CA Opinion Letter 1985.02.14 February 14, 1985 Active
Back to California guidance

California IWC Orders apply to a business on federal National Forest land

Summary: A resort marina's regional accounting manager asked DLSE whether the business must comply with the California Industrial Welfare Commission Orders given its location on federal National Forest land. DLSE answered yes: the Fair Labor Standards Act requires employers to follow whichever of federal or state law is stricter, and California's IWC Orders provide more protection than the FLSA. DLSE cited 16 U.S.C. Section 480 and United States v. County of Fresno (1977) for the principle that federal ownership of national forest land does not strip California of jurisdiction to enforce its labor laws there.

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ezel answers your specific situation, under current California labor law, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN Governor

DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT 1985.02.14
525 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94102
ADDRESS REPLY TO
P.O. BOX 603
San Francisco, CA 94102

              February 14, 1985                                       IN REPLY REFER TO

Donald G. Walters
Regional Accounting Manager
Play Mate Resort Marinas
10300 Bridge Bay Road
Redding, CA 96003

Re: Applicability of IWC Orders on Federal Property

Dear Sir:

Mr. Albert Reyff, Chief Deputy Labor Commissioner, has asked me to respond to your correspondence of February 6, 1985, which asks for a ruling on whether or not your firm must meet the requirements of the California Industrial Welfare Commission Orders.

The answer is yes.

In the first place, the Fair Labor Standards Act provides that an employer must meet the obligations of that Act or any state law on the subject, whichever is the more strict. The California IWC Orders provide far more benefits to the employee than does the FLSA. For that reason, the overtime requirements of the IWC Orders must be followed. The excerpt you attach would only be applicable in states which have not adopted minimum wage and overtime requirements as strict as the FLSA.

I attach hereto a copy of 16 USC §480 which is self-explanatory. The fact that you have a business situated on Federal National Forest land does not deprive the State of California of jurisdiction to enforce its laws, nor absolve your firm of its obligations under those laws.

The United States Supreme Court in the case of United States v. County of Fresno (1977) 97 S.Ct. 699, stated:

"Pursuant to 16 USC § 480, the States retain civil and criminal jurisdiction over the national forests notwithstanding the fact that the national forests are owned by the Federal Government."


Page 2

Donald G. Walters

I hope this adequately sets out the laws on the subject. If you have any further questions, please feel free to call.

Very truly yours,

H. THOMAS CADELL, JR.
Senior Counsel

c.c. Al Reyff
plymt

Get the answer for your situation

You just read California's guidance on this. Ezel checks current California labor law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.