When a private project becomes a public work mid-project via a financing agreement

STATE OF NEVADA
JOE LOMBARDO DR. KRISTOPHER SANCHEZ
Governor Director

                                                                                                                  BRETT HARRIS
                                                                                                                 Labor Commissioner




                           DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY
                     OFFICE OF THE LABOR COMMISSIONER
                                                      March 4, 2024

Brandon Sendall, Esq.
City of Sparks, City Attorney Office
431 Prater Way
P.O. Box 857
Sparks, Nevada 89432-0857

   Re: Request for Advisory Opinion—5 Ridges Prevailing Wage Compliance

Dear Mr. Sendall,

    Pursuant to Nevada Administrative Code ("NAC") Section 607.650, an Advisory Opinion

has been requested clarifying three matters relevant to the potential execution of a Development
and Financing Agreement ("DFA") for a portion of the 5 Ridges Development in Sparks, Nevada
(the "5 Ridges" project): (1) documentation relevant in investigating allegations of unpaid wages
when a project becomes a Public Works Project in the midst of the project due to a financing
change; (2) the applicable prevailing wage determination for the 5 Ridges project under NRS
338.030 if/when it becomes a Public Works Project; and (3) whether the Office of the Labor
Commissioner (the "OLC") is inclined to assess penalties, fees, or interest if the contractors on the
5 Ridges project make a back payment of prevailing wage wages in the event the project goes from
private to Public Works based on the execution of a DFA. As set forth in NAC 607.650, this
advisory opinion is limited to the facts and circumstances set forth in the request. This advisory
opinion shall not apply to any pending administrative, civil, or criminal proceeding and shall not
be relied upon by any party, whether a party at issue in the facts or not, in any future proceeding
unrelated to the specific and unique facts and circumstances set forth in the request.

   I.         RELEVANT DOCUMENTATION IN A WAGE COMPLAINT

    The first question presented in the Request for Advisory Opinion asked whether the

contractor's timecard records prior to the execution of the DFA would suffice in lieu of certified
payroll reports for purposes of evidencing and satisfying NRS 338 compliance requirements for
payment of prevailing wage and utilization of apprentices in the event of an NRS 338 investigation
on the 5 Ridges project. First, under the specific circumstances presented by the 5 Ridges project
and the Request for Advisory Opinion, the Office of the Labor Commissioner agrees with the
City's statement and interpretation that the work performed is/was not subject to NRS 338
requirements prior to public funds being pledged under a DFA (and no other applicable laws
compel the payment of prevailing wage under the facts and circumstances as presented and known).

    Carson City: 1818 E. College Parkway, Suite 102, Carson City, Nevada 89706 - Telephone (775) 684-1890 - Fax (775) 687-6409
          Las Vegas: 3340 W. Sahara Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 - Telephone (702) 486-2650 - Fax (702) 486-2660
                                       www.labor.nv.gov      [email protected]

Page 2

As such, until the 5 Ridges project secures/secured public funds, certified payroll reports are/were
not required under applicable law, including NAC 338.092, et seq. It would be impracticable, and
not feasible, to create and file certified payroll reports for hours worked in the past when there was:
(1) no such requirement; and (2) no public works project ("PWP") number to track or receive the
certified payroll reports. Because certified payroll reports were not required at the time the
applicable work at issue was performed, the lack of certified payroll reports would not form the
basis for a violation and would not be used as an adverse inference against the respondent.

    If the Office of the Labor Commissioner were to receive any other complaint under its

jurisdiction pursuant to NRS 338.010-338.130 regarding the 5 Ridges project, the OLC would
consider the contractor's timecards prior to the execution of the DFA, as applicable to the claim(s),
as well as any information gathered and set forth pursuant to NAC 338.110(3), and any other
information that could reasonably assist in evaluating whether a violation was committed, which
may include, but is not limited to: (1) time and attendance records; (2) check stubs; (3) employment
records as is the case in investigations for unpaid wages outside of the public works and prevailing
wage; (4) relevant business records as applicable; and/or (5) communications.

   II.        APPLICABLE PREVAILING WAGE DETERMINATION

    The second question posed in the Request for Advisory Opinion requested clarification on

the applicable prevailing wage determination for the 5 Ridges project in the event of the execution
of the DFA. Pursuant to NRS 338.030(9)(b):

   [i]f the contract for a public work…[i]s not to be awarded pursuant to a competitive
   bidding process…the prevailing rate of wages in effect on the date on which the
   contractor for the contract is selected by the awarding body must be paid until the
   completion or termination of the contract or for the 36 months immediately
   following the date on which the contractor was selected, whichever is earlier. If the
   contract is not entered into within 90 days after the date of the selection of the
   contractor, the prevailing rates of wages in effect on the date on which the contract
   is entered into must be paid until the completion or termination of the contract or
   for the 36 months immediately following the date on which the contract was entered
   into, whichever is earlier.

     Based on NRS 338.030(9)(b), the 2020-2021 Prevailing Wage Determination applies, in

this instance, to any contract entered between October 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021. Assuming
the applicable contract was entered into between those dates, the 2020-2021 Prevailing Wage
Determination would apply until the earlier of termination/completion of the project, or 36 months
from the date the contract was entered, as stated in NRS 338.030(9). Although not stated in the
Request for Advisory Opinion, the Office of the Labor Commissioner is informed and believes
that the applicable contract was entered in February 2021, and therefore, the 2020-2021 Prevailing
Wage Determination would apply until February 2024, or termination, if terminated before that
date. As such, if the 5 Ridges project becomes a Public Works Project, any work performed more
than 36 months from the execution of the original contract in February 2021, would be subject to
the 2023-2024 Prevailing Wage Determination, while work performed prior to the expiration of
36 months would be subject to the 2020-2021 Prevailing Wage Determination in effect at the time
of the applicable contract.

   III.       PENALTIES, FEES, OR INTEREST

    Carson City: 1818 E. College Parkway, Suite 102, Carson City, Nevada 89706 - Telephone (775) 684-1890 - Fax (775) 687-6409
          Las Vegas: 3340 W. Sahara Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 - Telephone (702) 486-2650 - Fax (702) 486-2660
                                       www.labor.nv.gov      [email protected]

Page 3

    The third question in the Request for Advisory Opinion asked for clarification on whether

any penalties, fees, or interest must be paid in addition to backpay covering the difference in private
wages and the applicable prevailing wage rate if/when the 5 Ridges project becomes a Public
Works Project. As stated above, the Office of the Labor Commissioner agrees with the City's
statement and interpretation that work performed prior to the execution of a DFA is/was not subject
to NRS 338 prevailing wage, certified payroll reporting, and apprentice utilization requirements
because public funds were not yet pledged (and no other applicable laws compel the payment of
prevailing wage under the facts and circumstances as presented and known). Any applicable
prevailing wages are/were not due or owed to employees unless and until a corresponding
requirement in law is/was triggered.

    As stated in the Request for Advisory Opinion, the developer stated an intent, through the

contractor, to provide backpay to all workers who were not paid prevailing wage. Because
prevailing wages were not required to be paid at the time the work was performed, it was not a
violation of law if the employee was not paid such prevailing wages at that time (assuming other
wage laws were complied with), and therefore, there is no violation to warrant any fines, penalties,
or other relief, including interest under NAC 607.065 or otherwise. Additionally, assuming the
developer, through the contractor, paid the applicable difference between the previously paid rate
and the applicable prevailing wage, the developer and/or contractor would be compliant with the
law, and therefore, no violation or resulting penalty, fee, or interest would be warranted. As it
applies here, the Office of the Labor Commissioner is informed and believes that such payments
have already been made to the applicable employees before any requirement to pay prevailing
wage has triggered. Accordingly, there would be no violation or resulting penalties, fees, or interest
for wages that were paid before they became due.

    Please be advised that this Advisory Opinion is limited to the specific facts and

circumstances described herein. The Office of the Labor Commissioner may revisit this issue
through the Administrative Rulemaking Process. Please be further advised that subsequent
statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretation of the statutes or rules upon which
any opinion is based may require modification or abandonment of this Advisory Opinion.

    Thank you for reaching out to the Office of the Labor Commissioner with your questions.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide information and education regarding Nevada labor laws,
and their application. Should you need any additional clarification, please do not hesitate to contact
our office at (702) 486-4650.

Sincerely,

Brett K. Harris
Labor Commissioner

    Carson City: 1818 E. College Parkway, Suite 102, Carson City, Nevada 89706 - Telephone (775) 684-1890 - Fax (775) 687-6409
          Las Vegas: 3340 W. Sahara Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 - Telephone (702) 486-2650 - Fax (702) 486-2660
                                       www.labor.nv.gov      [email protected]