CA Opinion Letter 1992.02.28 February 28, 1992 Active
Back to California guidance

Part-time hospital nurses with a schedule distinct from full-time nurses can form a separate 'identifiable work unit' eligible for its own alternative workweek

Summary: A hospital's counsel asked DLSE whether full-time and part-time nurses working the same department and shifts, but differing in scheduled hours and benefits, could be treated as separate groups for purposes of adopting an alternative workweek schedule. DLSE explained that if the part-time nurses work a "regularly scheduled" workweek that differs from the full-time nurses' normal workweek, the part-time group constitutes a "readily identifiable work unit" and can independently opt into an alternative workweek. This matters to employers, especially healthcare employers, structuring alternative workweek elections around shift or staffing distinctions rather than department-wide votes.

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ezel answers your specific situation, under current California labor law, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA PETE WILSON, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
Legal Section
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Room 3166
San Francisco, CA 94102

February 28, 1992

William D. Claster, Esq.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
800 Newport Center Drive
P.O. Box 2490
Newport Beach, CA 92660-6395

Re: Identifiable Work Unit

Dear Mr. Claster:

The Labor Commissioner has asked me to respond to your letter of January 29, 1992, regarding the following fact situation which you set out in your letter:

The hospitals in question have both full-time and part-time nurses working in the same departments on the same shifts. The difference between the two groups of employees is that the full-time employees work more shifts and hours each week, and are provided full benefits as a result of their full-time status. The scheduled part-time employees work regularly scheduled shifts each week, but not as many as the full-time employees, and also do not receive paid benefits like their full-time counterparts.

Your question is whether there exists a distinction between the two groups of employees sufficient to consider them to be a "recognized subdivision of...the work unit"?

We assume at this point that neither group has opted for an alternative workweek schedule; but that such a schedule is being considered. In regard to this, we should like to point out that in order to qualify for the alternative workweek, the part-time nurses must be engaged for a "regularly scheduled" workweek.

If such regularly scheduled workweek differs from the normal workweek of the full-time nurses, the part-time workers would constitute a "readily identifiable work unit". The part-time nurses could, therefore, opt for an alternative workweek.

I hope this adequately addresses the question you raised in your January 29th letter. Please excuse the delay in responding but the workload of the office has caused a slight delay in answering our correspondence.

Yours truly,

H. THOMAS CADELL, JR.
Chief Counsel

c.c. Victoria Bradshaw
James Curry
Simon Reyes
Jose Millan

Get the answer for your situation

You just read California's guidance on this. Ezel checks current California labor law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.