Back to Federal guidance

Nonprofit school pension plan under ERISA

Summary A nonprofit school asked whether its contributory pension plan was covered. DOL said tax-exempt schools had no categorical Title I exclusion and a plan paying deferred income at termination met ERISA’s pension definition even without retirement-only payments. It concluded the described plan was subject to reporting and disclosure, while referring termination-insurance questions elsewhere.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
P/OPINION 75-44
Date issued
July 21, 1975
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
P/OPINION 75-44

                                                                   4(b)

                             July 21, 1975

Dear              :

This is in reply to your letter of January 14, 1975,
requesting information as to how the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) affects the pension
plan of a not-for-profit school. Participants and
employer both contribute 5% of the employee's earnings.
Benefits are payable on termination of employment and are not
restricted to retirement. I will answer your questions
sequentially.

          1.   Congressional power under the Commerce
               Clause has been found to cover educational
               and scientific activity carried on by
               non-profit institutions. For example,
               although the National Labor Relations
               Board declined to adjudicate on policy
               grounds in Trustees of Columbia University,
               97 NLRB 424 (1951), it found that " . . . the
               activities of Columbia University affect
               commerce sufficiently to satisfy the
               requirements of the (LMRA) . . ." 97 NLRB at 425.

          2.   Section 4(b) of the ERISA, which lists employee
               benefit plans to which Title I does not apply,
               makes no provision for schools that are wholly
               tax exempt.

          3.   Any questions relating to coverage of a plan
               under Title IV of ERISA, Plan Termination
               Insurance, should be addressed to the
               Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

          4.   Section 3(2) defines "an employee pension
               benefit plan" and "pension plan" as "any
               plan, fund, or program which was heretofore
               or is hereafter established or maintained
               by an employer or by an employee organization,
               or by both, to the extent that by its express
               terms or as a result of surrounding circumstances
               such plan, fund, or program

               A.     provides retirement income to employees or

               B.     results in a deferral of income by employees
                      for periods extending to the termination of
                      covered employment or beyond,
                      to the plan, the method of
                      calculating the benefits under the
2

P/OPINION 75-44

                  plan or the method of distributing
                  benefits from the plan". While the
                  pension plan you refer to does not
                  provide retirement income as specified
                  in (A), it does provide deferred
                  income distributed in a lump sum upon
                  termination of employment as specified
                  in (B). Therefore, the plan would not be
                  exempt from the disclosure and reporting
                  provisions.

          5.   At the present time simplified reporting is
               under consideration but no final determinations
               have been made.

          6.   I am enclosing a copy of the Plan Description
               Form EBS-1. The first two pages only plus
               the signature page, without supporting schedules,
               must be filed with the Department by August 31,
               1975. It has been proposed that the complete
               EBS-1 and the summary plan description be filed
               with the Department and the summary plan description
               furnished to plan participants and beneficiaries
               by May 30, 1976.

          7.   The first Annual Report is not due until 210 days
               after the end of the plan year beginning after
               December 30, 1974. The Welfare and Pension Plans
               Disclosure Act (WPPDA) Form D-2 remains in effect
               for plans subject to the WPPDA for plan years
               ending through and including December 30, 1975.

Sincerely,

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace