Back to Federal guidance

Employer insurance assistance exceeds group-plan exclusion

Summary DOL said the described employer involvement exceeded the limited, neutral role permitted by its group-insurance exclusion. Helping prepare claims, holding the contract in the employer’s name, and choosing coverage and insurer prevented the described programs from fitting that exclusion.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
P/OPINION 75-06
Date issued
November 3, 1975
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
P/OPINION 75-06


                                                                3(1)


                        November 3, 1975


Dear              :

This is a belated acknowledgment of your letter of June 23,
1975, concerning the exemption for certain group plans under
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. We
welcome comments from interested parties for consideration
in formulating regulations for the implementation of the Act.

Section 2510.3-1(1) of the final regulations issued in the
Federal Register of August 15, 1975, outlines the exemption
for “Certain group and group-type insurance programs”. It
embodies substantive changes from the section of the proposed
regulations to which you referred, but we were unable to make
the change in the basic requirement of employer neutrality
which you suggested. The absence of employer involvement
remains the key to the rationale for not treating this type
of program as an employee benefit.

The employer functions involved in the proposed plan you
described, assistance in preparation of claim forms and
receipt of the contract in the employer’s name, exceed
the limited employer involvement contemplated by the
exemption. The same is true for the existing program
you described, since the employer chose the coverage and
the insurance company, and helps employees file claims.

Sincerely,

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace