Thomas S. Utschig

How Judge Utschig rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Utschig no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2012
Served
1986–2012
Commissioned
1986
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Utschig decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Recording law places the risk of defective perfection on sophisticated secured parties rather than innocent subsequent purchasers.

“Lenders - like the bank - are fully capable of protecting their interests by properly recording them.”

Procedural preferences

Venue follows practical administration when transfer clearly improves efficiency for the estate and participants.

“If a transfer would clearly make the administration of the case more efficient for all concerned, the debtor’s initial selection of the forum cannot be the controlling factor.”

Cautions

Lawful exemption planning becomes problematic only when accompanied by deceptive conduct that actually delays or misleads creditors.

“there is a difference between creating a smokescreen that makes it difficult for creditors to realize on their claims and merely attempting to take advantage of legally available exemptions.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Seelen v. Couillard and Bank of America (In re Couillard)
12-11610-7 / 12-0132 · 2012-12-06
Summary judgment (chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“The trustee’s oral motion for summary judgment on this issue shall be granted”

Cirilli v. Bronk (In re Bronk)
09-15224-7 / 10-44 · 2012-11-29
Objection to exemption (chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“The trustee’s objection to the exemption is overruled”

Seelen v. Couillard and Bank of America (In re Couillard)
12-11610-7 / 12-0132 · 2012-11-19
Summary judgment (Bank of America) Denied

“the bank’s motion for summary judgment must be denied”

Motion for relief from automatic stay (Bank of America) Denied

“the Court can find no present cause to lift the stay”

Objection to exemption (chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“This objection will be sustained”

In re Haake
12-11398-11 · 2012-09-18
Motion for relief from automatic stay (contract-for-deed creditor) Granted

“Mr. Rasmussen’s motion for relief from the automatic stay is granted”

Motion to determine adequate protection (debtor) Moot / procedural

“the debtor’s motion to determine adequate protection is denied as moot”

Hoffman v. Hartley (In re Hartley)
11-13956-7 / 12-0050 · 2012-09-11
Trustee complaint to reallocate mortgage (chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“The complaint must be dismissed”

White v. Coyne, Schultz, Becker & Bauer, S.C. (In re Pawlak)
10-11787-7 / 12-0036 · 2012-08-29
Summary judgment (chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“the trustee cannot avoid the transfer under § 548”

Summary judgment (defendant law firm) Granted

“the Pawlaks received ‘reasonably equivalent value’ for the transfer they made to the defendant”

In re Woller
11-14298-7 · 2012-08-16
Objection to exemption (chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“the trustee’s objection is denied as to the exemption of the semi-tractor”

Objection to exemption (chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“the trustee’s objection is denied as to the exemption of the semi-tractor, the net income from Darrell’s trucking services”

Objection to exemption (chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“the trustee’s objection is denied as to the exemption of the semi-tractor, the net income from Darrell’s trucking services, and the annuity”

Objection to exemption (chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“The objection is sustained as to the business account”

Pulaski v. Dakota Financial, LLC (In re Pulaski)
11-14135-13 / 11-0282 · 2012-07-13

The decision directed the unresolved claims to trial and did not resolve their merits.

In re Mississippi Sports and Recreation, Inc.
10-17601-11 · 2012-06-08
Motion to dismiss chapter 11 case (Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources) Denied

“the DNR’s motion to dismiss is denied”

In re Thulis
10-16841-7 · 2012-06-04
Objection to secured claim (chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“the trustee’s objection to the bank’s secured claim is sustained”

In re Palmer Lake Plaza, LLC
12-11183-11 · 2012-04-16
Motion to transfer venue (secured creditor) Granted

“the motion to transfer this case to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota is granted”

Motion to dismiss chapter 11 case (secured creditor) Moot / procedural

“the Court declines to rule on the creditor’s motion to dismiss the case”

Amundson v. Slaton (In re Slaton)
10-10704-13 / 10-0120 · 2012-04-06
Request to determine debt nondischargeable under 523a2 (investors) Denied

“the Court cannot find that he had the required intent to deceive them”

Request to determine debt nondischargeable under 523a4 (investors) Denied

“the debt cannot be excepted from discharge under this section of the code”

Request to determine debt nondischargeable under 523a6 (investors) Denied

“his conduct was neither ‘willful’ nor ‘malicious’ within the meaning of the bankruptcy code”

Unjust enrichment claim (investors) Granted

“the plaintiffs have proven their claim for unjust enrichment and they are entitled to the net proceeds of the sale of the building”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All ten sampled matters were terminated and every entry stream was empty.

A historical record

Judge Utschig no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.