Back to Federal guidance
Collectively bargained vacation trust is an ERISA welfare plan
Summary DOL found the described jointly bargained vacation trust to be an ERISA welfare plan subject to reporting, disclosure, and fiduciary requirements. It said the parties could decide whether to continue, modify, or end the fund after considering the cost of compliance.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA)
Document number
P/OPINION 75-01
Date issued
January 22, 1975
Status
Unknown
EBSA's index does not mark withdrawn or superseded opinions; still posted on dol.gov as of 2026-10-26.
Status last verified October 26, 2026
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.
P/OPINION 75-01
3(1)
January 22, 1975
Dear :
This is in response to your letter of January 8, 1975.
concerning a letter received from one of your constituents,
, in regard to the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).
I have reviewed the documents submitted relating
to a collectively bargained vacation fund covering members
of his union Local Union . These documents
indicate that a joint employer-union trust fund has been
established to which employers pay nine percent of the
gross pay of employees working under the collective bargaining
agreement. The money transferred to the trust fund is
subject to all taxes and payroll deductions on the same
basis as take-home pay. The [employer] Association has
informed the Union that the vacation fund "as now operated"
would not comply with the terms of ERISA. The Association
indicated its intention to include vacation fund payments
in employees' weekly paychecks after December 31, 1974,
rather than sending them to the trust fund.
The vacation fund is an employee welfare benefit plan, as
defined in section 3(1) of ERISA. Under section 4(a),
the fund is covered by the provisions of Title I of ERISA.
This means that if the fund continues in operation, it must
comply with certain rules and requirements designed to protect
the interests of participants and beneficiaries. Reporting
and disclosure of basic facts about the plan and its operation
would have to be made, as provided in Part 1 of Title I. In
2
P/OPINION 75-01
general, the fiduciary duties of Part 4 of Title I would
also apply to the plan, requiring those with control
of assets to act prudently and for the exclusive benefit
of participants and beneficiaries, and prohibiting certain
types of transactions which the Congress found were subject
to abuse.
From the facts submitted, I find no reason to believe that
the Vacation Fund could not be brought into compliance
with ERISA. There would doubtless be some costs involved
in doing so. The final decision on whether to continue,
drop or modify the fund is therefore not a legal one, but
a practical matter for the parties to the collective bargaining
agreement.
A copy of ERISA is enclosed. If I may be of any further
assistance, please do not hesitate to write or call my
office.
Sincerely,
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace