Dwane L. Tinsley

“MEMORANDUM OPINION: Granting Plaintiff's 13 Brief In Support of Judgment on the Pleadings; denying Defendant's 14 Brief In Support of Judgment on the Pleadings; directing that this matter is reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) and this matter is dismissed from the docket of this Court.”

“MEMORANDUM OPINION denying Plaintiff's 11 Brief in Support of Judgment on the Pleadings; granting Defendant's 12 Brief in Support of Defendant's Decision; affirming the final decision of the Commissioner and dismissing this matter from the docket of this Court.”

“MEMORANDUM OPINION granting Plaintiff's 11 Brief in Support of Judgment on the Pleadings to the extent Claimant seeks remand; denying Defendant's 14 Brief in Support of Judgment on the Pleadings; remanding the final decision of the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g); and dismissing this matter from this Court's docket.”

“MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying without prejudice defendant's 3 Motion to Dismiss; the plaintiff is granted leave to file an Amended Complaint in an attempt to cure the deficiencies addressed more fully herein.”

“MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing the defendant's 14 Renewed Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and the Amended Complaint and this civil action are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice; the plaintiff's 16 Letter-Form Motion for Hearing is DENIED.”

“ORDER granting in part 37 MOTION by Carole Brender in Limine to Prohibit Photographs by the defendant that do not accurately depict the incident scene; the plaintiff also requested an adverse instruction for spoliation of evidence regarding defendant's intentional conduct in spoliating the evidence of the hidden tripping hazard; the Court reserves ruling on plaintiff's motion until trial.”

“granting Defendant's 40 OMNIBUS MOTIONS in Limine.”

“ORDER denying 33 MOTION by Fruth Pharmacy, Inc. for Summary Judgment.”

“ORDER granting 17 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Briefing Deadlines; the parties to have 30 days in which to conclude settlement negotiations and as set forth more fully herein; denying as moot the United States' 18 REQUEST for Entry of Default of Lucinda L. Eaton; granting 23 JOINT MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint as to the State of West Virginia.”

“Before this Court is the Government's motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 70.) For the reasons explained more fully herein, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. ... the Eatons' tax liabilities are not dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. Section 523(a)(1)(C) as to Mr. Eaton, but there is a question of fact as to whether those liabilities are dischargeable as to Ms. Eaton.”

“This matter is before this Court following a bench trial held on May 22, 2020, as to the issue of whether Defendant Lucinda L. Eaton's federal tax liabilities for tax year 2006 are excepted from discharge in her bankruptcy proceedings pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 523(a)(1)(C). For the reasons explained more fully herein, this Court FINDS that they are not so excepted.”

“Before this Court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 22, 23.) For the reasons explained more fully herein, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 22) is DENIED.”

“Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED.”

“Before this Court is Truist's motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 39.) For the reasons explained more fully herein, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”