Back to Federal guidance

Valuing closely held employer securities for a plan

Summary A proposed profit sharing plan sought advice on buying closely held employer stock at adjusted book value. DOL said it would not make an advance adequate-consideration determination for an individual sale. In the absence of its section 3(18) regulations, the trustee had to determine fair market value in good faith using recognized valuation methods. DOL said this answer controlled to the extent inconsistent with its January 15, 1975 letter. The answer concerns the proposed transaction.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
P/OPINION 76-16
Date issued
January 26, 1976
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
P/OPINION 76-16

                                                     3(18) ✓
                                                     408(e)

                    January 26, 1976



Dear          :
This is in further response to Mr.           ' letter of
November 10, 1975 to           and your phone conversation
of December 23, 1975 with                and
of my staff.

According to Mr.        ' letter of November 10, 1975,
exemption pursuant to section 408(a) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to permit
a proposed profit sharing plan to purchase qualifying employer
securities from existing shareholders, primarily the
Chairman of the Board of Applicant, at "book value" subject
to adjustments as provided in article IX of the Applicant's
By-Laws. You indicate that the proposed plan would function
similar to an "ESOP" in that an individual participant's
accounts would be credited directly with shares of qualifying
employer securities.

          letter requests a ruling that section 408(e) of
ERISA is applicable to the proposed purchase of employer
securities. Section 408(e) of ERISA provides, in part,
that sections 406 and 407 shall not apply to securities
(as defined in section 407(d)(5)): 1) if such acquisition
or sale is for adequate consideration, 2) if no commission
is charged with respect to the acquisition or sale, and
3) if the plan is an eligible individual account plan
(as defined in section 407(d)(3)).
P/OPINION 76-16

Under section 3(18) of ERISA the term “adequate consideration,”
in the case of a security for which there is no generally
recognized market, means the fair market value of the
security as determined in good faith by the trustee
or named fiduciary with respect to a plan pursuant to
the terms of the plan and in accordance with regulations
promulgated by the Department of Labor. The Department
has not yet issued such regulations and does not, at the
present time, contemplate making advance determinations
as to adequate consideration in the case of individual
purchases and sales. Such guidelines as will be issued
will be general guidelines in the form of regulations
under section 3(18) of ERISA.

In view of the fact that no regulations have been issued
under section 3(18), the trustee of the plan would have
to make a good faith determination with respect to the
fair market value of the applicant's common stock,
utilizing recognized methods of determining the value
of stock in closely held corporations.

To the extent the position expressed in this letter
is inconsistent with our letter dated January 15, 1975,
the views set forth herein are controlling.

I regret any inconvenience which may have resulted
from our correspondence. If I can be of any assistance,
please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace