Benjamin Franklin Moore

United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia district Deceased · served 1941–1958 Appointed by Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge Moore no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Moore decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Moore read wage-and-hour coverage broadly and treated exemptions as provisions to be construed narrowly.

“The Fair Labor Standards Act is remedial in its nature and should be liberally construed, and the exceptions to the coverage of the Act should be narrowly construed”

Moore rejected a wartime criminal regulation when the charged conduct exceeded the authority Congress had delegated to the executive branch.

“Congress and not the Executive is the source of the power”

Procedural preferences

Moore allowed equitable tax relief when the complaint alleged exceptional circumstances and no adequate legal remedy.

“The complaint in this case alleges facts bringing plaintiffs’ action within the scope of recognized equitable jurisdiction.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Spangler
· 1950-11-06
Claim to condemnation proceeds (former wife) Granted

“Mrs. W. W. Hughes will be paid $363 of the $1,650 now held in the registry of the court. The remaining $1,287 will be paid to R. H. Hughes.”

Blankenship v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
· 1946-08-10
Motions to dismiss (telegraph company) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the motion to dismiss the complaint will be sustained. An order may be entered in accordance herewith.”

Barnhart v. Jones
· 1949-09-27
Motion to disallow costs (defendants) Granted

“For the above reasons, defendants’ motions for disallowance of certain costs will be sustained.”

United States v. Green
· 1958-09-12
Government repayment claim (United States) Granted

“Since, as I have said, she acquired no rights as principal beneficiary by listing herself as such in the applications for renewal, it follows that plaintiff is entitled to recover from defendant the sum-of $9,043.98, that being the amount erroneously paid to her, together with interest thereon from the 14th day of December 1954, until paid.”

Mazzella v. Yoke
· 1947-02-06
Motions to dismiss (tax collector) Denied

“Therefore, defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and to dissolve the temporary restraining order for lack of jurisdiction is denied.”

Rigney v. Wilson & Co.
· 1945-07-11
Statutory wage claim (employee) Granted

“Applying the foregoing method of calculation to a schedule of overtime hours, which is not set out here because of its complexity but which the parties have agreed is correct, the plaintiff is entitled in this action to recover the sum of $132.76 as unpaid overtime compensation, and an additional amount of $132.76 as liquidated damages.”

United States v. City of Charleston
· 1950-05-18
Crossclaim for recovery (certificate holder) Denied

“For the above reasons the cross-claim of Haynes is dismissed.”

United States v. Strontium Products Co.
· 1947-04-10
Summary judgment (United States) Granted

“Plaintiff’s motion for a summary judgment is granted against defendant Strontium Products Company, a partnership, and against each individual defendant, jointly and severally for the sum of $735,000, with interest from August 7, 1945, until paid, at the rate of six per cent per annum with costs.”

Porter v. City of Charleston
· 1946-03-26
Request for injunction (federal administrator) Denied

“Therefore, the injunction is refused. An order may be entered in accordance with the foregoing opinion.”

Vaden v. Raleigh County Bank
· 1946-05-27
Statutory wage claim (employee) Denied

“An order may be presented for entry dismissing plaintiff’s complaint.”

United States v. Leccony Smokeless Fuel Co.
· 1946-01-25
Motion for judgment on pleadings (United States) Granted

“Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is therefore granted and an order may be prepared for entry in accordance with this opinion.”

Columbian Fuel Corp. v. Warfield Natural Gas Co.
· 1947-03-01
Motions to dismiss (gas purchaser) Denied

“The motions to dismiss the complaints will be denied. '”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No assigned electronic docket sample was available for a historical caseload description.

A historical record

Judge Moore no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.