CA Opinion Letter 1995.04.19 April 19, 1995 Active
Back to California guidance

Labor Commissioner will not entertain a wage claim duplicating an issue already in court

Summary: An attorney challenged DLSE's practice of refusing to let a worker pursue a wage claim before the Labor Commissioner on the same issues already raised in a court action, arguing that Labor Code section 218 lets a worker sue without first exhausting the Labor Commissioner's administrative process. DLSE agreed section 218 does not require exhausting administrative remedies before filing suit, but explained that is a separate question from allowing the same dispute to proceed simultaneously in both forums. Because an unappealed Labor Commissioner order, decision, or award becomes a judgment, letting the same issues proceed in both places risks two conflicting or duplicative judgments; to avoid that, the Labor Commissioner will not hear a claim already pending in court, and will dismiss a Labor Commissioner claim if the claimant separately sues in court for the same relief.

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ezel answers your specific situation, under current California labor law, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

PETE WILSON, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT
LEGAL SECTION
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Room 3166
San Francisco, CA 94102
(415) 703-4150

H. THOMAS CADELL, JR., Chief Counsel

April 19, 1995

W. Bartley Anderson
1030 East El Camino Real, Suite 295
Sunnyvale, CA 94087

Re: Jurisdiction of State Agency

Dear Mr. Anderson:

This is intended to respond to your letter of March 4, 1995, wherein you take issue with the position of the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement which precludes one from proceeding with a claim before the Labor Commissioner which covers the same issues raised in a court action.

The cases which you have cited in support of your contention that one may file a wage claim with the Labor Commissioner and file an action to recover those same wages with a Municipal court are inapposite. Each of the cases you cite address the situation where one has a common law claim and a statutory claim which are separate and the statutory claim may only be pursued in a civil action after exhaustion of the administrative remedy. As you point out, Labor Code § 218 specifically provides that one does not have to exhaust the administrative remedies available through the Labor Commissioner before filing an action in court.

As to the rationale for the rule adopted by the Labor Commissioner, your attention is directed to the fact that under the Labor Code the Labor Commissioner exercises quasi-judicial authority. (See Labor Code § 98(a) et seq.) A claim filed with the Labor Commissioner may be sent to a hearing; the result of that hearing (an order, decision or award) will, unless appealed by either party, become a judgment. Thus, it would be possible for the parties to have two conflicting judgments or two concurrent judgments covering the same issues and facts. Obviously, this would lead to chaos.

In order to avoid chaos the Labor Commissioner will not entertain claims which are already before the courts or, in the event the claimant files an action in the courts seeking the same remedies as those sought in the claim before the Labor Commissioner, the Labor Commissioner will dismiss the claim.

Page 2

W. Bartley Anderson
April 19, 1995
Page 2

I hope this adequately explains the position of the Labor Commissioner's office in this regard.

Yours truly,

H. THOMAS CADELL, JR.
Chief Counsel

c.c. Nance Steffen
Frank Padres

Get the answer for your situation

You just read California's guidance on this. Ezel checks current California labor law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.