Back to Federal guidance

State school retirement plan reporting exemption

Summary A board of education asked whether its schools had to file plan reports and descriptions. DOL found that the state school retirement plan was established and administered by state agencies, making it a governmental plan excluded from the earlier disclosure statute and ERISA Title I. It said Forms D-2 and EBS-1 were unnecessary for this plan, while some federal tax provisions could still apply.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
P/OPINION 76-131
Date issued
December 20, 1976
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
P/OPINION   76-131

                                                     3(32)

                     December 20, 1976



 Dear           :

 Thank you for your letter dated August 29, 1975,
 requesting a determination that the (named) Board of
 Education is not required to complete the Employee Welfare
 and Pension Benefit Plan Annual Report Form D-2 or the
 Plan Description Form EBS-1. I am sorry we could not
 reply sooner. You request this on the basis that any plan
 of the (named) Schools is a government plan.

 According to your letter and your conversation with a
 member of my staff, the (named) schools are agencies of
 (State). The Schools and their employees contribute to
 the State Retirement System, which is administered by a
 Board of Trustees under the complete control of the
 Legislature.

 Section 4(b)(1) of the Welfare and Pension Plans
 Disclosure Act (WPPDA) excludes from coverage under that
 Act any plan administered by the government of a State or
 by an Agency or instrumentality of a State. Section
 4(b)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
 1974 (ERISA) excludes governmental plans from coverage
 under title I of the ERISA. Section 3(32) of the ERISA
 defines the term "governmental plan", in part, to mean a
 plan established or maintained for its employees by the
 Government of the United States, by the government of any
 State or political subdivision thereof, or by any agency
 or instrumentality of any of the foregoing.

 Based on the foregoing, it is concluded that the plan is
 established, maintained and administered for its employees
 by agencies or incrementalities of (State). Accordingly,
 it is concluded that the plan is a governmental plan and
                           - 2 -


P/OPINION 76-131

exempt from coverage under the WPPDA and title I of the
ERISA pursuant to the provisions of section 4(b)(l) of
each Act. Neither the D-2 nor the EBS-1 need be filed
with the Department of Labor.

However, even though a governmental plan is exempt from
coverage under title I, many of the tax provisions of
title II (which are administered by the Internal Revenue
Service) may apply. For example, governmental plans may
qualify under section 40l(a) of the Internal Revenue Code
in order to attain special tax treatment for employees who
participate under such types of plans. Although a govern-
mental plan does not have to meet the alternative minimum
participation, vesting, and funding requirements added to
the Code by title II, in order to attain qualified status,
it must satisfy the coverage requirements of section
40l(a)(3) of the Code, the nondiscrimination rules of
section 40l(a)(4), and the vesting provisions of section
40l(a)(7), as in effect prior to the enactment of the
ERISA. In addition, qualified governmental plans must
satisfy the requirements of section 415 of the Code
relating to contributions or benefits.

Sincerely,

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace