Rachel M. Blise

How Judge Blise rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Position
bankruptcy
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Commissioned
2020-03-17
Signed orders read
19

How Judge Blise decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Summary judgment was unavailable where factual disputes remained about fraudulent intent and the portion of the debt actually obtained by fraud.

“With respect to the Lee Parties’ nondischargeability claim under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), there are disputed questions of fact as to the intent element and the amount of money allegedly obtained by fraud.”

Procedural preferences

A professional seeking to backdate employment must establish excusable neglect for failing to apply before performing the work.

“The debtor must therefore demonstrate ‘excusable neglect’ – something more than simple neglect but less than extraordinary circumstances – to justify employment of counsel with an effective date that is before the date an application under § 327(a) is filed.”

Cautions

A confirmed plan's factual findings can foreclose a later request that depends on contradicting those findings without a valid basis to reopen them.

“Those findings are res judicata, and the UST has not presented any basis for the Court to revisit them.”

Administrative-priority requests must show both a transaction with the estate and a demonstrable benefit to the estate.

“To qualify as an administrative expense under that section, an expense must both (1) arise from a transaction with the estate, and (2) benefit the estate in some demonstrable way.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Lee v. Hang (In re Hang)
24-23470-rmb; 24-2130-rmb · 2026-03-31
Motion for leave to amend complaint (Long Lee and co-plaintiffs) Denied

“The Lee Parties’ motion for leave to amend the complaint (ECF 29) is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (Long Lee and co-plaintiffs) Denied

“The motions for summary judgment filed by the Lee Parties (ECF 21) and the Debtors (ECF 26) are DENIED.”

Summary judgment (Mailee Hang and Vang Tou Hang) Denied
Lee v. Herr (In re Herr)
25-22893-rmb; 25-2101-rmb · 2026-08-06
Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (Candie Yer Herr and Eric Zooves Herr) Granted in part

“The motion to dismiss is granted in part.”

In re Kimble
25-25616-rmb · 2026-07-31
Motion for allowance of administrative expense (Hilltop Management Services LLC) Denied

“Hilltop Management LLC’s motion for allowance of administrative expense (Dkt. No. 78) is DENIED.”

Lee v. Vang (In re Vang)
24-24067-rmb; 24-2153-rmb · 2026-03-31
Motion for leave to amend complaint (Long Lee and co-plaintiffs) Denied

“The Lee Parties’ motion for leave to amend the complaint (ECF 32) is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (Mai L. Vang and Ue Yang) Granted

“The Debtors’ motion for summary judgment as to the Lee Parties’ claim for a declaration that the Debtors cannot claim a homestead exemption in bankruptcy is GRANTED and that claim is dismissed with prejudice.”

Summary judgment (Long Lee and co-plaintiffs) Denied

“The motions for summary judgment filed by the Lee Parties and the Debtors with respect to the Lee Parties’ claim for declaration of nondischargeability under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) are DENIED.”

Summary judgment (Mai L. Vang and Ue Yang) Denied
Ahmed v. Pathan (In re Pathan)
24-23022-rmb; 24-2116-rmb · 2026-03-27
Nondischargeability claim (Waseem Ahmed) Granted in part

“Of the $100,000 loan, Pathan used only $47,112.57 for personal expenses. The Court will grant Ahmed’s request for a declaration of nondischargeability as to that portion of the debt.”

In re Russ's Mulch & Trucking LLC
25-25134-rmb · 2025-12-11
Application to employ professional (Russ's Mulch & Trucking LLC) Granted in part

“The Court will grant the application to employ but will not make the employment retroactive.”

In re Kahle
24-20054-rmb · 2025-09-30
Objection to proof of claim (chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“the Trustee’s objection to Claim No. 18 is SUSTAINED and the claim is DISALLOWED in its entirety.”

Ramirez v. Knight (In re Knight)
24-22327-rmb; 24-2105-rmb · 2025-09-23
Nondischargeability claim (Markos Ramirez) Denied

“Therefore, the Court will deny Ramirez’s request for a declaration of nondischargeability.”

Toscano v. Kahle (In re Kahle)
24-20054-rmb; 24-2078-rmb · 2025-08-22
Summary judgment (Jeffrey J. Kahle) Denied

“The Court therefore denies Kahle’s motion for summary judgment.”

Ahmed v. Pathan (In re Pathan)
24-23022-rmb; 24-2116-rmb · 2025-07-18
Summary judgment (Azharuddin N. Pathan) Granted in part

“For the reasons stated below, the Court denies in part and grants in part Pathan’s motion for summary judgment.”

In re Lang
23-20782-rmb · 2024-09-30
Motion to amend schedules (Joshua C. Lang) Granted

“The debtor’s Motion to Amend Schedule C (ECF No. 42) is GRANTED.”

Huebner v. Humphrey (In re Humphrey)
23-22884-rmb; 23-2112-rmb · 2024-09-30
Nondischargeability claim (Sean Huebner) Granted in part

“The Court concludes that Humphrey is liable to Huebner for intentional misrepresentation and for violation of Wis. Stat. § 100.118 for her misrepresentation on question B11 on the RECR as it relates to the water problem in the kitchen dinette ceiling, and that the resulting debt is non-dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A).”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Three sampled matters were terminated and two remained pending. One terminated matter supplied an express reaffirmation approval.

Draft for Judge Blise with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Blise, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Blise's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace