Back to Federal guidance

Municipal hospital benefit plans as governmental plans

Summary A town-appointed board administered a municipal hospital that funded a state retirement plan and employee insurance. DOL concluded that the hospital was an instrumentality of a political subdivision, making the described benefit plans governmental plans exempt from ERISA Title I. It noted that some Title II tax provisions could still apply.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
P/OPINION 76-124
Date issued
December 10, 1976
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
P/OPINION 76-124

                                                     3(32)
                   December 10, 1976


Dear          :

Thank you for your letter dated May 20, 1976, requesting a
determination under the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). I am sorry we could not
reply sooner.

According to your letter and your conversation with a
member of my staff, the (named) Memorial Hospital, a
municipal hospital, is administered by a Board of Managers
appointed by the Town of (named). Employees are under the
(State) Civil Service System. The Hospital makes the
total contribution to the (State) Non—Contributory Retire—
ment Plan. The Hospital also contracts with (named), Inc.,
for coverage, paying the entire premium for coverage of
employees. Dependents may be covered at the employee's
option, the additional premium being paid by the
employee.

Section 4(b)(1) of the ERISA exempts governmental plans
from coverage thereunder. Section 3(32) defines the term
"governmental plan", in part, to mean a plan established
or maintained for its employees by the Government of the
United States, by the government of any State or political
subdivision thereof, or by any agency or instrumentality
of any of the foregoing.

Based on the above, it is concluded that the plans are
established and maintained for its employees by the
(named) Memorial Hospital, an instrumentality of (Town), a
political subdivision of (State). Accordingly, the
employee benefit plans are "governmental plans" as defined
in section 3(32) of the ERISA, and are exempt from Title I
pursuant to the provisions of section 4(b)(1).
                          - 2 -


P/OPINION 76-124

However, even though a governmental plan is exempt from
coverage under Title I, many of the tax provisions of
Title II (which are administered by the Internal Revenue
Service) may apply. For example, governmental plans may
qualify under section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code
in order to attain special tax treatment for employees who
participate under such types of plans. Although a
governmental plan does not have to meet the alternative
minimum participation, vesting, and funding requirements
added to the Code by Title II, in order to attain quali—
fied status, it must satisfy the coverage requirements of
section 401(a)(3) of the Code, the nondiscrimination rule
of section 401(a)(4), and the vesting provisions of
section 401(a)(7), as in effect prior to the enactment of
the ERISA. In addition, qualified governmental plans must
satisfy the requirements of section 415 of the Code
relating to contributions or benefits.

Sincerely,

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace