Back to Federal guidance

Plan land purchase after party in interest trustee resigns

Summary A plan sought an exemption to buy land from the estate of a former participating employer’s sole shareholder. DOL found that the estate’s executor, formerly a plan trustee, had resigned, leaving no party in interest in the proposed sale on the supplied facts. It concluded the purchase was not prohibited under section 406(a) and no section 408(a) exemption was needed.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
P/OPINION 76-102
Date issued
February 19, 1976
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
P/OPINION    76-102

                                                 406(a)

                      February 19, 1976



Dear           :

This is in reply to your exemption request of July 9, 1975
and supplemental material dated November 14, 1975.

We have carefully reviewed the information which you
provided. You have indicated the following: The land
that the plan wishes to purchase was owned at one time by
the (named) Corporation, a participating employer. A
purchase by the plan at that time would have been a
prohibited transaction. When the sole shareholder of that
corporation, Mr. (x) died, the corporation was dissolved
and the freehold interest passed to the estate of Mr. (x}.
A potential prohibited transaction remained, however,
since one of the executors of Mr. (x)'s estate was
Mr. (y), a trustee of the plan and, therefore, a party-
in-interest. Mr. (y) subsequently resigned his
trusteeship, and, thus, no party-in-interest is now
present.

Based on the above information, the Department considers
the proposed purchase of the land from the estate of Mr. (x)
not to be a prohibited transaction under section 406(a) of
ERISA. Accordingly, a 408(a) exemption is not required.

Should you have any further questions, please contact the
Division of Exemptions, Variances, and Determinations,
Room N-4716, Washington, D.C. 20216,


Sincerely,

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace