Back to Federal guidance

City pension plan as governmental plan

Summary A city asked whether its administered employee pension plan was subject to ERISA Title I. DOL concluded that the city was a political subdivision and that the plan was a governmental plan exempt from Title I. It noted that some Title II tax provisions might still apply. The determination concerns the described city plan.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
P/OPINION 76-127
Date issued
December 10, 1976
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
P/OPINION   76-127

                                                    3(32)

                     December 10, 1976



 Dear           :

Thank you for your letter dated March 15, 1976, requesting
a determination whether an employee pension plan admin-
istered by the City of (named) is exempt from title I of
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA). I am sorry we could not reply sooner.

 Section 4(b)(1) of the ERISA provides that title I shall
 not apply to any employee benefit plan if such plan is a
 governmental plan as defined in section 3(32). This
 section, in part, defines a governmental plan as a plan
 established or maintained for its employees by the
 Government of the United States, by the government of any
 State or political subdivision thereof, or by any agency
 or instrumentality of any of the foregoing.

 Since the pension plan is administered by (City), a
 political subdivision of a State, it is concluded that the
 plan is a "governmental plan" as defined in section 3(32)
 of the ERISA, and is exempt from coverage under title I
 pursuant to the provisions of section 4(b)(l).

 However, even though a governmental plan is exempt from
 coverage under title I, many of the tax provisions of
 title II (which are administered by the Internal Revenue
 Service) may apply. For example, governmental plans may
 qualify under section 40l(a) of the Internal Revenue Code
 in order to attain special tax treatment for employees who
 participate under such types of plans. Although a govern-
 mental plan does not have to meet the alternative minimum
 participation, vesting, and funding requirements added to
 the Code by title II, in order to attain qualified status,
                           - 2 -

P/OPINION    76-127

it must satisfy the coverage requirements of section
40l(a)(3) of the Code, the nondiscrimination rules of
section 40l(a)(4), and the vesting provisions of section
40l(a)(7), as in effect prior to the enactment of the
ERISA. In addition, qualified governmental plans must
satisfy the requirements of section 415 of the Code
relating to contributions or benefits.

Sincerely,

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace