Back to Federal guidance

Bond procurement through interested insurance agents

Summary An insurance agency sought relief in case plan bonds procured through related agents violated ERISA section 412(c). DOL said it could not grant an exemption from that prohibition and explained the then handling-based bonding standard. It lacked enough details about the agency-plan relationships to determine whether this specific arrangement violated the statute.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
P/OPINION 75-121
Date issued
July 1, 1975
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
P/OPINION 75-121


                                                              412

                             July 1, 1975

Dear             :

This is in response to your inquiry of December 30, 1974,
which was addressed to
and which has been referred to this Office for reply.

You state that          Insurance Agency, Inc. has obtained
bonding from either the           Life and Casualty Company
or The           Insurance Company for the fiduciaries of
qualified profit sharing and pension plans administered
by           Insurance Planning Agency, the partners
of which are the principal shareholders of the insurance
agency.

You request an exemption under section 412(e) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) in
the event the Department of Labor determines that the above
bonding arrangement is prohibited under the provisions of
section 412(c).

Section 412(c) provides as follows:

       "It shall be unlawful for any person to procure
       any bond required by subsection (a) from any surety
       or other company or through any agent or broker in
       whose business operations such plan or any party in
       interest in such plan has any control or significant
       financial interest, direct or indirect."

Congress definitely found danger of harmful results in the
situations described in section 412(c) so much so that it
forbade bonds contracted for under such circumstances.
Accordingly, an exemption may not be granted under section
412(a) from the prohibitions contained in section 412(c).

The Secretary has issued a temporary regulation (29 CFR
2555) which, pending issuance of a permanent bonding regulation
under section 412 of ERISA, incorporates by reference most
of the bonding regulations issued under the Welfare and
Pension Plans Disclosure Act (WPPDA) and makes them applicable
to plan officials under ERISA.

Pending the issuance of permanent regulations with respect
to Section 412, a fiduciary is not required to be bonded
unless he handles funds or other property of an employee
benefit plan. "Handling" occurs whenever the duties or
2


P/OPINION 75-121


activities of a plan official are such that there is
a risk that such funds or other property could be lost
in the event of fraud or dishonesty on the part of
such person, acting either alone or in collusion with
others.

Enclosed herewith is a compilation of regulations and
interpretive bulletins issued under the WPPDA. In
the absence of specific details concerning the relationship
between           Insurance Planning Agency and the various
plans it administers it is not possible to state that a
violation of section 412(c) does not exist. However, your
attention is directed to 29 CFR 485 of the enclosure,
particularly Example 1 under 485.4, which may have direct
application to your inquiry.

Sincerely,

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace