Back to Federal guidance
Teachers’ charitable relief fund outside ERISA
Summary DOL found that the Mary Muldoon Fund’s charitable aid to needy members of a teachers’ organization was neither an ERISA welfare plan nor a pension plan. Its financial-hardship benefit was outside the categories in sections 3(1) and 3(2), so the fund was not subject to Title I on the described facts.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
Opinion 77-24 A
Date issued
February 18, 1977
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026
Topics
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Pension and Welfare Benefit Programs
Washington, D.C. 20216
FEB 18 1977
OPINION 77-24 A
3(1)
3(32)
Richard B. Covey, Esquire
Carter, Ledyard, and Milburn
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Covey:
This is in reply to your letter concerning the Employee Retire-
ment Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). We regret that the
volume of correspondence has resulted in a delay in responding.
You state that the Mary Muldoon Fund (the Fund) is maintained
by New York State United Teachers (Teachers) to provide assist-
ance to needy members. Teachers is an unincorporated associa-
tion of teachers and other educators employed in New York State.
The Fund derives its funding through contributions from Teachers,
voluntary contributions, bequests, and income from the principal
of the Fund. The Fund is administered by a Fund Committee which
makes grants on the basis of facts submitted by the applicant.
Grants may be in the form of monthly allowances to augment a
retirement benefit too low to maintain a reasonable standard of
living or a lump sum payment to cover an emergency situation.
You question whether the Fund is subject to the requirements of
ERISA.
The Department of Labor has adopted an advisory opinion proce-
dure (ERISA Procedure 76-1, copy enclosed) which describes the
general procedures for issuing information letters and advisory
opinions under ERISA. Pursuant to ERISA Procedure 76-1, this
letter is to have the effect of an advisory opinion.
Sections 3(1) and 3(2) of ERISA define the term “welfare plan”
and “pension plan” to include programs established or maintained
by employee organizations. However, the Fund provides a charita-
ble benefit in the event of financial difficulty rather than one
of the benefits enumerated in section 3(1) and 3(2). Therefore,
- 2
OPINION 77-24 A
the Fund is neither a welfare plan nor a pension plan and
is not subject to the provisions of Title I of ERISA.
Sincerely,
Fred W. Stuckwisch
Director
Office of Regulatory Standards
and Exceptions
Enclosure
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace