Back to Federal guidance
Insured welfare plans and fiduciary duties
Summary A correspondent raised reporting burdens and fiduciary concerns for insured welfare plans. DOL described then limited reporting and disclosure relief for qualifying small plans, including timely remittance of employee premiums. It also said state-regulated insurance contracts need not be held in trust under section 403(b)(1), while the person holding them remained a fiduciary subject to care and control duties.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
P/OPINION 75-86
Date issued
August 29, 1975
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026
Topics
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
P/OPINION 75-86
403(b)(1)
August 29, 1975
Dear :
This is in reply to your letter dated July 11, 1975,
forwarding comments from of
covering reporting requirements for insured welfare
plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA). He is also concerned about the
liability of being a fiduciary under this Act.
The Department of Labor is making every effort to
reduce the reporting and disclosure burdens to the
extent feasible. For example, on August 15, 1975,
the Department published regulations in the Federal
Register whereunder employee welfare benefit plans
which cover fewer than 100 participants at all times
during a plan year are exempt from certain reporting
and disclosure provisions if the benefits are provided
solely from the general assets of the employer or employee
organization maintaining the plan or if the benefits
are provided exclusively through insurance contracts
or policies, the premiums for which are paid directly
by the employer or employee organization from its
general assets. This exemption also applies to plans
where employees (or members of labor organizations)
contribute to insurance premiums, but only if the
employee or member contributions are forwarded
to the insuring organization within three months
after they are made.
Regarding 's comment about "open ended"
liability of being a fiduciary, I think he is over-reacting
to the fiduciary provisions of ERISA. Health and life
insurance plans funded through insurance carriers are
relatively simple plans to operate within the fiduciary
provisions. ERISA section 403(b)(1) takes this into
account by providing an exemption from the requirement
of establishing a trust for any assets of a plan which
consist of insurance contracts or policies issued by
a state-regulated insurance company. A comment on
this provision is made in the Conference Report
(H.R. Report No. 93-1280) on ERISA at the bottom of
page 298 as follows:
2
P/OPINION 75-86
Although these contracts need not
be held in trust, nevertheless, the
person who holds the contract is to
be a fiduciary and is to act in
accordance with the fiduciary rules
of the substitute with respect to these
contracts. For example, this person
is to prudently take and keep exclusive
control of the contracts, and is to use
prudent care and skill to preserve this
property.
Hopefully, 's counsel will advise that
it is not reasonable to terminate the plan because
of ERISA.
Your correspondence is returned herewith.
Sincerely,
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace