Back to Federal guidance
Bank trustee's conflict as a secured employer creditor
Summary DOL reviewed a proposed arrangement in which a plan's bank trustee was also a major secured creditor of the employer whose securities formed much of the plan's assets. DOL said the bank could not act solely for participants while it held that conflicting creditor position, so serving as trustee was unlawful on the stated facts. The letter also requested corrective steps in that specific case.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
P/OPINION 76-32
Date issued
January 13, 1976
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026
Topics
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
P/OPINION 76-32
404(a)(1)
January 13, 1976
Gentlemen:
[Employer] filed an application for exemption under section 408(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and section 4975 (c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 on November 6, 1975. The application was supplemented by letters dated December 10 and December 15, 1975. By letter dated December 29, 1975, you were advised that the Department of Labor and Internal Revenue Service had tentatively decided to deny the requested exemption. A conference was held on December 30, 1975 to discuss the exemption application and the basis for the tentative denial.
At the conference, the government expressed a willingness to consider such further information as you might wish to submit in support of the application for exemption, and we continue to be open to such a submission.
However, the information heretofore provided to us by the applicant and by counsel indicates, among other things, that [Bank] is the major secured creditor of and at the same time is serving as trustee of the (Plan). [Bank] has participated in the negotiation of a proposed creditor’s arrangement pursuant to which plan assets are to be surrendered for nominal or no consideration. These facts have been considered by the Department of Labor in light of its statutory responsibility for the enforcement of Title I of ERISA.
It is our view that when a significant portion of plan assets consists of the securities of one issuer, it is not possible for a plan trustee to act “solely in the interest of the [plan’s] participants and beneficiaries” in conformity with ERISA section 404(a)(1) if he, the trustee, is simultaneously in his non-fiduciary capacity a substantial secured creditor of the issuer of those securities.
Therefore, it is our position that is not lawful for [Bank] to serve as trustee for the Plan while it is a substantial secured creditor of [Employer].
Accordingly, please advise this office within fifteen days of the steps you have taken or propose to take in order to correct the present situation, so that this conflict can be remedied promptly and without the need for legal action by this Department.
Sincerely,
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace