Back to Federal guidance

No participation-standard phase-in variance

Summary A requester sought a three- or four-year delay for a client facing ERISA’s minimum participation requirements. DOL distinguished its authority over certain vesting, accrual, funding, and disclosure matters from participation standards. It concluded that it could not grant the requested participation phase-in variance.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
P/OPINION 75-17
Date issued
December 17, 1975
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
P/OPINION 75-17


                                                                3(2)


                        December 17, 1975


Dear              :

This is in reply to your communication dated September 22,
1975, regarding an inquiry received by you from
                         . [He] states that he has a
client to whom the requirements of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act fo 1974 (ERISA) as they pertain to
inclusion of employees with just one year of service rather
than the present requirement of four will inflict a severe
hardship and almost certainly discontinue his retirement
program and inquires as to the requirements and possibilities
of obtaining a three or four year delay phasing in period
for his client in meeting the participation requirements of the
ERISA.

Although, under certain circumstances, the ERISA provides
the Secretary of Labor with authority to grant temporary
variances with respect to vesting and the accrual of benefits
(section 207); to extend the years required to amortize
any unfunded past service liability in the case of defined
benefit pension plans (section 304): and to prescribe an
alternative method of satisfying the reporting and disclosure
requirements for pension plans (section 110), the Secretary
of Labor has no authority to grant a variance with respect
to any pension plan, as defined in section 3(2), from the
participation standards.

Under the circumstances, it is not possible for the
Secretary of Labor to grant a three or four year phasing
in delay of the minimum participation standards as requested
by          on behalf of his client.

I hope this information will be helpful in replying to
              . As requested, your correspondence is
returned herewith.

Sincerely,

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace