MA Opinion Letter July 9, 2007 Active
Back to Massachusetts guidance

The three-hour reporting-pay rule doesn't apply to shifts scheduled under three hours

Summary: An employer asked DLS how the "three-hour rule" reporting-pay requirement applies to employees scheduled to work less than three hours. DLS explained the rule only guarantees at least three hours' pay when an employee scheduled for three-plus hours reports for duty but isn't given the expected work; if an employee is in good faith scheduled for under three hours and works only that time, the rule doesn't apply and the employer may pay for hours actually worked. Relevant to employers scheduling short shifts or meetings.

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ezel answers your specific situation, under current Massachusetts labor law, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Massachusetts Department of Labor Standards (DLS). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

Opinion Letter 07-09-07 - Reporting Pay Provision "Three Hour Rule"

July 9, 2007

I am writing in response to your request, on behalf of your client ***, for this Office's written opinion regarding
the applicability of the Massachusetts Minimum Fair Wage Law. Specifically, you have asked how 455 C.M.R.
§2.03(1), the Reporting Pay requirement, applies to employees scheduled to work less than three hours. [1]

The Reporting Pay provision, also known as the "three hour rule," provides:

When an employee who is scheduled to work three or more hours reports for duty at the time set by the
employer, and that employee is not provided with the expected hours of work, the employee shall be paid for at
least three hours on such day at no less than the basic minimum wage. [This provision] shall not apply to
organizations granted status as charitable organizations under the Internal Revenue Code.

455 C.M.R. §2.03(1). Therefore, if a for-profit employer schedules an employee for three or more hours, the
employee arrives at the worksite on time, and the employer does not provide the expected hours, the employee
must be paid for at least three hours at no less than the minimum wage ($7.50 per hour). Of course, for any
actual time worked, the employee must be paid his/her actual wage. For example, if an employee is told that a
meeting will take four hours, and the employee is sent home after two hours, the employee must be paid for two
hours at his/her regular rate of pay, and at least minimum wage for the third hour. [2]

Alternatively, if an employee is, in good faith, scheduled for less than three hours, the employer may pay the
employee for only the hours worked. For example, if an employee is scheduled for a two-hour meeting and
she/he works these two hours, the "three hour rule" is inapplicable, and the employer may pay the employee for
only the hours worked.

I hope this information has been helpful. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,
Lisa C. Price
Deputy General Counsel


Footnotes:

  1. As you know, most employers are also subject to the federal minimum wage and hour law, found in the Fair
    Labor Standards Act (FLSA), and regulations promulgated thereunder. For information about applicable federal
    wage and hour laws, you should contact the U.S. Department of Labor.
  2. Of course, if the meeting causes a non-exempt employee's hours to exceed 40 hours in the workweek, the
    employee must be paid time and one-half pay for all hours actually worked in excess of 40 hours.

***=Names have been Omitted

Get the answer for your situation

You just read Massachusetts's guidance on this. Ezel checks current Massachusetts labor law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.