CA Opinion Letter 1994.03.03 March 3, 1994 Active
Back to California guidance

Paying exempt employees extra for hours beyond 10 in a day doesn't jeopardize their exempt status

Summary: A company's chief operations officer asked whether paying exempt employees for hours worked in excess of 10 in a day would jeopardize their exempt status under the California Industrial Welfare Commission Orders. DLSE answered no: as long as the other conditions for exemption are otherwise met, adding compensation for extra hours (whether or not it's called overtime premium) does not itself defeat the exemption. DLSE noted it was not opining on whether these particular workers are actually exempt, nor on any separate liability under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act.

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ezel answers your specific situation, under current California labor law, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA PETE WILSON, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT
LEGAL SECTION
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Room 3166
San Francisco, CA 94102
(415) 703-4150

H. THOMAS CADELL, JR., Chief Counsel

March 3, 1994

Daniel H. Birman
Chief Operations Officer
GSi/water
520 Mission St.
South Pasadena, CA 91030

Re: Payment of Compensation To Exempt Employees

Dear Mr. Birman:

This letter is intended to respond to your letter of February 18, 1994, wherein you ask whether paying exempt employees for hours in excess of 10 hours in a day would jeopardize the exempt status of the employees. The answer is no.

This letter does not address whether the workers are or are not exempt; it simply addresses the question of whether the payment of added compensation (whether denominated overtime premium or by some other name) would affect the exempt status of the employee for purposes of the California Industrial Welfare Commission Orders so long as all the other conditions for exemption are met. This letter also does not address any liability such practices might entail under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Yours truly,

H. THOMAS CADELL, JR.
Chief Counsel

c.c. Victoria Bradshaw, State Labor Commissioner

                                                                      1994.03.03

Get the answer for your situation

You just read California's guidance on this. Ezel checks current California labor law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.