Back to Federal guidance

Bonding an ERISA plan through an administrator-owned agency

Summary A plan administrator sought an exemption so an insurance agency he partly owned could procure the plans' required bonds. DOL said ERISA section 412(c) barred procuring a required bond through an agency in which a party in interest had control or a significant financial interest. The section 408 exemption and section 414 transition rule the requester cited did not apply to that prohibition; the answer concerns the ownership relationship described.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
P/OPINION 76-92
Date issued
September 13, 1976
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
P/OPINION 76-92

408
412
414

September 13, 1976

Dear:         :

Thank you for your request for an exemption under the provisions of section 408 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) in connection with the procuring of bonds through          Inc. (Agency), a general insurance agency. We regret we were unable to respond to your request earlier.

You state that Mr.       is one of the owners of the Agency in addition to being the Administrator of the above plans. You further state that the plans did not have proper bonding coverage prior to the time the Agency represented the plans for placing the coverage. It is your view that the Agency relationship to the plans falls within the purview of section 414 (c) (4) of ERISA until June 30, 1977, but you request a permanent exemption since bonding protection will be required after that date.

The bonding provisions of ERISA are contained in section 412. It is unlawful under section 412(c) for any person to procure a required bond through an agent in whose business operation a party in interest has any control or significant financial interest. It would appear that the relationship of Mr.          as Administrator (a party in interest) of the above plans and also an owner of the Agency is one proscribed by the foregoing. ERISA's exemption provisions regarding bonding are contained in section 412(e). Accordingly, it is concluded that sections 408 and 414(c)(4) are not applicable to transactions which are unlawful under section 412(c).

Sincerely,

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace