Kenneth Philip Grubb

How Judge Grubb rules, drawn from 23 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Grubb no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Position
District judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1955–1965
Appointed by
Dwight D. Eisenhower (Republican)
Commissioned
June 16, 1955
Education
University of Wisconsin Law School, LL.B., 1921
Signed orders read
23

About Judge Grubb

Kenneth Philip Grubb was a judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Appointed by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, Judge Grubb received a commission on June 16, 1955. Judge Grubb retired on October 8, 1965.

How Judge Grubb decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Grubb required concrete evidence before disregarding separate corporate identities.

“There remains no issue of material fact as to the basis of liability of Alcoa.”

Procedural preferences

Grubb placed the burden of establishing a contested jurisdictional amount on the removing defendant.

“Defendant has failed to meet its burden of establishing the contested jurisdictional amount in this case.”

Cautions

Grubb treated others’ similar misconduct as irrelevant to whether the defendant committed the charged offense.

“The fact that other persons are immoral or sell obscene books, or that other persons in the community may be dishonest, negligent, or guilty of any fault which is in question on a trial, does not in the court’s opinion exonerate a defendant from similar charges.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Biami
· 1965-08-06
Motion to dismiss indictment (defendant) Denied

“The motion to dismiss the indictment must be and it is hereby denied.”

Guthrie v. United States
· 1965-03-15
Motions to dismiss (insurer) Granted

“The motion to dismiss is hex-eby granted and the action is dismissed as against defendant, Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance Co.”

United States v. Bishop
· 1961-02-17
Motion for rehearing (United States) Denied

“The motion for rehearing is hereby denied.”

Forest Laboratories, Inc. v. La Maur, Inc.
· 1965-01-05
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“The motion. *577to remand must be and it is hereby-granted.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“defendant’s motion to dismiss is hereby denied without prejudice.”

Sylvester v. Jacobsen Manufacturing Co.
· 1963-05-21
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“the motion of defendant, Jacobsen Manufacturing Company, for dismissal of the complaint must be and it is hereby denied.”

Rosenberg v. Platt
· 1964-05-11
Motion to release attachment (defendant) Denied

“the motion to release the attachment is hereby denied.”

Motion to increase bond (defendant) Denied

“the motion to increase the bond is hereby denied.”

United States v. One 1963 Cadillac Hardtop
· 1963-08-29
Objection to suppression motion (United States) Denied

“The libelant’s objection to the bringing of the motion must be and it is hereby denied.”

Pavek v. Ranchers Fur Auctions
· 1963-03-18
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“Counsel for plaintiff is hereby directed to prepare an order granting its motion to remand in accordance with the foregoing decision”

Grummitt v. Sturgeon Bay Winter Sports Club of Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin
· 1963-07-31
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as against the plaintiff must be and it is hereby denied.”

Architectural Building Products, Inc. v. Cupples Products Corp.
· 1963-09-10
Summary judgment (Aluminum Company of America) Granted

“Alcoa’s motion for summary judgment must be and it is hereby granted.”

Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. United States
· 1965-06-03
Administrative review claim (plaintiff) Denied

“the complaint in this action must be and hereby is dismissed.”

Imperial Appliance Corp. v. Hamilton Manufacturing Co.
· 1965-03-19
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“defendant’s motion for summary judgment must be, and it is hereby denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No assigned docket records were returned for Grubb’s tenure, so no caseload mix or case-duration summary is available.

A historical record

Judge Grubb no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.