Thomas S. Zilly

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington (Seattle) Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Republican) 3 signed orders read

How Judge Zilly decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On FOIA Exemption 5 reads the deliberative-process privilege narrowly: a 'Final' biological evaluation adopted as the agency's position is neither agency-authored (if a private consultant prepared it for the applicant) nor pre-decisional, and sharing it with the permit applicant WAIVES the privilege ('selective disclosure ... is offensive to the purposes underlying the FOIA').

“the March 2017 BE is therefore not an agency document for purposes of the FOIA.”

Procedural preferences

Standard Zilly order opener: rules on the papers; opinions are captioned generically ('ORDER' / 'THIS MATTER comes before the Court'), with the disposition stated only in the Conclusion.

“THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant's motion for summary judgment ... Having considered the motion, all materials filed in support of and opposition thereto, and the arguments of counsel, the Court enters the following Order.”

Motion outcomes

Counted from classified signed orders only. Percentages are shown only where the sample is large enough to be meaningful; smaller samples are reported as raw counts.

Summary judgment
N = 4
Granted: 1Granted in part: 3 counts only

A "1 of 1" is one ruling, not a tendency. Treat small samples as illustrative, not predictive.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Heide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
· 2017-05-26
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“State Farm's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 15, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs CPA claim is DISMISSED with prejudice.”

Friends of the Earth v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs
· 2019-01-20
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, docket no. 18, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part ... the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant is ORDERED to provide the March 2017 BE to Plaintiff within twenty (20) days”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, docket no. 13, is GRANTED in part. Claim 4 of the Complaint, docket no. 1, is DISMISSED. Defendant's motion is otherwise DENIED.”

Global Enterprises, LLC v. Montgomery Purdue Blankenship & Austin PLLC
· 2014-09-15
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion for summary judgment.”