Back to Federal guidance

C and O railroad hospital association under ERISA

Summary A railroad hospital association asked whether its benefit program was an ERISA welfare plan and whether its assets could avoid ERISA’s trust requirement. The Department said COEHA, jointly established by the employer and employees and maintained by union representatives, was a covered welfare plan. It could not give a final answer on the trust exemption while regulations were pending, although participant contributions appeared to make a proposed unfunded plan exception unavailable. The answer concerns the described contributions and governance.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
Opinion 79-32 A
Date issued
May 22, 1979
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-24.
Status last verified October 24, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-24. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

U.S. Department of Labor
Labor-Management Services Administration
Opinion 79-32 A
May 22, 1979

[Recipient address omitted]

Dear Mr. Dray:

Re: Identification Number: C-4227A

This is in reply to your letter of January 9, 1978, forwarding a copy of your September 9, 1977 advisory opinion request concerning applicability of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to the C and O Employees' Hospital Association (COEHA). We regret the delay in responding to your inquiry due to the volume of correspondence concerning ERISA.

Specifically, your inquiry concerns whether the COEHA program constitutes an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of ERISA section 3(1). Further, you request that if the Department of Labor opines that the COEHA program is a covered plan, that it be exempt from the application of ERISA section 403(a) which requires that all assets of an employee benefit plan be held in trust.

You represent that COEHA was founded jointly by the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company and its employees and is currently administered by a board of directors consisting of a chief administrative officer and 12 representatives of labor unions which are parties to collective bargaining agreements with the Company.

The Company contributes to COEHA on behalf of each of its active employees pursuant to national collective bargaining agreements. In addition, active employees pay dues to COEHA through withholding arrangements with the Company whereby the Company pays over such amounts to COEHA within 1 month of their being withheld. Retirees pay dues directly to COEHA in return for benefits, and the Company makes no contributions on their behalf.

Section 3(1) of ERISA defines the term "employee welfare benefit plan" as "…any plan, fund, or program which was heretofore or is hereafter established or maintained by an employer or by an employee organization, or by both, to the extent that such plan, fund, or program was established or is maintained for the purpose of providing for its participants or their beneficiaries, through the purchase of insurance or otherwise, (A) medical, surgical, or hospital care or benefits, or benefits in the event of sickness, accident, disability, death or unemployment, or vacation benefits, apprenticeship or other training programs, or day care centers, scholarship funds, or prepaid legal services, or (B) any benefit described in section 302(c) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947 (other than pensions on retirement or death, and insurance to provide such pensions)."

It is the position of the Department that COEHA is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) because it was established jointly by the employer and employees and is now maintained by representatives of labor unions to which the participants belong, and it provides benefits specified in section 3(1) to participants and their beneficiaries.

On the basis of the information furnished in your letter, it does not appear that the Plan would fall within the category of plans to be exempted from the trust requirement under the proposed regulation (copy attached) issued under section 403(b)(4) of ERISA. The proposed regulation exempts only unfunded welfare benefit plans from the trust requirement of section 403(a) of the Act. The preamble to that regulation states that a plan is not an unfunded welfare benefit plan if participants and beneficiaries make contributions to the plan through withholding or otherwise. In the case where the "employee beneficiary association" exists primarily for the purpose of providing welfare benefits, dues paid by members would be construed to constitute contributions in order to obtain benefits. Because certain participants and beneficiaries of the COEHA program make contributions in order to obtain benefits, the Plan does not come within the definition of an unfunded welfare benefit plan under the proposed regulation.

The Department of Labor is currently considering the comments received on the attached regulation prior to publication of such regulation in final form. Because the regulation has not yet been adopted, it will not be possible to respond definitively to the questions you have raised concerning section 403(a) at this time. If, after regulations under section 403(b)(4) are adopted, you continue to have questions regarding the application of this section, you may wish to consider resubmitting your questions to us for a definitive reply.

Generally, a covered employee benefit plan must comply with the reporting and disclosure requirements which are applicable. The final summary plan description regulations were issued on July 19, 1977 and the final annual report regulations were issued March 10, 1978 (copies enclosed).

This letter constitutes an advisory opinion under ERISA Procedure 76-1, 41 FR 36281. Accordingly, this letter is issued subject to the provisions of that procedure, including section 10 thereof relating to the effect of advisory opinions. We have considered your request for a conference under section 8 of the procedure and have decided that a conference is not necessary in providing these advisory opinions.

Sincerely,

Alan D. Lebowitz
Assistant Administrator
Office of Fiduciary Standards

Enclosures

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace