Back to Federal guidance
Participant direction and fiduciary liability under ERISA
Summary A requester asked whether participant-directed individual account transactions were exempt from ERISA. DOL said section 404(c) did not exempt all such transactions; it limited fiduciary liability for losses or breaches resulting from a participant’s exercise of control and did not make the participant a fiduciary for that reason alone. DOL referred the separate excise-tax question to IRS.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
P/OPINION 75-81
Date issued
April 15, 1975
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026
Topics
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
P/OPINION 75-81
404
April 15, 1975
Dear :
This is in response to your letter of March 6, 1975, in which
you posed the following questions pertaining to the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974:
1. Does section 404(c) of the Act exempt all
"earmarked" transactions made in compliance
with the terms of an employee benefit plan?
(We assume that by the term "earmarked"
transactions you mean a transaction which
involves the exercise of control by a
participant or beneficiary over assets
in his account in an individual account
plan which permits such exercise of control).
2. Will the excise taxes of section 4975 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1954 be levied in
respect of a transaction which falls within
section 404(c) of the Act?
With regard to your first question, section 404(c) does
not provide a blanket exemption from all of the provisions
of the Act for transactions which involve an exercise of
control by a participant or beneficiary over the assets
in his or her own account in an individual account plan
which permits such exercise of control. However, section
404(c) does absolve plan fiduciaries of liability under
Part 4 of Title I "for any loss, or by reason of any
breach, which results from such participant's or beneficiary's
exercise of control." In addition, it provides that the
participant or beneficiary is not to be deemed a fiduciary
by reason of such exercise.
Your second question, relating to the imposition of excise
taxes imposed under section 4975 of the Code, is a matter
within the jurisdiction of the Internal Revenue Service.
Accordingly, your inquiries in that regard should be
addressed to the Internal Revenue Service.
Sincerely,
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace