Richard A. Jones

How Judge Jones rules, drawn from 18 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington (Seattle)
Appointed by
George W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
2007-10-29
Education
Seattle University (B.P.A., 1972); University of Washington School of Law (J.D., 1975)
Signed orders read
18

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc.
2:07-cv-01189-RAJ · 2008-05-20
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, the court DENIES Autodesk's motion for dismissal or summary judgment (Dkt. # 20).”

Naseth v. Acoustic Home Loans, LLC
· 2010-10-27
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“For the reasons stated above, the court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the parties' motions for summary judgment. Dkt. ## 15, 22.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part
Rijal v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
· 2011-02-22
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the court GRANTS USCIS's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 18) and DENIES Mr. Rijal's motion (Dkt. # 17). The court directs the clerk to enter judgment for USCIS.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“the court GRANTS USCIS's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 18) and DENIES Mr. Rijal's motion (Dkt. # 17).”

Loring v. Payne
2:05-cv-01599 · 2008-04-23
Habeas petition (plaintiff) Denied

“Petitioner's federal habeas petition (Dkt. No. 4) is DENIED and the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice.”

Exendine v. City of Sammamish
2:05-cv-01026 · 2008-06-17
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“For these reasons, the court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants' motion (Dkt. # 32). The motion is DENIED except as to the following: (1) The Defendants' motion as to the Section 1983 claim against King County is GRANTED. This claim is DISMISSED. (2) All claims against Defendant City of Sammamish are DISMISSED in their entirety.”

Burns v. Jones
2:07-cv-00040 · 2008-01-09
Habeas petition (plaintiff) Denied

“Petitioner's petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice”

Huang v. Mukasey
2:07-cv-00132 · 2008-02-12
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“the court GRANTS Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 18) and orders USCIS to issue a decision on Huang's application for adjustment of status within 45 days of this order.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“The court DENIES the Government's cross-motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 22), except to the extent that it seeks dismissal of Defendants Mueller, Cannon, and Mukasey.”

Wang v. Chertoff
2:07-cv-00154 · 2008-03-07
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“the court GRANTS Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 7) and orders USCIS to issue a decision on Wang's application for adjustment of status within 45 days of this order.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“The court DENIES the Government's cross-motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 8), except to the extent that it seeks dismissal of Defendants Mueller and Mukasey.”

Cervantes v. The City of Des Moines
2:06-cv-01714 · 2008-03-27
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the court GRANTS Defendants' motion (Dkt. # 17). The court directs the clerk to enter judgment for Defendants.”

Womanchild v. Nicholson
2:06-cv-01823 · 2008-03-13
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the court GRANTS Defendant's summary judgment motion (Dkt. # 16) and DISMISSES this action. The court directs the clerk to enter judgment for Defendant.”

Tea v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
2:07-cv-00053 · 2009-01-15
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“the court DENIES Mr. Tea's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 15)”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“and DENIES USCIS's motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 27).”

Rosen v. King County
2:07-cv-00352 · 2008-02-05
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 27) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.”

Draft for Judge Jones with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Jones, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Jones's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace