinions.

Sincerely,

Ian D. Lanoff
Administrator
Pension and Welfare Benefit Programs

Footnotes

Footnote 1. Section 2520.103-4 when originally proposed was numbered as §2520.103-2 (40 FR 53710, November 19, 1975).

Footnote 2. Section 403(b) of ERISA provides, in part, that the requirement of section 403(a) that employee benefit plan assets be held in trust does not apply to any assets of an insurance company qualified to do business in a state or with respect to any assets of a plan that are held by such an insurance company.

Footnote 3. The term “State” is defined in section 3(10) of ERISA as including any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, Wake Island, and the Canal Zone.

Footnote 4. In an advisory opinion dated February 5, 1980 (a copy of which is enclosed) the Department concluded that section 200 of the New York Insurance Law, as applied to the Savings Bank Retirement System (a trust formed under N.Y. Ins. Law §200), is not a law regulating insurance and is therefore preempted by ERISA. However, in its request for an opinion, the Savings Bank Retirement System specifically represented that it does not guarantee any of the benefits which are provided from its assets, and, accordingly, unlike NHWRA, it does not appear that the Savings Bank Retirement System issues insurance contracts.

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace