James Graham Jenkins

How Judge Jenkins rules, drawn from 3 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Jenkins no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1888–1921
Appointed by
Grover Cleveland (Democratic)
Commissioned
1888-07-02
Education
Read law, 1855
Signed orders read
3

How Judge Jenkins decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In the reviewed collision case, the overtaking vessel remained responsible for keeping clear until it had completely passed the leading vessel.

“She retained that character until she had completely-passed the Spaulding.”

Procedural preferences

The court read restrictions in bills of lading narrowly and required a carrier seeking to limit established maritime obligations to use clear and decisive language.

“these terms of limitation and restriction must be expressed clearly and decisively, that parties may know the terms of their contract.”

Cautions

A secret rebate arrangement intended to inflate a general-average claim was denied enforcement because the certified bill furthered the parties' improper agreement.

“Such contracts will not be tolerated in courts of justice.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Hamilton & Merryman Co. v. Smith
· 1892-05-16

After trying the admiralty collision claim, the court held the overtaking tug responsible and dismissed the claim against the other tug.

Union Marine Insurance v. The Roanoke
· 1892-12-12

On agreed facts, the court held that the bills of lading did not exempt the vessel from general-average contribution for cargo sacrificed to save ship and cargo.

Leathem v. The Roanoke
· 1892-05-16

The court awarded contractual compensation for maritime pumping services while refusing to enforce a fraudulent rebate arrangement intended to inflate a general-average charge.

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No matching historical assigned-case cohort was located, so this record makes no claim about the judge's district-era caseload mix.

A historical record

Judge Jenkins no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.