Back to Federal guidance
Annual bonus pool outside ERISA pension rules
Summary DOL found that the described incentive compensation trust paid each pool’s net income to participating employees soon after each calendar year. Because the amounts were work bonuses rather than systematically deferred retirement income, the arrangement was neither an ERISA pension plan nor another employee benefit plan under the facts supplied.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
Opinion 77-26 A
Date issued
March 4, 1977
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026
Topics
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
U.S DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Pension and Welfare Benefits Programs
Washington, D.C. 20216
OPINION 77-26 A
3(2)
Mr. Michael E. Dunn
Andrews Mosburg Davis Elam Legg & Bixler, Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Dunn:
This is in reply to your letter concerning the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). We
regret that the volume of correspondence has resulted
in a delay in responding.
You state that you represent Dyco Petroleum Corporation
(the Company), a firm which has established the Incentive
Compensation Plan and Trust Agreement (the Plan) for the
purpose of improving recruiting and retention of upper
management personnel. The Company is engaged in the oil
and gas industry and is in the business of owning, trans-
ferring, conveying, and selling oil and gas leasehold
interests. Prior to or concurrently with a sale, the
Company carries out an overriding royalty interest from
the leasehold interest and transfers the overriding
royalty interest to the Plan. Those overriding royalty
interests transferred to the Plan during a calendar year
are collectively referred to as a "Pool". Within a
reasonable time after the end of each calendar year, the
Trustee pays to the participants of each "Pool" their
respective shares of net income from the "Pool". You
request a ruling as to whether the Plan constitutes an
"employee benefit plan" within the meaning of ERISA.
The Department of Labor has adopted an advisory opinion
procedure (ERISA Procedure 76-1, copy enclosed) which
describes the general procedures for issuing information
letters and advisory opinions under ERISA. Pursuant to
ERISA Procedure 76-1, this letter is to have the effect
of an advisory opinion.
OPINION 77-26 A
Section 3(3) of ERISA defines the term "employee benefit
plan" to include employee welfare benefit plan or an
employee pension benefit plan or a plan which is both a
welfare and a pension plan. Section 4(a) indicates that
such plans are subject to the provisions of Title I of
ERISA.
Section 2510.3-2 of regulations issued by the Department
on August 15, 1975 (copy enclosed) clarifies the defini-
tion of the term pension plan for purposes of Title I of
ERISA. As indicated in section 2510.3-2(c), the term
"pension plan" should not include payments made by an
employer to some or all of its employees as bonuses for
work performed unless such payments are systematically
deferred to the termination of covered employment or
beyond or so as to provide retirement income to employees.
Pursuant to the Plans' provisions, the Trustee pays to
the participants of each "Pool" their respective shares
of net income from each "Pool" within a reasonable time
after the end of each calendar year, or more often as the
Trustee determines at his discretion. Therefore, the
Plan qualifies as a bonus program described in section
2510.3-2(c). As such, it is neither a pension plan nor
an employee benefit plan and is not subject to the pro-
visions of Title I of ERISA.
Sincerely,
Fred W. Stuckwisch
Director
Office of Regulatory Standards
and Exceptions
Enclosures
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace